Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Liminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations

Gold
Thursday, May 14, 2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Share the love for this talk
Liminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
Speakers: Dave Gray
Link:

Summary

In his talk, Dave Gray uses metaphors like the enterprise elephant and the blind men to describe how different perspectives in an organization create competing realities. Drawing on the concept of the ladder of inference from Chris Argyris, he explains how experiences, attention, theories, judgments, and beliefs form a self-sealing logic that organizations and individuals unconsciously reinforce. Lou Gerstner's story of IBM’s turnaround illustrates the need to see beyond siloed views. Dave emphasizes that beliefs drive behavior and that without understanding underlying beliefs and needs, efforts to change or get buy-in will fail. He shares powerful stories, such as Adrian’s misunderstanding of a team member’s late working hours, illustrating how testing assumptions through conversation helps break false beliefs. Dave highlights the risks of executive isolation using the “monkey tree” metaphor, where information is filtered upward, reinforcing distorted realities. He advocates for empathy and active outreach by leaders to break bubbles through direct engagement with customers and teams. Drawing on examples from Catherine Courage and Alyssa Briggs, he shows how creating safe spaces—via warm tea, cookies, or field trips—can foster trust and openness. Dave stresses the importance of double-loop learning and acting as if alternative beliefs are true as a way to test and shift organizational culture. He concludes with practical advice to assess people’s needs, understand behaviors, and design experiments to validate or revise beliefs, encouraging everyone to break autopilot routines and cultivate curiosity and openness.

Key Insights

  • Organizational culture is a self-reinforcing bubble shaped by shared beliefs that filter and distort reality.

  • People’s beliefs form through a ladder of inference: from experiences and attention to theories, judgments, and stories.

  • People rarely share their true beliefs openly, making understanding underlying needs critical to effect change.

  • Self-sealing logic protects existing beliefs by dismissing conflicting information and rationalizing contradictory evidence.

  • Senior leaders are especially vulnerable to distorted realities due to filtered information and lack of direct engagement.

  • Breaking patterns and assumptions requires curiosity, experimentation, and acting 'as if' alternative beliefs are true.

  • Creating safe spaces using simple acts like sharing warm tea or cookies can build trust and surface genuine needs.

  • Empathy for others, including leaders, helps support breakthrough out of limiting belief bubbles.

  • Small courageous acts, such as breaking dress codes or challenging routines, can build reputations and open new possibilities.

  • Double-loop learning—examining and revising underlying beliefs—is needed to overcome resistance and foster real organizational change.

Notable Quotes

"If you do anything with other people, you’re creating culture."

"The enterprise feels like a big elephant; different people touch different parts and argue what it really is."

"Beliefs are habits of action; they are the rules that guide how we decide to act."

"People don’t share their beliefs; you have to search for and understand them to get true buy-in."

"The higher up you are in an organization, the more distorted your reality is likely to be."

"It’s impossible to be angry with a warm cup of tea in your hand."

"The only way to get outside your bubble is to act as if an alternative belief is true and test it."

"Change only happens in the present moment, not the past or future."

"Most enterprises are not emotionally safe places; people can’t just leave emotions at the door."

"You lie to yourself more than anyone else; the lie is that you are completely rational and objective."

Ask the Rosenbot
Shipra Kayan
Emerging principles for using AI in Design: What the product design team at Miro has learned from deeply integrating AI in their workflow
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Christian Bason
Expand—Rethinking Design for Public Challenges
2022 • Civic Design Community
Taiye Akin-Akinyosoye
Amplifying voices and enhancing user research through group interviews
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Kristin Skinner
Group Activity: A Deep Dive Into Value and Outcomes
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Ovetta Sampson
Research in the Automated Future
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Bria Alexander
Day 2 Welcome
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Theresa Slate
Why Changing Hearts & Minds Doesn’t Work When Promoting DE&I Efforts, but Checklists Do
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Greg Petroff
Exit Interview #1: Greg Petroff: From Silicon Valley Executive to Sonoma County Possibilitarian
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Jack Moffett
SAFe or Sorry?
2019 • Enterprise Community
Uday Gajendar
From AI to Zeitgeist: Theory as the design antidote to AI hype
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Dane DeSutter
What co-speech gestures reveal about users’ thinking during interviews
2023 • Rosenfeld Community
Kate Stern
Scaling Learning for the Future
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Sam Proulx
Accessibility: An Opportunity to Innovate
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Pippa Lomas
Paving the Path for Neurodiversity in Design
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Chloe Amos-Edkins
A Cultural Approach: Research in the Context of Glocalisation
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Jon Fukuda
Theme 3 Intro
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold

More Videos

John Cutler

"Everyone is circling around similar topics but in very different ways—there’s a battle of models but more similarities than differences."

John Cutler

Oxbows, Rivers, and Estuaries: How to navigate the currents of change (without burning out)

December 3, 2024

Darian Davis

"Reviewing decisions out loud held everyone accountable and made it harder for Jeff to forget or change his mind."

Darian Davis

Lessons from a Toxic Work Relationship

January 8, 2024

Dave Gray

"If you’re having more conversation about what the actual question means than answering it, that’s a problem with the canvas we need to fix."

Dave Gray

Group Activity: Making Sense of DesignOps

November 7, 2017

John Cutler

"The highest leverage thing you can do is design statements that capture the essence in ways that set sail a thousand ships."

John Cutler

The Alignment Trap

November 29, 2023

Abby Covert

"Diagrams allow us to emotionally hit pause and come back ready to dig further."

Abby Covert

Stuck? Diagrams Help

October 27, 2022

Mark Interrante

"If you want to get faster output, optimize the work and workflow first — not add more hours."

Mark Interrante

Collaboration Flows in Product Development

June 9, 2017

Devon Powers

"Too often, futures imaginaries want to erase or align difference rather than reckon with it."

Devon Powers

Imagining Better Futures

March 9, 2022

Prayag Narula

"Good designers understand you can’t design what you don’t understand."

Prayag Narula

How to Empower Your Designers to Do Good Research – And Why You Want To

June 10, 2022

Peter Van Dijck

"Your short term memory is the context window; too big, and the model has trouble accessing everything."

Peter Van Dijck

Hands on AI #3: Claude Code for UX people

October 22, 2025