Summary
Oftentimes companies rely on recruiting agencies to handle finding participants for their research. While there are some advantages to this approach, and cases where outsourcing is the best option, nowadays bringing research in-house can be simple, flexible, cost-effective, and fast. Learn more about how and why to bring your recruiting in-house.
Key Insights
-
•
Recruitment via User Interviews offers a median participant arrival time of just three hours, significantly faster than typical two-week agency lead times.
-
•
Using agencies often involves opaque processes, delayed updates, and limits on seeing screener responses, adding stress and uncertainty to recruitment.
-
•
Professional test takers and scammers can infiltrate recruitment through agencies, causing cancellations and extra fees; User Interviews includes fraud detection to mitigate this.
-
•
User Interviews charges recruitment fees between $40 and $80 per participant, substantially lower than the $100 to $400 typical agency fees, plus no upfront payment is required.
-
•
Researchers can message participants directly within User Interviews, reducing no-shows and enabling quick troubleshooting that agencies cannot always provide.
-
•
User Interviews allows researchers to flexibly approve participants who narrowly fail screening questions, enhancing recruitment adaptability.
-
•
Scheduling within User Interviews syncs with Google or Outlook calendars to prevent double or triple bookings, common problems when using multiple agencies.
-
•
Pilot testing studies before full launches is standard practice, and User Interviews makes this simple to execute by scheduling a few participants ahead.
-
•
User Interviews supports international recruitment at consistent pricing, currently available in US, Canada, UK, Germany, Australia, and South Africa, with no fee for screener translations.
-
•
Researchers only pay for completed sessions with User Interviews, avoiding fees for no-shows or dishonest participants detected during screening.
Notable Quotes
"The first qualified participant comes in at a median average time of only three hours."
"With an agency, there’s usually a two-week quoting process before recruitment even starts."
"I had a participant get signed up three times across different agencies through Craigslist—that’s a professional test taker."
"You actually see qualified participants come in on a dashboard in real time, including their screener responses."
"User Interviews has automatic fraud detection and zero tolerance for professional test takers."
"There’s no upfront cost with User Interviews; you only pay for completed sessions."
"You can message participants directly through User Interviews to reduce no shows and troubleshoot issues instantly."
"Scheduling syncs with Google or Outlook so you avoid double bookings common in agency recruiting."
"If you realize you forgot a critical screener question, you can message all qualified participants to confirm their eligibility."
"Paying $400 per participant through an agency was a nightmare; User Interviews fees are much more affordable."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"I wish I could tell my 22-year-old self what to stop doing and what to embrace to be a better designer."
Adam Cutler Karen Pascoe Ian Swinson Susan WorthmanDiscussion
June 8, 2016
"UX directors often feel like this poor person in the middle here getting pulled in all these directions."
Peter MerholzThe Trials and Tribulations of Directors of UX (Videoconference)
July 13, 2023
"If you haven’t designed who your teams are and who your players are, expecting people to comply with standards won’t work."
Lisa WelchmanCleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers
June 14, 2018
"Green spaces in cities can greatly enhance our quality of life and resilience."
Vincent BrathwaiteOpener: Past, Present, and Future—Closing the Racial Divide in Design Teams
October 22, 2020
"Engineers can be our biggest allies in making really important process changes."
Brenna FallonLearning Over Outcomes
October 24, 2019
"Linear perspective created this myth that we can see reality from a single perspective, which is the source of all misunderstanding."
Tricia WangSpatial Collapse: Designing for Emergent Culture
January 8, 2024
"We used a Python algorithm with a correlation matrix to identify meaningful clusters from survey responses."
Edgar Anzaldua MorenoUsing Research to Determine Unique Value Proposition
March 11, 2021
"Context-related data gathered through qualitative research is the first to reach our decision-making centers in the brain."
Designing Systems at Scale
November 7, 2018
"The conversion design process creates collective knowledge, which gets reinfused to strengthen future experiments."
Erin WeigelGet Your Whole Team Testing to Design for Impact
July 24, 2024
