Rosenverse
When UX Research and Institutional Racism Collide: A Case Study

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

When UX Research and Institutional Racism Collide: A Case Study

Gold
Friday, March 12, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Share the love for this talk
When UX Research and Institutional Racism Collide: A Case Study
Speakers: Emily Williams and Nora Fiore
Link:

Summary

Our recent UX engagement on a federal grant focused on a challenge in Alzheimer’s research: Black, Hispanic, and/or Latinx people are diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease more frequently than their white counterparts, yet participate in clinical trials, particularly prevention trials, at a lower rate. We were tasked with solving “usability issues” that prevented underrepresented populations from participating in research. Predictably, we surfaced more about inequality than usability. In this talk, we will share some of the mistakes we made and lessons we learned about broadening the definition of usability. Additionally, we will discuss how we articulated systemic inequality as part of our usability findings, and how this experience continues to influence our thinking about usability, inclusivity and anti-racism in our present research endeavours.

Key Insights

  • Usability in marginalized communities must consider historical trauma and distrust beyond standard metrics like time or error rate.

  • Clinical trial registries underrepresent Black and Hispanic Latino participants despite higher Alzheimer’s incidence.

  • Questions about race on forms can spark skepticism and suspicion due to historical abuses and systemic racism.

  • Showing diverse leadership on organizational about pages significantly boosts trust for participants.

  • Users evaluate organizations through leadership representation and background checks, not just website content.

  • Financial incentives for clinical trials are a valid motivator and sign of respect, especially for marginalized populations.

  • Designing for equity requires expanding the researcher’s role beyond checking usability boxes to confronting systemic issues.

  • Participant storytelling helps counter biased assumptions about motivations like altruism versus payment.

  • Building digital relationships with communities harmed by systemic racism requires transparency and reciprocity.

  • Researchers must be willing to take risks and be bold to advocate for equity despite client or stakeholder discomfort.

Notable Quotes

"My race has been treated like guinea pigs for most of our existence."

"Black people in general are sometimes looked at as disposable."

"Showing is better than telling, especially when it comes to equity."

"A website has no meaningful identity outside of the people it represents."

"I want to see pictures of your leadership and board. Do you have women, do you have people of color?"

"Payment is an important part of the research relationship for many users."

"There is no perfect user, and motivations can coexist within a single person."

"Mentioning incentives can build trust by signaling reciprocity."

"It's wrong to expect people to want to do more work with less motivation."

"Sometimes you just have to be a little bit bold and be willing to use your power and privilege to advocate for what you know to be true."

Ask the Rosenbot
Prabhas Pokharel
Order and Chaos: New Ways of Collaborating on Synthesis and Storytelling
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Dante Guintu
How to Crush the Talent Crunch
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Iram Shah
Closing Keynote: The View from the Top
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Daniel Orbach
Zero to One: Co-Creating Operating Models with your Team
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
GenAI for UXers: A Rosenbot Demo and Discussion
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Jamika Burge
Embracing change: Navigating shifting landscapes with compassion and agency
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Peter Merholz
Design at Scale is People!
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Erin Weigel
Testing and Experimentation Tools
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Saara Kamppari-Miller
Key Metrics: Comparing Three Letter Acronym Metrics That Include the Word “Key”
2024 • DesignOps Community
Jemma Ahmed
Theme 2 Intro
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Erin Weigel
Failure Friday #6: 90% of Everything I Do is Either Broken or Pointless
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Briana Thomas
When Design Ops Comes in H.O.T. : A Tale of a Transformed Design Org
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Steve Turbek
Designing Interactive Graphics with AI Code Help
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Ben Reason
Making the system visible: The fastest path to better decisions
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
John Maeda
Making Sense of Enterprise UX
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Jon Fukuda
All the Ops: Successful cross-functional collaboration
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold

More Videos

Surya Vanka

"Good problem statements begin with aspirational mindsets and use backcasting to envision preferred futures."

Surya Vanka

Unleashing Swarm Creativity to Solve Enterprise Challenges

June 10, 2021

Patrick Boehler

"Small specific interventions travel further than big programs within organizations."

Patrick Boehler Madison Karas

The service shift: transforming media organizations to create real value through design

November 19, 2025

Andreas Huebner

"Our user base is really fun and complex, with different preferences that require nuanced automation approaches."

Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig Brookes

What Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?

March 11, 2021

Patrizia Bertini

"The business value of design operations is hidden, unclear, and not even talked about."

Patrizia Bertini Alexandra Mengoni León

Pushing DesignOps’ Influence into New Global Markets

September 9, 2022

Phil Gilbert

"We had an engineering culture that confused uniformity with design, and consistency with design."

Phil Gilbert

A Consistent Culture of Design

May 14, 2015

Yulya Besplemennova

"I wouldn’t leave AI tools to juniors because it’s crucial to have your own experience to evaluate outputs."

Yulya Besplemennova

[Demo] Stress-testing GenAI in user research synthesis

June 4, 2024

Sarah Rink

"If the research question requires deep context, remote probably won’t do."

Sarah Rink

Remote User Research: Dos and Don'ts from the Virtual Field

June 11, 2020

Mujtaba Hameed

"The core thesis is that saving time with AI and reallocating it into research itself unlocks the true potential of the field."

Mujtaba Hameed

The new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research

March 11, 2026

Sheryl Cababa

"Freedom dreaming is dreaming about a system that is free from today's oppression."

Sheryl Cababa

Living in the Clouds: Adopting a Systems Thinking Mindset

June 6, 2023