Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Discussion
Gold
Thursday, May 14, 2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Share the love for this talk
Discussion
Speakers: Marc Rettig , Julie Baher , Phil Gilbert and Nathan Shedroff
Link:

Summary

Phil and Nathan share experiences and strategies for embedding design thinking in large, complex organizations. Phil recounts his journey at IBM since 2010, leading a distributed design program that empowers designers within business units rather than centralizing them. He explains how the program grew organically starting in 2012 and is built to last decades, prioritizing a safe executive channel paired with grassroots adoption. Nathan focuses on the importance of relationship as a foundation for value in organizations and design culture. He explains that culture is formed through relationships and deliberate conversations, and that knowing oneself and others is key. Both speakers emphasize shifting organizational conversations from persuasion to experience-based change, with Nathan advocating doing ethnographic research within organizations to align language and interests. They address challenges of risk-taking in innovation, navigating organizational resistance, and how design thinking can help run the change program itself. Practical tactics also involve listening deeply without judgment, co-creation across silos, and reframing risk as hypothesis testing. Phil and Nathan discuss hiring strategies balancing youthful openness and experience, and how design must speak the language of business to gain traction. The overall message is about maturing design into an organizational force by building authentic relationships, listening, and creating room for experimentation within business constraints.

Key Insights

  • Culture change is more effective through experiential learning and doing design rather than merely persuading through theory.

  • Phil’s IBM design program avoids a centralized studio model; designers are embedded in business units with matrix reporting to maintain influence and autonomy.

  • Strong relationships are foundational for culture and value creation but are difficult to represent and discuss explicitly in organizations.

  • Design programs succeed when they have both grassroots team-level adoption and an executive-level safe outlet for reporting dysfunction.

  • Risk-taking is essential for innovation, but organizations must balance acceptable risk with mitigation, often requiring collaborative conversations between design, legal, and finance.

  • Listening deeply to individuals across silos without judgment builds trust and opens opportunities for meaningful collaboration and co-creation.

  • Meaning, emotion, and identity often matter more than features or price, especially when buyers differ from end users in B2B contexts.

  • Hiring mixes entry-level and experienced designers to balance openness to learning with practical knowledge, avoiding both close-mindedness and overly rigid mindsets.

  • Organizational change efforts often fail by becoming check-box processes; finding early wins and allies helps make programs credible and scalable.

  • Designers need to adapt their language to align with business goals, effectively 'speaking the language' of leaders to gain influence.

Notable Quotes

"It’s about design doing, not just talking about design theory."

"Without relationship there is no value. You can’t have culture without relationships either."

"Every one of those hundred teams self-selected in. They want in and they’re trying to do the right thing."

"A leader is someone who clearly communicates a vision that other people want to follow."

"Find some allies and get some wins to prove that change can take root in your company."

"Most people come to work not to make their life harder or to build crappy products."

"We rejected a studio model because designers need to be part of business teams taking direction from them."

"Listening deeply without judgment is maturing design research into active leadership."

"Risk conversations are less about risk or no risk and more about acceptable risk balanced against opportunity value."

"The program is built to last until 2025 and 2030, not just to deliver short-term outcomes."

Ask the Rosenbot
Abbey Smalley
Scaling UX Past the Size of Your Team
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Robin Beers
Research as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Zariah Cameron
ReDesigning Wellbeing for Equitable Care in the Workplace
2024 • DesignOps 2024
Gold
Ed Mullen
Designing the Unseen: Enabling Institutions to Build Public Trust
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Matt Duignan
Atomizing Research: Trend or Trap
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Yunyan Li
UX Best Practices
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Steve Sanderson
Discussion
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
The Bigger Picture: A Panel Discussion
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Edgar Anzaldua Moreno
Using Research to Determine Unique Value Proposition
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Jorge Arango
[Demo] How to re-categorize content at scale using LLMs
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Adel Du Toit
Get Your CFO To Say: 'Our Strategic Goal is User Obsession'
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Trauma-Responsive Design: Reimagining the Future of Design Now
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
How AI will Change DesignOps Tooling
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Sam Proulx
Mobile Accessibility and You
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Sam Proulx
SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Prabhas Pokharel
Order and Chaos: New Ways of Collaborating on Synthesis and Storytelling
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold

More Videos

"When teams lose a sense of agency, they act strange, cutting corners and racing to get something out the door."

Standardizing Product Merits for Leaders, Designers, and Everyone

June 15, 2018

Simon Wardley

"The only people who can effectively map a space are those who work and understand that space intimately."

Simon Wardley

Maps and Topographical Intelligence (Videoconference)

January 31, 2019

Sandra Camacho

"The Twitter algorithm favored lighter skin tones when cropping images, reflecting racial bias in tech."

Sandra Camacho

Creating More Bias-Proof Designs

January 22, 2025

Darian Davis

"Reviewing decision points creates a source of truth and makes it harder to forget or scrap earlier agreements."

Darian Davis

Lessons from a Toxic Work Relationship

January 8, 2024

Fisayo Osilaja

"After each interview, I input the transcript into ChatGPT and ask for three key takeaways that I can quickly share with stakeholders."

Fisayo Osilaja

[Demo] The AI edge: From researcher to strategist

June 4, 2024

Uday Gajendar

"Empowering maker culture invites everyone to be part of a collective endeavor far beyond any individual."

Uday Gajendar

The Wicked Craft of Enterprise UX

May 13, 2015

Davis Neable

"Consistency over business unit efficiency was a design principle to ensure unified interface and language."

Davis Neable Guy Segal

How to Drive a Design Project When you Don’t Have a Design Team

June 10, 2021

Eniola Oluwole

"TripAdvisor is really nine major business units each thinking like sub companies instead of one end-to-end user experience."

Eniola Oluwole

Lessons From the DesignOps Journey of the World's Largest Travel Site

October 24, 2019

Aurobinda Pradhan

"The operational glue that binds strategy, execution, and measurement in design is often missing, and that’s critical for scaling."

Aurobinda Pradhan Shashank Deshpande

Introduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts

September 9, 2022