Rosenverse
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)

Gold
Friday, March 12, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Share the love for this talk
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
Speakers: Lily Aduana , Savannah Hobbs and Brittany Rutherford
Link:

Summary

Oftentimes companies rely on recruiting agencies to handle finding participants for their research. While there are some advantages to this approach, and cases where outsourcing is the best option, nowadays bringing research in-house can be simple, flexible, cost-effective, and fast. Learn more about how and why to bring your recruiting in-house.

Key Insights

  • Recruitment agencies typically require a two-week quoting and setup process before starting data collection.

  • User Interviews allows immediate project launch with a median first participant arrival time of just three hours.

  • Researchers gain full transparency on who applied, qualified, and confirmed directly via a dashboard with User Interviews.

  • User Interviews includes built-in fraud detection to prevent professional testers and scammers from skewing data.

  • Recruitment fees via agencies can range from $100 to $400 per participant plus administration fees; User Interviews fees range from $40 to $80 without upfront costs.

  • User Interviews enables direct messaging with participants throughout the recruitment and study process, reducing no-shows and enhancing troubleshooting.

  • Researchers can flex screening criteria on participants in real-time within User Interviews when necessary.

  • Scheduling integrates with Google and Outlook calendars, allowing researchers to set availability and avoid double bookings.

  • User Interviews supports various study types: 1-on-1 interviews, focus groups, diary studies, moderated and unmoderated research.

  • Pilot studies are recommended and easy to conduct on User Interviews to test screener questions and study protocols before full launch.

Notable Quotes

"When working with an agency, the quoting process takes about two weeks before recruitment even starts."

"With User Interviews, you can launch a project immediately and get your first qualified participant as fast as three hours."

"You get a dashboard that shows who applied, who qualified, and even who didn’t qualify—all in real time."

"Professional testers are very crafty; one even changed her name repeatedly to get recruited multiple times."

"You only pay for successfully completed sessions on User Interviews—no upfront cost, no fees for no-shows or cancellations."

"I message participants regularly during studies to reduce no-shows and troubleshoot any issues immediately."

"If I forgot a critical screener question, I just messaged all qualified participants to confirm they meet the criteria before approval."

"Scheduling syncs with your Google or Outlook calendar so you only book participants at times that work for you."

"User Interviews offers multi-country recruitment at the same price, supporting Canada, UK, Germany, Australia, and South Africa."

"Pilot studies are a must; I always run a pilot session the day before full launch to refine my discussion guide."

Ask the Rosenbot
Ariel Kennan
Building a Design Culture
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Cara Maritz
The Art of Extrapolation
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Ashley Sewall
Exit Interview #5: Designing My Life After Tech
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Magdalena Zadara
Zero Hour: How to Get Far Quickly When Starting Your Digital Service Unit Late
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
John Maeda
About Design Organizations
2019 • DesignOps Community
Stephanie Wade
Building and Sustaining Design in Government
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Bria Alexander
Reflect and Chart Forward
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Liam Thurston
Why Your Design Team Is Quitting, And How To Fix It
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Taylor Jennings
Repository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Ovetta Sampson
Turning UX Passion into Real Product Influence
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Nancy Douyon
We'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Joseph Williams
Unlocking impact and influence through inclusive hiring in research
2021 • Advancing Research Community
John Devanney
The Design Management Office
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Bas Raijmakers, PhD (RCA)
What Design Research can Learn from Documentary Filmmaking
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Discussion
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Indi Young
Thinking styles: Mend hidden cracks in your market
2025 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Sofía Delsordo

"We wanted them to see the government not as an old machine, but as people who see themselves as users."

Sofía Delsordo Kassim Vera

Public Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter

December 8, 2021

"Curiosity and asking lots of questions helps push boundaries and improve solutions."

Product and Design at Bloomberg: A 15-year Evolution

December 6, 2022

Liza Pemstein

"I had a hunger for process and efficiency once I built a feedback bot to share customer insights."

Liza Pemstein Jane Davis

Scaling Research Via an Ops First Model at Clever

March 27, 2023

Kara Kane

"Civic design and government design practice have reached many milestones in the past 10 years."

Kara Kane

Theme One Intro

November 16, 2022

Mark Interrante

"Nobody’s gonna listen to you people until you start speaking in the language of business."

Mark Interrante Harry Max

AI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)

July 11, 2024

Sam Proulx

"Involving people with disabilities from the start reveals impact and usability issues that automated testing simply cannot catch."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

October 3, 2023

Rich Mironov

"Product managers are going to have to say no to roughly 95% of everything that comes in."

Rich Mironov

How Can Product Managers and UXers Help Each Other (and Why are Product Folks so Annoying Sometimes)?

December 6, 2022

Juhan Sonin

"If someone says hell no, don’t stop, keep going."

Juhan Sonin

Design Now! The Agenda for Action

September 4, 2025

Mansi Gupta

"Women’s empowerment is often glorified but doesn’t necessarily meet their needs beneath the surface."

Mansi Gupta

Drawing from Feminist Practice to Make Inclusive Design Operational

September 9, 2022