Discussion
Summary
Karen recounts how she helped grow GE Healthcare's design group from 28 to 60 people by acting as internal consultants across GE divisions during tough economic times. She partnered with design firms like Intersection to develop journey mapping tools and emphasized the involvement of business stakeholders alongside designers. On hiring the first diverse or non-traditional candidates, Karen stresses early alignment on criteria and seeking external community support to fairly evaluate and onboard these hires. Sam highlights the importance of using user research to pitch UX value in legacy-technical environments, leveraging real user frustrations captured in quotes and videos to create empathy and buy-in from skeptical stakeholders. Both underline the significance of focusing on measurable task success, error rates, confidence, and user delight when evaluating UX outcomes. They also share lessons from organizing “delight forums” aimed at building shared UX language inside organizations, noting their inspirational but limited practical impact. The conversation provides actionable strategies for scaling UX teams, engaging stakeholders, and making user-centered design tangible in complex, technical enterprises.
Key Insights
-
•
GE Healthcare's design group grew by acting as internal consultants to other GE divisions, funding growth through cross-unit projects.
-
•
Journey mapping was developed in partnership with an external firm, Intersection, to gain fresh perspectives on the user experience.
-
•
Involving business stakeholders alongside designers in journey mapping creates better alignment and broader buy-in.
-
•
Hiring non-traditional candidates requires early alignment on hiring criteria and leveraging external professional design communities.
-
•
Measuring UX success focuses on task completion rates, number of errors, user confidence, and subjective delight.
-
•
Physiological metrics for emotional responses in UX research have limited signal in everyday software usage due to noise.
-
•
“Delight forums” help build shared UX language but have limited impact without translating conversation into action.
-
•
Using authentic user stories and recorded frustrations can be more persuasive than abstract UX arguments when pitching to stakeholders.
-
•
Finding an internal ‘unindicted co-conspirator’ with a real problem helps UX designers demonstrate value practically.
-
•
Focus on where you’re welcomed in an organization to build momentum rather than forcing change where you face resistance.
Notable Quotes
"When I got there in very late ’07, there were about 28 people, now there’s about 60."
"We became entrepreneurs internally, doing work across other GE divisions to generate funding."
"Journey mapping was created with Intersection, founded by Chuck Pelley and Joan Greger, to help us look in the mirror."
"Align on what you’re looking for before the interview to evaluate non-traditional candidates fairly."
"We used standard metrics like task success, time to complete, number of errors, confidence, and delight."
"It’s hard to detect emotional responses physiologically in day-to-day software use because there’s too much noise."
"Delight forums helped us share stories and build a shared vernacular but didn’t lead to significant change by themselves."
"Instead of telling the story, bring in actual users to tell their frustration directly to your team and execs."
"Find an unindicted co-conspirator in your company with a problem you can help solve, and the rest will follow."
"Ignore the people who hate you, embrace those who love you, and focus on the fence sitters."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Ownership of VOC is a hot potato, so we built a coalition with a facilitator to keep it collaborative and effective."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"When we understand organizations as ecosystems, we recognize the need for organic simplicity."
Peter MorvilleThe Architecture of Understanding
May 13, 2015
"Only one internal hire on the UX team was a huge misopportunity for us."
Renee ReidBecoming a ResearchH.E.R (Highly Enterprise Ready)
June 3, 2019
"Our bodies profoundly influence the way that we think about ourselves, others, the world, and everything in it."
Dane DeSutterKeeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not
March 26, 2024
"Multiple payment providers aren’t just a feature; they’re an accessibility lifeline for people who can’t read or reach their credit card easily."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
October 3, 2023
"A thousand paper cuts add up: many small frustrations can lead to someone leaving your digital experience."
Andrew Custage Michael MallettThe Digital Journey: Research on Consumer Frustration and Loyalty
March 29, 2023
"Zoom fatigue is real, people are not necessarily keen to go into another Zoom meeting even if they think it’s valuable."
Shelby SwitzerMaking Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World
December 10, 2021
"Volume is a losing game because we cannot outcompete full AI automation for sheer speed and quantity of insights."
Llewyn PaineCoexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
March 11, 2025
"A metaphor is like a flashlight—it shines on some things and keeps others in the dark."
Robin BeersNavigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change
March 13, 2025
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How important is human involvement in strategic insight generation despite AI advancements?
What cultural or institutional factors hinder innovation and adaptation in design education programs?
What is automation bias and how can UX design mitigate its risks in AI-augmented clinical decision support?