Summary
Participant recruitment is often regarded as the most difficult part of any design project. Oftentimes companies rely on recruiting agencies to handle finding participants. While there are some advantages to this approach, and cases where outsourcing is the best option, nowadays bringing research in-house can be simple, flexible, cost-effective, and fast. During this session we’ll be diving into the top 5 benefits of bringing your recruitment efforts in house.
Key Insights
-
•
Outsourced recruitment panels typically require 2-4 weeks lead time due to quoting, coordination, and screening processes.
-
•
In-house recruitment via User Interviews can enable same-day project launches and recruitment starts.
-
•
Greater transparency from in-house recruitment allows researchers to review applications and screening responses directly, improving data quality.
-
•
Fraud detection and automatic refunds for invalid participants are built into User Interviews, minimizing data contamination and wasted costs.
-
•
Recruitment panels can charge hidden fees such as expedited fees, cancellation fees, double-screening fees, and contact data fees.
-
•
User Interviews reduces cost per recruit to around $45-$90, significantly cheaper than outsourcing international or professional participant recruitment.
-
•
Direct participant contact in-house facilitates trust-building, quick rescheduling, and real-time troubleshooting during sessions.
-
•
Calendar syncing and stakeholder collaboration in User Interviews help prevent double bookings and enable flexible scheduling.
-
•
User Interviews supports both consumer and professional (B2B) participant targeting, allowing filtering by company size, industry, and job title.
-
•
Maintaining participant engagement with frequent communication and avoiding scheduling sessions more than two weeks out reduces no-shows.
Notable Quotes
"When you’re working with a panel, you typically have about two weeks lead time just to get the quoting and recruitment started."
"I went from brainstorming to launching a recruiting project all in the same day with no external meetings or quotes."
"Sometimes screening can be done incorrectly by panels, which affects your data and might require costly re-screening."
"We never charge you for a participant that turns out to be fraudulent or doesn’t qualify, and we help refund and replace them."
"Recruitment fees through panels can balloon to $600 per participant due to international and professional targeting costs."
"Participant communication is a soft spot for me — being able to humanize the outreach really builds trust."
"Panels often only provide contact info after scheduling, making rescheduling or problem solving very difficult."
"Syncing calendars lets you see free time blocks across your team without exposing exact calendar details."
"Scheduling sessions too far in advance risks participants forgetting and increases no-shows."
"Double screening plus a quick pre-session call helps verify that participants are genuine and qualified for the study."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
More Videos
"Breathing and resisting the urge to rush is essential because rushing will not help."
Magdalena ZadaraZero Hour: How to Get Far Quickly When Starting Your Digital Service Unit Late
November 16, 2022
"Community advisory boards were included as reviewers of findings to ensure accurate portrayal of stories."
Sarah FathallahLessening the Research Burden on Vulnerable Communities
March 30, 2020
"Frontline staff tend to have the least amount of power of all these people in the system."
Shanti Mathew Natalie Sims Natalia RadywylCivic Design at Scale: Introducing the Public Policy Layer Cake
December 9, 2021
"Every site visit to a cancer center leaves us with raw, humbling personal experiences that inspire our work."
Barb SpantonDoing Work That Matters: A Look Beyond The Idealistic Notion of 'Doing Meaningful Work'
June 10, 2022
"Qualitative data is rich and reveals why users behave a certain way; don’t misuse it with numeric summaries that teach the wrong lesson."
Research Operations at Scale
November 7, 2017
"Researchers have really taken it on the chin during this latest economic downturn."
Louis Rosenfeld Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
March 27, 2023
"Customer-centric research is inherently silo-busting because customers experience the whole journey, not isolated departmental pieces."
Robin BeersResearch as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation
March 12, 2021
"Updating and adopting design system components requires company time and planning—for some teams, fast release cycles were too frequent to keep up."
Charles Lee Jennie YipBuilding a New Home for the Atlassian Design System (Videoconference)
October 22, 2020
"I’m actually a really big failure because nine out of 10 tests that we ran failed to show positive impact."
Erin WeigelUX Lessons from running more than 1,200 A/B Tests (Videoconference)
July 10, 2024
