Broad Strokes: Connecting Design, Research, and AI to the World Around Us
Summary
AI-based modeling plays an ever-increasing role in our daily lives. Our personal data and preferences are being used to build models that serve up anything from movie recommendations to medical services with a precision designed to make life decisions easier. But, what happens when those models are not precise enough or are unusable because of incomplete data, incorrect interpretations, or questionable ethics? What's more, how do we reconcile the dynamic and iterative nature of AI models (which are developed by a few) with the expansive nature of the human experience (which is defined by many) so that we optimize and scale UX for AI applications equitably? This talk will push our understanding of the sociotechnical systems that surround AI technologies, including those developing the models (i.e., model creators) and those for whom the models are created (i.e., model customers). What considerations should we keep top of mind? How might the research practice evolve to help us critique and deliver inclusive and responsible AI systems?
Key Insights
-
•
AI systems in healthcare often embed racial biases that exacerbate disparities, particularly impacting Black and Hispanic populations.
-
•
Algorithms based on past healthcare spending can unfairly dictate future levels of care, disadvantaging poorer patients.
-
•
AI hiring tools can perpetuate bias by training on historically discriminatory data, reducing trust among candidates.
-
•
Dark patterns in UI design, when combined with AI, may manipulate users into unintended decisions, especially vulnerable groups.
-
•
Deepfakes, created via AI neural networks, pose serious risks of misinformation, reputational harm, and psychological damage.
-
•
Facial recognition software shows significant racial and gender bias, performing worst on darker-skinned females as shown by Joy Buolamwini.
-
•
Biases in AI extend beyond technical factors to include systemic and human biases embedded in organizations and data collection.
-
•
Ethical failures like the Tuskegee Syphilis Study highlight the urgency of integrating ethics and do-no-harm principles into AI research and design.
-
•
Women and minorities remain vastly underrepresented in technical AI roles, limiting the diversity of perspectives in AI development.
-
•
Emerging regulations like GDPR and CPRA hold organizations accountable for ethical data use, reinforcing the responsibility of AI practitioners.
Notable Quotes
"Imagine going to the hospital for an emergency and the doctor doesn’t believe you’re in pain because AI says so."
"Algorithms that adjust care based on race don’t actually help and embed disparities instead."
"Dark patterns are not new in UX, but AI amplifies their impact by deceiving users in new ways."
"Deepfakes can disrupt democratic elections and inflict lasting psychological harm on victims."
"Biases out of sight are biases out of mind — facial recognition misidentifies Black faces leading to false arrests."
"All commercially available facial recognition software perform worse on darker females."
"Doing no harm is a core tenet of user experience research, whether or not you are trained in IRB processes."
"Only 12% of AI researchers globally are women, and 6% of professional software developers are women of color."
"Policy like the California Privacy Rights Act requires us to explain data use and comply with user deletion requests."
"The best transformation happens by asking the right questions, even when the problem feels overwhelming."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Being human, authentic, humble, and showing vulnerability can take you a long way as a research leader."
Anna Avrekh Dr. John Pagonis Klara Pelcl Sina SchreiberExpert Panel: Leading in and with Research
March 10, 2022
"AI-driven results are often 30 to 50 percent hallucinogenic—meaning not real—so we need to be cautious about overreliance."
Taylor KlassmanShaping the Next Era of UX Research: Collaborative Forum
March 11, 2025
"We have to figure out the strategic, unique value to our clients, stakeholders, and customers."
Dr. Jamika D. Burge Steve Portigal Alba Villamil Sam LadnerThe Future of Research: Bridging the Gaps
July 29, 2021
"When you test inclusively, you’re learning about the people who will be directly impacted by your work, your users."
Marisa BernsteinIt Takes GRIT: Lessons from the Small, but Mighty World of Civic Usability Testing
December 9, 2021
"Change isn’t disliked as much as the surprise that comes with it—managing expectations makes change more palatable."
Dan Mall“Ask Me Anything” with Dan Mall, Author of Upcoming Rosenfeld Title, Design that Scales
October 2, 2023
"We need to create learning frameworks that allow researchers to be effective, even without big tech pedigree."
Chris GeisonTheme 1 Intro
March 9, 2022
"It’s worth explaining your new communication approach to stakeholders to save their time and foster discussion."
Bruce GillespieLearning from journalism: Balancing impactful communication with compassionate storytelling
March 13, 2025
"We all want to design for scale, but empathy alone is sometimes a shortcoming when thinking about scale."
Nancy DouyonWe'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex
June 15, 2018
"Will you become an advocate for the world’s most vulnerable voices muffled and unheard in complex systems?"
Liz EbengoThe Burden on Children: The Cost of Insufficient Post-Conflict Services and Pathways Forward
December 4, 2024
