Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Bridging Design and Climate Science
Summary
The third in a series of discussions centered around Climate UX. To make an impact on the climate, many different audiences will need to understand and use climate science. But the science is complex and evolving rapidly. How might we best approach it as translators and facilitators? Through case studies and discussion you’ll learn how four designers are doing this today. Panelists: Ted Booth, HK Dunston, Andrew Otwell; Moderated by: Victor Lombardi
Key Insights
-
•
Climate UX involves translating highly complex and evolving scientific data into usable, understandable formats tailored to different audiences like journalists, scientists, and consumers.
-
•
Victor Lombardi’s Climate Shift Index uses real-time algorithms to model climate change attribution for weather events, making attribution science accessible for daily media use.
-
•
Scientists strongly prefer literal, detailed representations of data over metaphorical or simplified visuals, as abstraction can cause mistrust and suspicion.
-
•
Designing for scientists requires embracing their mental models—frequently based on Excel-like grids and ‘clunky’ graphs—instead of pushing novel visualizations.
-
•
Ted Booth’s startup uses ambient sensing (monitoring the environment rather than equipment directly) combined with AI to predict HVAC system efficiency and maintenance needs.
-
•
Invention in climate tech often involves creating new units of measure and visualization approaches, like degrees Fahrenheit per hour to represent HVAC performance.
-
•
HK emphasizes the role of culture, art, and storytelling alongside science to interpret and react to climate change, as science alone cannot guide human response.
-
•
Learning to design in scientific domains often requires humility, asking many questions, and grappling with unfamiliar foundational knowledge rather than relying on metaphor.
-
•
Science prioritizes avoiding false positives (identifying phenomena that don’t exist) over missing some phenomena, which influences how risk and catastrophe are communicated.
-
•
Designers can provide cultural cover or guardrails that enable scientists to communicate nuanced and complex findings to broader audiences effectively.
Notable Quotes
"The maps lose scientific accuracy but gain understanding by simplifying complex data into color keys that people interpret quickly."
"Scientists want to understand how things work at the bottom level of detail; they don’t want metaphors or abstractions that feel like black boxing."
"In science, it’s better to miss a phenomenon than to misidentify one that doesn’t really exist."
"Excel is the mental model of the scientific research world—a two-dimensional grid of literal data."
"Sometimes you just have to plant a flag and say this is what we can do, even if the math and boundaries are complicated."
"Climate is not operating in geologic time anymore—we face radical, rapid changes unlike past eras."
"For scientists, the cost of being wrong is very high, while designers iterate constantly, embracing failure as part of the process."
"Designers bring a unique cultural perspective to multidisciplinary scientific teams, helping interpret and communicate complex data."
"There is a romance and incredible creativity in data visualization, but sometimes simpler is better, letting the data speak for itself."
"Learning scientific domain knowledge requires humility—being willing to say ‘I don’t get it, can you explain differently?’ and asking dumb questions."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"When projects are late or delayed it’s often due to organizational and cultural issues rather than conduct of the project team."
Carl TurnerYou Can Do This: Understand and Solve Organizational Problems to Jumpstart a Dead Project
March 28, 2023
"Performance management is really about the employee experience; avoid surprises by coaching continuously on both what and how folks are doing."
Karen PascoeDeveloping Experience Teams and Talent in the Enterprise
June 8, 2016
"Human connection is a basic need that doesn’t get paused just because someone works remotely."
Jilanna WilsonDistributed Design Operations Management
October 23, 2019
"We’ve seen self-service tool usage grow from hundreds to millions of veterans served monthly after launching a unified VA platform."
Shawna Hein Kevin HoffmanCreate a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts
November 17, 2022
"The scoping of Canada’s COVID app protected people with new phones, but left vulnerable populations unserved."
Barb SpantonDoing Work That Matters: A Look Beyond The Idealistic Notion of 'Doing Meaningful Work'
June 10, 2022
"As the delivery driver, I connected the dots, got people briefs, and sometimes said no to lofty leadership requests."
Briana ThomasThe Quiet Force: Uncovering Hidden Leadership in High-Impact Design Teams
September 24, 2024
"Creating and holding space is like putting bumpers up in bowling so people know they won’t fail if they engage."
Gina MendoliaTherapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
December 3, 2024
"Being fluent in multiple data languages and understanding behavioral and attitudinal data will be essential."
Lija Hogan Milan Mijatovic Sam Proulx Louis RosenfeldThree Years Out: Perspectives on the Near-Term Future of User Research
March 15, 2024
"DPM loneliness and siloing happen because of wearing too many hats and inheriting mismatched responsibilities."
John Calhoun Rachel PosmanTwo Sides of the DesignOps Coin: Teams Ops and Product Ops
January 8, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are effective behaviors that design operations teams should focus on to deliver value and build trust?
In what ways is AI reshaping design practice and education, according to experts like TJ McLeish?
What are the benefits of linking AI-powered research repositories with tools like Slack for organizational adoption?