Summary
In this interactive session, Sam Proulx, accessibility evangelist at Fable, will draw from experience as a person with a disability, and from Fable’s thousands of hours of research experience, to answer all of your questions about conducting prototype reviews with people with disabilities. What design systems work best? What disabilities can participate in prototype reviews out of the box, and what types of disabilities might need special adaptations? What information should a prototype contain, to get the best feedback and engagement from people with disabilities? How can you and your organization learn to better shift left, and involve people with disabilities as early as possible in the design process, and why should you? We’ll also have plenty of time for your own questions! If you’ve been wanting to conduct prototype reviews that involve people with disabilities, but weren’t quite sure where to begin, don’t miss this session!
Key Insights
-
•
Starting prototype reviews with screen magnification users offers the biggest impact with the least adaptation needed.
-
•
Screen magnification users benefit from simply enlarging visuals, color contrast changes, and panning, making graphical prototypes easily accessible.
-
•
Users with physical challenges often struggle with hover states and unlabeled controls, requiring adaptations or researcher assistance during prototype reviews.
-
•
Screen reader users are the hardest group to include in prototype reviews because graphical prototypes lack semantic structure needed for screen readers to interpret.
-
•
Prototypes for screen reader users often must be recreated in text-based formats like Microsoft Word or Google Docs to represent semantic layout accurately.
-
•
Design systems like Figma and Adobe XD generally do not natively support screen reader-compatible prototypes, though progress is underway.
-
•
Accessibility reviews should include checking control labeling consistency to match voice commands for users relying on voice dictation or alternative navigation.
-
•
Large white space becomes a major concern for screen magnification users as it can consume excessive screen real estate when magnified.
-
•
Mobile app accessibility concerns largely mirror desktop issues, differing mainly in screen size and gesture input.
-
•
Companies like Adobe are leading active research efforts into improving prototyping tools for better accessibility support, especially for screen reader users.
Notable Quotes
"Including people with disabilities in prototype reviews can be a little different based on the assistive technology someone uses and their needs."
"Screen magnification users see everything bigger but have less available screen real estate, so they pan around a lot more."
"The best bang for your buck with least effort is to start with screen magnification users in your prototype reviews."
"Users with physical challenges often cannot hover easily, so prototypes need to indicate where hover is required and how sensitive it is."
"Significant adaptation is required to involve screen reader users in prototype reviews because prototypes are graphical and lack semantic markup."
"Microsoft Excel, Google Docs, and Word are surprisingly good places to build screen reader accessible prototypes using semantic labels and structures."
"When working with screen reader users in prototype reviews, you have to simulate the screen reader experience with them interactively."
"There is a lot of research going on to make screen reader accessible prototypes easier to build, but right now it’s early to mid-stage."
"Control labels need to be consistent because people using voice dictation rely on those labels to interact with controls."
"Mobile accessibility testing isn’t fundamentally different from desktop; it mainly comes down to screen size and gesture differences."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Collaboration should include stakeholders often not traditionally represented, like marketing, sales, and customer support."
Angelos ArnisNavigating the Rapid Shifts in Tech's Turbulent Terrain
October 2, 2023
"Interviewing for design ops needs a special toolkit that shows how to present your skills and prepare effectively."
John Calhoun Rachel PosmanBring your DesignOps Story to Life! The Definitive DesignOps Book Jam
October 3, 2023
"Design is often a subsidiary of product, really there to serve engineering—wireframe people."
Alfred KahnA Seat at the Table: Making Your Team a Strategic Partner
November 29, 2023
"The more specific a story gets, the more universal the themes are felt by everybody."
Dan WillisEnterprise Storytelling Sessions
June 3, 2019
"If you feel like a doormat trying to earn your place in design, sometimes the best advice is to change jobs."
John Maeda Alison RandAbout Design Organizations (Videoconference)
May 13, 2019
"Two-thirds of my Enterprise UX slack channel reported late or lost deliveries—an embarrassing result for such a large company."
Anat Fintzi Rachel MinnicksDelivering at Scale: Making Traction with Resistant Partners
June 9, 2022
"The seven-foot-wide diagram showed the product’s true complexity, sparking necessary conversations with leadership."
Uday GajendarThe Wicked Craft of Enterprise UX
May 13, 2015
"Alana brought a perspective around organization design and synthesizing different points of view."
Kristin SkinnerTheme 1 Intro
September 29, 2021
"Singapore is a nation by design. Nothing we have today is natural or happened by itself—somebody thought about it and made it happen."
Maish NichaniSparking a Service Excellence Mindset at a Government Agency
December 9, 2021
