The GE Design System and Thoughts about Craft at Scale
Summary
Dave, head of a 50-person UX team at GE software, recounts how they tackled massive design challenges in a huge, decentralized company by developing a modular design system. Starting in 2011 under the leadership of Greg Petrov, their team was small but ambitious, aiming to bring consistent user experiences to thousands of software developers scattered throughout GE’s vast industrial ecosystem. Inspired by traditional industrial design and presentations like Mike Lemmon’s on interaction design languages, they shifted from rigid style guides to flexible, Lego-like toolkits for design and development. Collaborating with Frog Design experts such as Robert Fabricant and Ed Hicks, Dave’s team built a broadly adopted system focused on accelerating development, enabling better prototyping, and supporting consistency without stifling creativity. They discovered that their early system needed better governance, clearer usage guidelines, and easier extensibility, especially as teams demanded variations for marketing and healthcare applications. Today, GE’s UX organization in San Ramon has scaled to 60 designers integrated into cross-functional teams, evolving their design system with richer user insights and technology improvements. Central to their craft is co-creation, rapid prototyping, and maintaining shared understanding with stakeholders, all while continuing to refine the system to support complex industrial data visualization and brand coherence.
Key Insights
-
•
GE’s design challenges stem from being a decentralized matrix with 40,000 developers but fewer than 20 UX designers initially.
-
•
The team shifted from style guides to a Lego-like design system emphasizing tools, not rules, to drive adoption among developers.
-
•
Partnership with Frog Design brought valuable expertise in creating scalable, modular design systems for GE.
-
•
The design system accelerated software development by answering recurring UI questions and providing pre-built components.
-
•
The team saw early success with nearly 20,000 downloads inside GE for the design system, signaling wide adoption.
-
•
Despite adoption, the team acknowledged weaknesses like multiple confusing tab patterns and difficulty extending the system.
-
•
Healthcare and marketing teams created variations for empathy and communication needs, showing design system adaptability.
-
•
Sketches by Hey Studio became effective co-creation tools for storytelling and aligning stakeholders around user needs.
-
•
Moving from an isolated UX studio to embedded, cross-functional teams increased design’s influence across product delivery.
-
•
The evolving craft of UX at GE emphasizes rapid prototyping, co-creation, and shared understanding over just polished visuals.
Notable Quotes
"We landed on the mantra of tools, not rules to drive adoption with developers."
"If we could make something really easy for developers, we would drive adoption and continually improve user experiences."
"We didn’t have enough knowledge initially to have a strong opinion about what was good design for these users."
"A lot of people were just going and downloading the tear sheet, which is to be expected."
"We found that different failure modes of equipment have different spatial signatures on spider web charts."
"The most important thing about the design system is that it’s already coded — designers and devs just use it."
"It’s very tempting to bypass the sketching step and jump straight to high-fidelity prototypes — proceed with caution."
"We resisted the temptation to squash diversity of usage because we thought we’d learn from it."
"Prototyping and co-creation workshops have been a huge accelerant to the design process."
"Our craft today is about forming shared understanding and building prototypes, not just delivering polished visuals."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Roles are evolving with automation, but the shift toward skills is what will define future jobs."
Lavy Kumar Kat Temple Shan Sebastian Tara Jensen Jenn ChouFuture of Work
June 9, 2021
"Research and design together tell a continuous story that guides what problems we tackle and how we solve them."
Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig BrookesWhat Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?
March 11, 2021
"Regular surveys showed teaching quality mattered 11%, but logistic regression revealed it actually represents 77% of the decision."
Ricardo MartinsUnlocking the power of advanced quantitative methods
March 12, 2025
"If you get enough good behavior going on, the system corrects itself and susses out the bad."
Monty HammontreeThe Future of UX Research
December 3, 2020
"We didn’t explain the philosophy behind the design ops activities, so others didn’t understand why some activities couldn’t be done outside design."
Benjamin RealShowing the Value of DesignOps by Not Having a DesignOps Team
October 21, 2020
"Some people have been doing research ops a lot longer than the term has existed."
Kate TowseyAsk Me Anything (AMA) with Kate Towsey
April 2, 2025
"Building an internal research practice is critical for long-term value and integration of insights."
Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian RohrerDiscussion
May 13, 2015
"The more payment providers you offer, the higher the chance everyone can pick what works best for them."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
March 28, 2023
"Hover is very difficult for users who use switch systems or head mice because they can only click or not click and have trouble holding steady to hover."
Sam ProulxPrototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
October 1, 2021
