The GE Design System and Thoughts about Craft at Scale
Summary
Dave, head of a 50-person UX team at GE software, recounts how they tackled massive design challenges in a huge, decentralized company by developing a modular design system. Starting in 2011 under the leadership of Greg Petrov, their team was small but ambitious, aiming to bring consistent user experiences to thousands of software developers scattered throughout GE’s vast industrial ecosystem. Inspired by traditional industrial design and presentations like Mike Lemmon’s on interaction design languages, they shifted from rigid style guides to flexible, Lego-like toolkits for design and development. Collaborating with Frog Design experts such as Robert Fabricant and Ed Hicks, Dave’s team built a broadly adopted system focused on accelerating development, enabling better prototyping, and supporting consistency without stifling creativity. They discovered that their early system needed better governance, clearer usage guidelines, and easier extensibility, especially as teams demanded variations for marketing and healthcare applications. Today, GE’s UX organization in San Ramon has scaled to 60 designers integrated into cross-functional teams, evolving their design system with richer user insights and technology improvements. Central to their craft is co-creation, rapid prototyping, and maintaining shared understanding with stakeholders, all while continuing to refine the system to support complex industrial data visualization and brand coherence.
Key Insights
-
•
GE’s design challenges stem from being a decentralized matrix with 40,000 developers but fewer than 20 UX designers initially.
-
•
The team shifted from style guides to a Lego-like design system emphasizing tools, not rules, to drive adoption among developers.
-
•
Partnership with Frog Design brought valuable expertise in creating scalable, modular design systems for GE.
-
•
The design system accelerated software development by answering recurring UI questions and providing pre-built components.
-
•
The team saw early success with nearly 20,000 downloads inside GE for the design system, signaling wide adoption.
-
•
Despite adoption, the team acknowledged weaknesses like multiple confusing tab patterns and difficulty extending the system.
-
•
Healthcare and marketing teams created variations for empathy and communication needs, showing design system adaptability.
-
•
Sketches by Hey Studio became effective co-creation tools for storytelling and aligning stakeholders around user needs.
-
•
Moving from an isolated UX studio to embedded, cross-functional teams increased design’s influence across product delivery.
-
•
The evolving craft of UX at GE emphasizes rapid prototyping, co-creation, and shared understanding over just polished visuals.
Notable Quotes
"We landed on the mantra of tools, not rules to drive adoption with developers."
"If we could make something really easy for developers, we would drive adoption and continually improve user experiences."
"We didn’t have enough knowledge initially to have a strong opinion about what was good design for these users."
"A lot of people were just going and downloading the tear sheet, which is to be expected."
"We found that different failure modes of equipment have different spatial signatures on spider web charts."
"The most important thing about the design system is that it’s already coded — designers and devs just use it."
"It’s very tempting to bypass the sketching step and jump straight to high-fidelity prototypes — proceed with caution."
"We resisted the temptation to squash diversity of usage because we thought we’d learn from it."
"Prototyping and co-creation workshops have been a huge accelerant to the design process."
"Our craft today is about forming shared understanding and building prototypes, not just delivering polished visuals."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If you’re not embarrassed by what you share, you’ll share too late."
Iain McMaster IHan ChengDesign and Product: from Frenemy to Harmony
November 29, 2023
"OKRs help highlight intentions to leadership and open up conversations that generate alignment and support."
Bria Alexander Benson Low Natalya Pemberton Stephanie GoldthorpeOKRs—Helpful or Harmful?
January 20, 2022
"Participatory sessions provide a unique chance to connect with users who might otherwise be hard to reach."
Nidhi Singh Rathore Amber DavisEmbracing participation to unlock deeper truths in commercial research
March 12, 2025
"Users are smart, innovative, and a lot of the innovation actually comes from users rather than big companies."
Prayag Narula Rida QadriHCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer
March 28, 2023
"It’s not like you can go down to the corner store, pick out the right brand of design ops, and sprinkle it everywhere."
Dan WillisFilling the Void
November 7, 2018
"Research doesn’t start and end with the researcher; it’s about continual learning and supporting communities to keep learning."
Robert Fabricant Sahibzada Mayed Nidhi Singh RathoreIndustry junctures: Paths forwards for UXR and the critical decisions that get us there [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
October 2, 2024
"By orchestrating more collaborative activities, secondary research reduces the risk of knowledge siloing."
Cara Maritz Rachel NyThe Art of Extrapolation
March 29, 2023
"Paternalistic judgments from lawmakers can be tangibly harmful, leading to lack of funding for basic services and policies."
Yasmine KhanChecking Bias and Listening to Financially Vulnerable Americans
March 30, 2020
"I feel good about the work I do, but my company doesn't ship good work."
Peter MerholzThe 2025 State of UX/Design Organizational Health
November 12, 2025
