When UX Research and Institutional Racism Collide: A Case Study
Summary
Key Insights
-
•
Usability in marginalized communities must consider historical trauma and distrust beyond standard metrics like time or error rate.
-
•
Clinical trial registries underrepresent Black and Hispanic Latino participants despite higher Alzheimer’s incidence.
-
•
Questions about race on forms can spark skepticism and suspicion due to historical abuses and systemic racism.
-
•
Showing diverse leadership on organizational about pages significantly boosts trust for participants.
-
•
Users evaluate organizations through leadership representation and background checks, not just website content.
-
•
Financial incentives for clinical trials are a valid motivator and sign of respect, especially for marginalized populations.
-
•
Designing for equity requires expanding the researcher’s role beyond checking usability boxes to confronting systemic issues.
-
•
Participant storytelling helps counter biased assumptions about motivations like altruism versus payment.
-
•
Building digital relationships with communities harmed by systemic racism requires transparency and reciprocity.
-
•
Researchers must be willing to take risks and be bold to advocate for equity despite client or stakeholder discomfort.
Notable Quotes
"My race has been treated like guinea pigs for most of our existence."
"Black people in general are sometimes looked at as disposable."
"Showing is better than telling, especially when it comes to equity."
"A website has no meaningful identity outside of the people it represents."
"I want to see pictures of your leadership and board. Do you have women, do you have people of color?"
"Payment is an important part of the research relationship for many users."
"There is no perfect user, and motivations can coexist within a single person."
"Mentioning incentives can build trust by signaling reciprocity."
"It's wrong to expect people to want to do more work with less motivation."
"Sometimes you just have to be a little bit bold and be willing to use your power and privilege to advocate for what you know to be true."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We had to push through analysis paralysis and trust our guts as customer-facing teams that knew the business."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"Categories are dangerous but not bad."
Peter MorvilleThe Architecture of Understanding
May 13, 2015
"I was kind of wandering around aimlessly trying to find the next job."
Renee ReidBecoming a ResearchH.E.R (Highly Enterprise Ready)
June 3, 2019
"For some users, AI products are not just tools, they are relationships."
Dane DeSutterKeeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not
March 26, 2024
"Involving people with disabilities from the start reveals impact and usability issues that automated testing simply cannot catch."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
October 3, 2023
"A poor experience on a web visit isn’t out of sight, out of mind; it impacts their entire history with the brand."
Andrew Custage Michael MallettThe Digital Journey: Research on Consumer Frustration and Loyalty
March 29, 2023
"The nitty gritty is a space to become resources for each other so people know who to talk to when they have questions."
Shelby SwitzerMaking Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World
December 10, 2021
"Generative AI is non-deterministic and doesn’t understand meaning, so baseline error rates exist in all tools we use."
Llewyn PaineCoexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
March 11, 2025
"A living systems lens urges us to see wholes, holes, and interdependent relationships in organizations."
Robin BeersNavigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change
March 13, 2025
