Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
Gold
Friday, March 12, 2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Share the love for this talk
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
Speakers: Lily Aduana , Savannah Hobbs and Brittany Rutherford
Link:

Summary

Oftentimes companies rely on recruiting agencies to handle finding participants for their research. While there are some advantages to this approach, and cases where outsourcing is the best option, nowadays bringing research in-house can be simple, flexible, cost-effective, and fast. Learn more about how and why to bring your recruiting in-house.

Key Insights

  • Recruitment via User Interviews offers a median participant arrival time of just three hours, significantly faster than typical two-week agency lead times.

  • Using agencies often involves opaque processes, delayed updates, and limits on seeing screener responses, adding stress and uncertainty to recruitment.

  • Professional test takers and scammers can infiltrate recruitment through agencies, causing cancellations and extra fees; User Interviews includes fraud detection to mitigate this.

  • User Interviews charges recruitment fees between $40 and $80 per participant, substantially lower than the $100 to $400 typical agency fees, plus no upfront payment is required.

  • Researchers can message participants directly within User Interviews, reducing no-shows and enabling quick troubleshooting that agencies cannot always provide.

  • User Interviews allows researchers to flexibly approve participants who narrowly fail screening questions, enhancing recruitment adaptability.

  • Scheduling within User Interviews syncs with Google or Outlook calendars to prevent double or triple bookings, common problems when using multiple agencies.

  • Pilot testing studies before full launches is standard practice, and User Interviews makes this simple to execute by scheduling a few participants ahead.

  • User Interviews supports international recruitment at consistent pricing, currently available in US, Canada, UK, Germany, Australia, and South Africa, with no fee for screener translations.

  • Researchers only pay for completed sessions with User Interviews, avoiding fees for no-shows or dishonest participants detected during screening.

Notable Quotes

"The first qualified participant comes in at a median average time of only three hours."

"With an agency, there’s usually a two-week quoting process before recruitment even starts."

"I had a participant get signed up three times across different agencies through Craigslist—that’s a professional test taker."

"You actually see qualified participants come in on a dashboard in real time, including their screener responses."

"User Interviews has automatic fraud detection and zero tolerance for professional test takers."

"There’s no upfront cost with User Interviews; you only pay for completed sessions."

"You can message participants directly through User Interviews to reduce no shows and troubleshoot issues instantly."

"Scheduling syncs with Google or Outlook so you avoid double bookings common in agency recruiting."

"If you realize you forgot a critical screener question, you can message all qualified participants to confirm their eligibility."

"Paying $400 per participant through an agency was a nightmare; User Interviews fees are much more affordable."

Ask the Rosenbot
Jennifer Strickland
Fireside Chat: How Design Addresses a World on Fire (Videoconference)
2022 • Civic Design Community
Yulya Besplemennova
[Demo] Stress-testing GenAI in user research synthesis
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Helen Armstrong
Augment the Human. Interrogate the System.
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Sheryl Cababa
Thinking in systems to address climate with Sheryl Cababa (Videoconference)
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group (Rosenfeld Community)
Ned Dwyer
The Future of DesignOps is Tool Consolidation
2024 • DesignOps 2024
Gold
Bria Alexander
Reflect and Chart Forward
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Mariah Hay
BUILD: Discussion
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Bria Alexander
Theme Two Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Indi Young
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young (Videoconference)
2019 • Advancing Research Community
Adam Thomas
Survival Metrics – Making Change in a Fast, Data-Informed, and Politically Safe Way
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Jacqui Frey
Setting the Table for Dynamic Change
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Iram Shah
Closing Keynote: The View from the Top
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Dalia El-Shimy
So You've Got a Seat at the Table. Now What?
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Nicole Bergstrom
AccessibilityOps: Moving beyond “nice to have”
2024 • DesignOps Community
Dave Malouf
The Past, Present, and Future of DesignOps: a 2-part DesignOps Community Call (Part 1) (Videoconference)
2022 • DesignOps Community
Leah Buley
Ask Me Anything with Leah Buley and Joe Natoli, co-authors of The User Experience Team of One (2nd edition)
2024 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

"We want teams to have autonomy and power to make pivot, shelve, and proceed decisions, not leadership dictating."

Standardizing Product Merits for Leaders, Designers, and Everyone

June 15, 2018

Simon Wardley

"I realized I was just making it up despite the company’s growth."

Simon Wardley

Maps and Topographical Intelligence (Videoconference)

January 31, 2019

Sandra Camacho

"The Twitter algorithm favored lighter skin tones when cropping images, reflecting racial bias in tech."

Sandra Camacho

Creating More Bias-Proof Designs

January 22, 2025

Darian Davis

"Appealing to stakeholders’ best interests helps build trust and rapport."

Darian Davis

Lessons from a Toxic Work Relationship

January 8, 2024

Fisayo Osilaja

"My goal today is to showcase how generative AI can go beyond just speeding up our processes and actually catapult us in our career."

Fisayo Osilaja

[Demo] The AI edge: From researcher to strategist

June 4, 2024

Uday Gajendar

"Temporary, quick, and sometimes rough artifacts have a lifespan just long enough for the conversation they enable."

Uday Gajendar

The Wicked Craft of Enterprise UX

May 13, 2015

Davis Neable

"Experience vision is a powerful tool because it gives everyone a tangible goal to work towards."

Davis Neable Guy Segal

How to Drive a Design Project When you Don’t Have a Design Team

June 10, 2021

Eniola Oluwole

"Launching a design system is not a sprint, there’s no end, it’s always a continuous process."

Eniola Oluwole

Lessons From the DesignOps Journey of the World's Largest Travel Site

October 24, 2019

Aurobinda Pradhan

"Design leaders want predictable roadmaps and healthy teams, measurable against timelines and goals."

Aurobinda Pradhan Shashank Deshpande

Introduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts

September 9, 2022