The GE Design System and Thoughts about Craft at Scale
Summary
Dave, head of a 50-person UX team at GE software, recounts how they tackled massive design challenges in a huge, decentralized company by developing a modular design system. Starting in 2011 under the leadership of Greg Petrov, their team was small but ambitious, aiming to bring consistent user experiences to thousands of software developers scattered throughout GE’s vast industrial ecosystem. Inspired by traditional industrial design and presentations like Mike Lemmon’s on interaction design languages, they shifted from rigid style guides to flexible, Lego-like toolkits for design and development. Collaborating with Frog Design experts such as Robert Fabricant and Ed Hicks, Dave’s team built a broadly adopted system focused on accelerating development, enabling better prototyping, and supporting consistency without stifling creativity. They discovered that their early system needed better governance, clearer usage guidelines, and easier extensibility, especially as teams demanded variations for marketing and healthcare applications. Today, GE’s UX organization in San Ramon has scaled to 60 designers integrated into cross-functional teams, evolving their design system with richer user insights and technology improvements. Central to their craft is co-creation, rapid prototyping, and maintaining shared understanding with stakeholders, all while continuing to refine the system to support complex industrial data visualization and brand coherence.
Key Insights
-
•
GE’s design challenges stem from being a decentralized matrix with 40,000 developers but fewer than 20 UX designers initially.
-
•
The team shifted from style guides to a Lego-like design system emphasizing tools, not rules, to drive adoption among developers.
-
•
Partnership with Frog Design brought valuable expertise in creating scalable, modular design systems for GE.
-
•
The design system accelerated software development by answering recurring UI questions and providing pre-built components.
-
•
The team saw early success with nearly 20,000 downloads inside GE for the design system, signaling wide adoption.
-
•
Despite adoption, the team acknowledged weaknesses like multiple confusing tab patterns and difficulty extending the system.
-
•
Healthcare and marketing teams created variations for empathy and communication needs, showing design system adaptability.
-
•
Sketches by Hey Studio became effective co-creation tools for storytelling and aligning stakeholders around user needs.
-
•
Moving from an isolated UX studio to embedded, cross-functional teams increased design’s influence across product delivery.
-
•
The evolving craft of UX at GE emphasizes rapid prototyping, co-creation, and shared understanding over just polished visuals.
Notable Quotes
"We landed on the mantra of tools, not rules to drive adoption with developers."
"If we could make something really easy for developers, we would drive adoption and continually improve user experiences."
"We didn’t have enough knowledge initially to have a strong opinion about what was good design for these users."
"A lot of people were just going and downloading the tear sheet, which is to be expected."
"We found that different failure modes of equipment have different spatial signatures on spider web charts."
"The most important thing about the design system is that it’s already coded — designers and devs just use it."
"It’s very tempting to bypass the sketching step and jump straight to high-fidelity prototypes — proceed with caution."
"We resisted the temptation to squash diversity of usage because we thought we’d learn from it."
"Prototyping and co-creation workshops have been a huge accelerant to the design process."
"Our craft today is about forming shared understanding and building prototypes, not just delivering polished visuals."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The transition from hands-on research to managing is a big mind shift where outcomes become more intangible."
Anna Avrekh Dr. John Pagonis Klara Pelcl Sina SchreiberExpert Panel: Leading in and with Research
March 10, 2022
"In a remote environment, building authentic, deep relationships with stakeholders is a key skill for researchers."
Taylor KlassmanShaping the Next Era of UX Research: Collaborative Forum
March 11, 2025
"Our standard research frameworks and tools are often inadequate for addressing complex social problems."
Dr. Jamika D. Burge Steve Portigal Alba Villamil Sam LadnerThe Future of Research: Bridging the Gaps
July 29, 2021
"Compensation is so important to thank people for their time, and you will definitely build your recruitment pool much faster if you offer it."
Marisa BernsteinIt Takes GRIT: Lessons from the Small, but Mighty World of Civic Usability Testing
December 9, 2021
"Design systems teams are most effective when they focus on serving the components and processes needed at scale by many teams."
Dan Mall“Ask Me Anything” with Dan Mall, Author of Upcoming Rosenfeld Title, Design that Scales
October 2, 2023
"The futures the field seeks to shape are typically more immediate than those studied by futurists."
Chris GeisonTheme 1 Intro
March 9, 2022
"It’s worth explaining your new communication approach to stakeholders to save their time and foster discussion."
Bruce GillespieLearning from journalism: Balancing impactful communication with compassionate storytelling
March 13, 2025
"We Westerners are designing for ourselves without realizing it, feeding back into a loop of luxury products."
Nancy DouyonWe'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex
June 15, 2018
"Knowing your positionality and having native speakers and culturally sensitive methods is vital for authentic data gathering."
Liz EbengoThe Burden on Children: The Cost of Insufficient Post-Conflict Services and Pathways Forward
December 4, 2024
