How Your Organization's Generative Workshops Are Probably Going Wrong and How to Get Them Right
Summary
Contrary to popular belief, a design sprint is a highly structured and carefully designed series of exercises, not a brainstorm, design jam or free-for-all. The whole point is to drive a cross-functional team to the right outcome, and this requires a set of structured exercises which weave the thread of user needs, behaviors and attitudes throughout. This involves more than reviewing the research at the start and then moving on to create without that research in context.
A true design sprint takes us from user insights -- even broad user insights -- to user-evaluated concepts or designs. The generative phase of a product is deeply impactful, and design sprints are a fantastic tool for driving this needed impact. However, many are practicing brainstorms or design jams rather than true design sprints. One can make a mismatched concept extremely usable throughout the product development process, but that will not remedy the fact that it is not the right concept.
Researchers are ideal design sprint organizers and facilitators, but researchers are sometimes not even considered a critical component of the sprint. It's important for knowledgeable researchers to drive design sprint impact.
Key Insights
-
•
Many generative workshops fail due to fundamental mistakes more often than they succeed.
-
•
The 'Sprint as theater' mistake occurs when workshops are done for appearances or political reasons rather than genuine product development.
-
•
Well-structured workshops with specific exercises are crucial to move from research data to human-centered product concepts.
-
•
Integrating research both before and after a workshop grounds concepts in real human needs and allows recovery if initial research is missing.
-
•
Excluding key decision-makers leads to surprise blockers after workshops and risks misalignment with product goals.
-
•
Facilitation is a distinct, practiced skill essential to managing group dynamics, pacing, and adapting exercises during workshops.
-
•
Scaling back workshops too much compromises their effectiveness and the quality of resulting concepts.
-
•
Explicit communication about workshop outcomes and quality is necessary to help stakeholders appreciate the method's value.
-
•
Training facilitators in focused, incremental sessions delivers practical skills necessary for leading effective workshops.
-
•
Ensuring equal participation requires setting clear engagement rules and providing tool training to accommodate varying skill levels.
Notable Quotes
"The outcome of this method really makes the difference between lightning and a lightning bug."
"Sprint as theater is not going to result in a product concept that really represents human needs, behaviors, and attitudes."
"If there is no structured way to move from data to concept, you often end up with just a brainstorm, not a grounded concept."
"Lack of research before or after the workshop can be recovered from but at some cost to the concept’s validity."
"Excluding key people might save time but it often leads to surprise blockers and misaligned decisions later on."
"Facilitation is a skill that takes real practice; it’s about managing personalities, stamina, and knowing when to adapt exercises."
"There is a point where scaling back a workshop too much will make it ineffective and that trade-off must be explicit."
"Many stakeholders don’t inherently understand the difference in quality outcomes from workshops, so we must be explicit."
"Getting to know what people care about in the organization helps tailor workshops to support those goals and gain buy-in."
"It’s important to create a sincere environment where everyone feels they can equally participate, regardless of title or skill level."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Design thinking can feel like a magical black box or utterly overwhelming; it has to be made immediately usable and valuable."
Erin HauberDesign is Not the Frosting on the Scaled Agile Layer Cake
October 24, 2019
"You need to believe what you’re doing is the right approach. You need to believe in your own skills and your team’s skills."
Megan KiersteadYou Are a Badass at UX: Overcoming Imposter Syndrome
March 10, 2021
"Working at Uber requires grit."
Maggie DieringerCreating Consistency Through Constant Change
January 8, 2024
"Change management is not just announcements—it starts with user research and goes through to release and beyond."
Meaghan Waters Fotina KoutropoulousLack of Product Thinking will Doom Your Legacy Modernization
June 9, 2021
"We can’t expect all researchers to switch seamlessly across methods without training and time."
Jemma AhmedBringing together market and user research
October 17, 2019
"Trust is a major enabler for tacit knowledge sharing because people must feel safe to be vulnerable and share their knowledge."
Maria TaylorKnowledge is Power: Managing the Lifeblood of the Design Org
October 3, 2023
"Accessibility is now considered not just a moral necessity and a human right but a business good because accessible products are better and easier for everyone to use."
Sam ProulxUnderstanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
June 6, 2023
"Project leadership can be at any level; the right discipline leads, not necessarily the most senior person."
Catherine BlizzardUsing Integrated Insight to Drive Growth
March 10, 2022
"Do I find a way to make this conversation more about the software as scheduled or do I show Laura how to react to the unplanned?"
Randolph Duke IIWar Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II
March 30, 2020
