Key Insights

• •

  Building a panel of participants with diverse accessibility needs requires focusing on their specific user needs rather than asking directly about disabilities.

• •

  Tapping into existing communities—customers, employees, or vendors—is often easier than building a new accessibility panel from scratch.

• •

  Removing friction in booking sessions and engaging with participants increases panel responsiveness and research efficiency.

• •

  Inclusive design benefits from involving participants at multiple stages: understanding needs, prototype reviews, and usability testing with rapid iteration and smaller groups.

• •

  Tailoring user research sessions to participants’ assistive technology needs, like enabling captions or providing screen sharing control, is essential for meaningful feedback.

• •

  Automated accessibility testing tools are valuable at scale but must be combined with user testing to catch issues automated tools miss.

• •

  Accessibility in design systems starts with foundational elements such as color contrast and font weight, which should be validated with real users beyond guideline compliance.

• •

  Testing accessible components in production is crucial to identify conflicts or accessibility regressions that can occur post-implementation.

• •

  Good accessibility documentation and clear processes for engaging panels help scale inclusive design activities across teams.

• •

  Integrating accessibility research within general user research can maintain study sizes while improving usability for all users, because accessible design often benefits everyone.

Notable Quotes