Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

War Stories LIVE! Steve Portigal
Gold
Monday, March 30, 2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Share the love for this talk
War Stories LIVE! Steve Portigal
Speakers: Steve Portigal
Link:

Summary

In this talk, Steve recounts a difficult user research project for a financial technology client focused on small business owners. Recruiting participants proved frustrating due to poor internal communication and unreliable recruiting agencies. During interviews, a participant expressed confusion and discomfort about the process, forcing Steve into a vulnerable and uncertain position that challenged his usual rapport-building skills. Reflecting on this experience, Steve connects it to the concept of 'war stories'—personal, vulnerable accounts of research challenges that often involve failure or discomfort. Drawing on insights from Timoris Kino’s The Art of Gathering and George Dawes Green of The Moth, he explains how such stories foster empathy and learning beyond standard methodologies. Steve encourages researchers to share their own work stories, including failures, to normalize vulnerability, improve collective craft, and highlight the deeply human elements of research. He introduces three additional stories from Susan Simon Daniels, Randy Duke, and Tamara Hale, emphasizing that research is an evolving practice shaped by the imperfect, emotional nature of people—both researchers and participants.

Key Insights

  • Recruiting participants internally can be unexpectedly difficult due to poor communication and organizational barriers.

  • Using unfamiliar recruiting agencies adds complexity and stress to research projects.

  • Participants’ confusion and discomfort during interviews often stems from unmet expectations and lack of clarity.

  • Researcher vulnerability and uncertainty during difficult interviews can lead to overeager people-pleasing, which hurts rapport.

  • War stories in research reveal the messy human reality of fieldwork where failures are inevitable and learning is continuous.

  • Storytelling highlights researcher vulnerability and allows the community to empathize with challenges and failures.

  • Reflecting on failure with empathy enables researchers to mitigate self-blame and improve practice.

  • Failures in research provide valuable lessons and grant permission to expect further missteps as part of growth.

  • Sharing stories publicly or within teams builds a culture of transparency and collective craft improvement.

  • Research is more than methods—it requires grappling with human emotions, unpredictability, and change in both researchers and participants.

Notable Quotes

"Finding participants was particularly difficult for small business owners despite previous studies within the organization."

"The recruiting agency insisted they had made it clear there would be two of us at the interview, but the participant was never told."

"He abruptly stopped and asked Why were we asking these questions? Who do we represent? How will this information be used?"

"At the time, his stopping felt aggressive and angry, but looking back I see it was polite and understandable."

"It’d be nice if we had someone to blame, but often no one is truly at fault in these messy situations."

"War stories are personal tales where the storyteller often does not prevail but shares vulnerability."

"A story is about a decision you made, not just what happens to you."

"The messy human reality of research sometimes exceeds the best work you can do—and that’s okay."

"Empathy for the storyteller and oneself is how we safely acknowledge that failure comes for us all."

"Sharing stories of failure normalizes thoughtful and transparent consideration of the work we do."

Ask the Rosenbot
Victor Udoewa
Radical Participatory Design: Decolonizing Participatory Design Processes
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Etienne Fang
The Power of Care: From Human-Centered Research to Humanity-Centered Leadership
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Natalia Radywyl
Co-Designing New Power in Australia's Public Sector
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Jemma Ahmed
Democratization: Working with it, not against it [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Patrick Commarford
Design Staffing for Impact
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Anat Fintzi
Delivering at Scale: Making Traction with Resistant Partners
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Ilana Lipsett
Anticipating Risk, Regulating Tech: A Playbook for Ethical Technology Governance
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Brendan Jarvis
Framing Tomorrow by Questioning Today
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Brennan Hartich
Communicating and Establishing DesignOps as a New Function
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Peter Boersma
How to Define and Maintain a DesignOps Roadmap
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Sheryl Cababa
Thinking in systems to address climate with Sheryl Cababa (Videoconference)
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group (Rosenfeld Community)
Anna Nguyen
Why Our Voice of the Customer is Better Than Yours
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Francesca Barrientos, PhD
You Need Your Own Definition of Design Maturity
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Michael Land
Establishing Design Operations in Government (Videoconference)
2021 • DesignOps Community
Operationalizing DesignOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Peter Merholz
Customer-Centered Design Organizations
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold

More Videos

"Users’ perception predicts attrition and paid referrals — design absolutely matters when people decide to buy or go."

Standardizing Product Merits for Leaders, Designers, and Everyone

June 15, 2018

Simon Wardley

"The only people who can effectively map a space are those who work and understand that space intimately."

Simon Wardley

Maps and Topographical Intelligence (Videoconference)

January 31, 2019

Sandra Camacho

"Bias is a tendency, feeling or opinion for or against something without reason or evidence."

Sandra Camacho

Creating More Bias-Proof Designs

January 22, 2025

Darian Davis

"We’re all capable of creating and perpetuating toxic work relationships."

Darian Davis

Lessons from a Toxic Work Relationship

January 8, 2024

Fisayo Osilaja

"Using ChatGPT allowed me to elevate from a researcher to a strategist by increasing my visibility and trust in the company."

Fisayo Osilaja

[Demo] The AI edge: From researcher to strategist

June 4, 2024

Uday Gajendar

"There is a common thread in craft: dignity, purpose, utility, and beauty."

Uday Gajendar

The Wicked Craft of Enterprise UX

May 13, 2015

Davis Neable

"Trust is often underestimated but is critical when designers face public critique and feedback."

Davis Neable Guy Segal

How to Drive a Design Project When you Don’t Have a Design Team

June 10, 2021

Eniola Oluwole

"TripAdvisor is really nine major business units each thinking like sub companies instead of one end-to-end user experience."

Eniola Oluwole

Lessons From the DesignOps Journey of the World's Largest Travel Site

October 24, 2019

Aurobinda Pradhan

"Design leaders want predictable roadmaps and healthy teams, measurable against timelines and goals."

Aurobinda Pradhan Shashank Deshpande

Introduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts

September 9, 2022