Creating a Basis for Change: Scaling Design Maturity
Summary
In large organizations, design is often sparse or intentionally decentralized in a way that places it subservient to Product and Engineering—and ultimately limits its potential for impact. Knowing that, is it possible to create a basis for change? How might we address the decentralization of design with the goal of increasing design maturity and producing better outcomes? How can we apply the design process organization-wide and across silos? In this session, Jess Greco will discuss how the team at Mastercard is approaching change management through the lens of: Individuals and their needs The organization and its needs Efforts to align those two sets of needs Jess will also share results of Mastercard’s experimental Customer Experience Design Guild; investments in Learning & Development; and Guild-wide efforts to reframe how the organization views the practices and processes that support human-centered design.
Key Insights
-
•
MasterCard's design transformation is driven by the urgent need for new products to succeed independently due to decreased reliance on legacy revenue.
-
•
The Customer Experience and Design Guild connects isolated designers across global teams, providing community, advocacy, and tools for better design practices.
-
•
The skills inventory linked to the career framework allows evidence-based planning and leadership buy-in for targeted learning and development.
-
•
Three distinct organizational models coexist at MasterCard with varying levels of design maturity: embedded teams, decentralized networks, and tiny teams often lacking differentiation skills.
-
•
Relying on single designers performing multiple jobs ('unicorns') limits design impact and hinders differentiated product outcomes.
-
•
Shifting organizational incentives to require customer-centric outcomes from product teams increases accountability and business alignment.
-
•
The Guild's influence expands beyond community-building to shaping staffing, hiring, product development frameworks, and cross-functional partnerships.
-
•
Master classes launched during Jess’s parental leave train product and business teams on design fundamentals to foster a shared understanding of what good design entails.
-
•
The company-wide design conference engages hundreds of participants, aligning content directly to skills inventory findings and practical ways of working.
-
•
Integrating skills assessment with existing frameworks and cross-group stakeholder engagement is critical to gaining broad support and reducing resistance.
Notable Quotes
"The business doesn’t just want to do design better; they want the outcomes that design can make possible."
"We need to get better at betting new products will stand on their own sooner rather than later."
"Designing for differentiation can create constructive friction with partners who have different ideas about what design and research are for."
"Without attribution you can’t get funding, and if it’s not funded, it’s not a priority."
"Strong product outcomes are about quality of customer understanding and collaboration, not just the artifacts we make."
"Some teams rely heavily on one or two designers who can do a bit of everything, but their depth is limited compared to core disciplines."
"We can’t force people to partner with design, but if partnering makes it easier to meet framework requirements, that’s a win for everyone."
"Changing outcomes means changing incentives on all fronts to shift the culture effectively."
"Connecting the skills inventory to the career framework was crucial to getting buy-in across functions."
"The Guild is much more than a community; it’s actively driving standards and creating conditions for success across the company."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Everyone is circling around similar topics but in very different ways—there’s a battle of models but more similarities than differences."
John CutlerOxbows, Rivers, and Estuaries: How to navigate the currents of change (without burning out)
December 3, 2024
"We’re all capable of creating and perpetuating toxic work relationships."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"If you’re having more conversation about what the actual question means than answering it, that’s a problem with the canvas we need to fix."
Dave GrayGroup Activity: Making Sense of DesignOps
November 7, 2017
"These aren't linear; every circle or box has multiple lines into it—our work does not fit neatly into trees or pyramids."
John CutlerThe Alignment Trap
November 29, 2023
"Diagrams provide transparency in the face of uncertainty by showing what there is to know, even if the news is not good."
Abby CovertStuck? Diagrams Help
October 27, 2022
"We started to build an API for how other teams could interact with us like a contract."
Mark InterranteCollaboration Flows in Product Development
June 9, 2017
"We can’t just think technology or innovation will solve our problems; we have to embrace and work with those problems."
Devon PowersImagining Better Futures
March 9, 2022
"Good designers understand you can’t design what you don’t understand."
Prayag NarulaHow to Empower Your Designers to Do Good Research – And Why You Want To
June 10, 2022
"Despite the worst user interface ever, cloud code is the most popular and successful agent that exists today."
Peter Van DijckHands on AI #3: Claude Code for UX people
October 22, 2025
