Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
This is part 2 of a 3-part series on prioritization, led by Harry Max, author of Managing Priorities: How to Create Better Plans and Make Smarter Decisions. Part 1 | Part 3 For executives, prioritization comes down to the ordinal list of what matters most. The challenge, however, is that they must deal with an array of competing imperatives: how to make money, use resources efficiently, pursue goals and objectives, satisfy existing customers or constituents, grow market share, hire and retain talent, manage unit cost economics, and so on. And pitting one imperative against another is tricky business. It’s a tightrope act. But leaving it to chance isn’t an option. Effective prioritization unlocks the latent power of teams. It supercharges strategy activation and taps the potential to align people to accelerate and get traction. Clear priorities enable change. This conversation will explore why leaders must prioritize at the right logical level to achieve their desired results.
Key Insights
-
•
Leadership prioritization involves managing epic challenges due to conflicting imperatives and scale, unlike individual or small team prioritization.
-
•
Prioritization is best understood as a continuous process, supported by periodic and episodic events that formalize decision moments.
-
•
Effective prioritization balances speed versus accuracy; doing it too slowly or too quickly can lead to costly mistakes.
-
•
Delegation works best when leaders assign ownership to those whose strengths align with the priority and who can independently drive it forward.
-
•
Explicit and mature operating models, like Salesforce’s V2MOM or EOS, are critical for aligning priorities and managing work effectively across large teams.
-
•
Publishing clear priority lists reduces organizational noise by allowing teams to focus on what truly matters and avoid unnecessary distractions.
-
•
Lower-priority tasks, such as technical debt or infrastructure improvements, must be acknowledged as necessities or managed carefully with dedicated time budgets.
-
•
Priorities guide attention and options but do not replace judgment; decision-making still requires balancing competing needs based on context and risk.
-
•
Prioritizing at the right organizational level of abstraction is crucial to avoid breaking coordination across functions or missing stakeholders.
-
•
Starting prioritization improvement individually encourages a ripple effect, helping to align teams and eventually organizations more naturally.
Notable Quotes
"You never have enough time or enough people to actually get done everything you wish you could, so you learn to prioritize well or you won’t be successful."
"Prioritization is like hiking — you’re always looking where you’re putting your feet and adjusting continuously based on what you see around you."
"All lists are prioritized lists; even bullet lists have an order, and the most important should be at the top."
"Your priorities don’t tell you what to do; your judgment points you in the direction of how to allocate resources and make decisions."
"Getting the date right is really important — you can change it once, but don’t change it twice, or it breaks coordination."
"You want to delegate something only if the person has ownership, competency, and feels safe to come back and ask for help if needed."
"Companies where prioritization goes well typically have an explicit operating model and a level of maturity around it."
"The way to fix a bad decision is to make several good ones afterward, because there is no undo button."
"Publishing your explicit list of priorities is a great way to reduce noise and focus the organization’s efforts."
"Prioritize at the right level because it’s easy to miss important stakeholders or criteria by working too narrowly."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"A good story that people can retell is key for global communication, even if it distorts a bit."
Adam Cutler Karen Pascoe Ian Swinson Susan WorthmanDiscussion
June 8, 2016
"UXers are less satisfied than their peers because we have failed to set expectations about the real work of UX in organizations."
Peter MerholzThe Trials and Tribulations of Directors of UX (Videoconference)
July 13, 2023
"Human biases are the real problem behind algorithmic bias, not the algorithms themselves."
Lisa WelchmanCleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers
June 14, 2018
"Every small action contributes to a larger impact in the fight against climate change."
Vincent BrathwaiteOpener: Past, Present, and Future—Closing the Racial Divide in Design Teams
October 22, 2020
"The greatest sign of success for a teacher is just to be able to say the children are now working as if I did not exist."
Brenna FallonLearning Over Outcomes
October 24, 2019
"Most organizations are still asking design questions at a global level; we need to be hyper-local now."
Tricia WangSpatial Collapse: Designing for Emergent Culture
January 8, 2024
"Clusters describing demographics and behaviors alone were not enough; we needed emotional personas to find value propositions."
Edgar Anzaldua MorenoUsing Research to Determine Unique Value Proposition
March 11, 2021
"Service lines bridge the gaps between product lines through information flows to provide the right knowledge at the right time."
Designing Systems at Scale
November 7, 2018
"If my experiment made front-page news tomorrow, what would the headline be? Would my mother be proud?"
Erin WeigelGet Your Whole Team Testing to Design for Impact
July 24, 2024
