Summary
Participant recruitment is often regarded as the most difficult part of any design project. Oftentimes companies rely on recruiting agencies to handle finding participants. While there are some advantages to this approach, and cases where outsourcing is the best option, nowadays bringing research in-house can be simple, flexible, cost-effective, and fast. During this session we’ll be diving into the top 5 benefits of bringing your recruitment efforts in house.
Key Insights
-
•
Outsourced recruitment panels typically require 2-4 weeks lead time due to quoting, coordination, and screening processes.
-
•
In-house recruitment via User Interviews can enable same-day project launches and recruitment starts.
-
•
Greater transparency from in-house recruitment allows researchers to review applications and screening responses directly, improving data quality.
-
•
Fraud detection and automatic refunds for invalid participants are built into User Interviews, minimizing data contamination and wasted costs.
-
•
Recruitment panels can charge hidden fees such as expedited fees, cancellation fees, double-screening fees, and contact data fees.
-
•
User Interviews reduces cost per recruit to around $45-$90, significantly cheaper than outsourcing international or professional participant recruitment.
-
•
Direct participant contact in-house facilitates trust-building, quick rescheduling, and real-time troubleshooting during sessions.
-
•
Calendar syncing and stakeholder collaboration in User Interviews help prevent double bookings and enable flexible scheduling.
-
•
User Interviews supports both consumer and professional (B2B) participant targeting, allowing filtering by company size, industry, and job title.
-
•
Maintaining participant engagement with frequent communication and avoiding scheduling sessions more than two weeks out reduces no-shows.
Notable Quotes
"When you’re working with a panel, you typically have about two weeks lead time just to get the quoting and recruitment started."
"I went from brainstorming to launching a recruiting project all in the same day with no external meetings or quotes."
"Sometimes screening can be done incorrectly by panels, which affects your data and might require costly re-screening."
"We never charge you for a participant that turns out to be fraudulent or doesn’t qualify, and we help refund and replace them."
"Recruitment fees through panels can balloon to $600 per participant due to international and professional targeting costs."
"Participant communication is a soft spot for me — being able to humanize the outreach really builds trust."
"Panels often only provide contact info after scheduling, making rescheduling or problem solving very difficult."
"Syncing calendars lets you see free time blocks across your team without exposing exact calendar details."
"Scheduling sessions too far in advance risks participants forgetting and increases no-shows."
"Double screening plus a quick pre-session call helps verify that participants are genuine and qualified for the study."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"A good story that people can retell is key for global communication, even if it distorts a bit."
Adam Cutler Karen Pascoe Ian Swinson Susan WorthmanDiscussion
June 8, 2016
"Knowing your subject matter as a UX leader is just as important as knowing your craft."
Peter MerholzThe Trials and Tribulations of Directors of UX (Videoconference)
July 13, 2023
"Everything that has been put online, someone like us made and put there; we bake our own biases into it."
Lisa WelchmanCleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers
June 14, 2018
"Transportation must evolve to be more sustainable and accessible for all."
Vincent BrathwaiteOpener: Past, Present, and Future—Closing the Racial Divide in Design Teams
October 22, 2020
"The squad model flopped for us after six months but created culture triads that stuck around."
Brenna FallonLearning Over Outcomes
October 24, 2019
"Most organizations are still asking design questions at a global level; we need to be hyper-local now."
Tricia WangSpatial Collapse: Designing for Emergent Culture
January 8, 2024
"We used a Python algorithm with a correlation matrix to identify meaningful clusters from survey responses."
Edgar Anzaldua MorenoUsing Research to Determine Unique Value Proposition
March 11, 2021
"Our brains are terrible at operating only on one type of information, whether object-oriented or context-oriented."
Designing Systems at Scale
November 7, 2018
"A lot of developers are way too confident they write perfect code; testing bug fixes often reveals hidden issues."
Erin WeigelGet Your Whole Team Testing to Design for Impact
July 24, 2024
