Discussion
Summary
Karen recounts how she helped grow GE Healthcare's design group from 28 to 60 people by acting as internal consultants across GE divisions during tough economic times. She partnered with design firms like Intersection to develop journey mapping tools and emphasized the involvement of business stakeholders alongside designers. On hiring the first diverse or non-traditional candidates, Karen stresses early alignment on criteria and seeking external community support to fairly evaluate and onboard these hires. Sam highlights the importance of using user research to pitch UX value in legacy-technical environments, leveraging real user frustrations captured in quotes and videos to create empathy and buy-in from skeptical stakeholders. Both underline the significance of focusing on measurable task success, error rates, confidence, and user delight when evaluating UX outcomes. They also share lessons from organizing “delight forums” aimed at building shared UX language inside organizations, noting their inspirational but limited practical impact. The conversation provides actionable strategies for scaling UX teams, engaging stakeholders, and making user-centered design tangible in complex, technical enterprises.
Key Insights
-
•
GE Healthcare's design group grew by acting as internal consultants to other GE divisions, funding growth through cross-unit projects.
-
•
Journey mapping was developed in partnership with an external firm, Intersection, to gain fresh perspectives on the user experience.
-
•
Involving business stakeholders alongside designers in journey mapping creates better alignment and broader buy-in.
-
•
Hiring non-traditional candidates requires early alignment on hiring criteria and leveraging external professional design communities.
-
•
Measuring UX success focuses on task completion rates, number of errors, user confidence, and subjective delight.
-
•
Physiological metrics for emotional responses in UX research have limited signal in everyday software usage due to noise.
-
•
“Delight forums” help build shared UX language but have limited impact without translating conversation into action.
-
•
Using authentic user stories and recorded frustrations can be more persuasive than abstract UX arguments when pitching to stakeholders.
-
•
Finding an internal ‘unindicted co-conspirator’ with a real problem helps UX designers demonstrate value practically.
-
•
Focus on where you’re welcomed in an organization to build momentum rather than forcing change where you face resistance.
Notable Quotes
"When I got there in very late ’07, there were about 28 people, now there’s about 60."
"We became entrepreneurs internally, doing work across other GE divisions to generate funding."
"Journey mapping was created with Intersection, founded by Chuck Pelley and Joan Greger, to help us look in the mirror."
"Align on what you’re looking for before the interview to evaluate non-traditional candidates fairly."
"We used standard metrics like task success, time to complete, number of errors, confidence, and delight."
"It’s hard to detect emotional responses physiologically in day-to-day software use because there’s too much noise."
"Delight forums helped us share stories and build a shared vernacular but didn’t lead to significant change by themselves."
"Instead of telling the story, bring in actual users to tell their frustration directly to your team and execs."
"Find an unindicted co-conspirator in your company with a problem you can help solve, and the rest will follow."
"Ignore the people who hate you, embrace those who love you, and focus on the fence sitters."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"It doesn’t matter when work is done, so long as it’s done and its quality."
Lavy Kumar Kat Temple Shan Sebastian Tara Jensen Jenn ChouFuture of Work
June 9, 2021
"Research and design together tell a continuous story that guides what problems we tackle and how we solve them."
Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig BrookesWhat Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?
March 11, 2021
"Regular surveys showed teaching quality mattered 11%, but logistic regression revealed it actually represents 77% of the decision."
Ricardo MartinsUnlocking the power of advanced quantitative methods
March 12, 2025
"Learning invalidates being right as the currency of research and product decisions."
Monty HammontreeThe Future of UX Research
December 3, 2020
"Losing design ops led to missed deadlines, bad experiences for customers, and overstretched design leaders."
Benjamin RealShowing the Value of DesignOps by Not Having a DesignOps Team
October 21, 2020
"Some people have been doing research ops a lot longer than the term has existed."
Kate TowseyAsk Me Anything (AMA) with Kate Towsey
April 2, 2025
"Both tribes really believe in doing awesome for customers, that’s our common ground."
Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian RohrerDiscussion
May 13, 2015
"If it didn’t come from Amazon or Costco, I probably don’t own it because I know the experience will be consistent."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
March 28, 2023
"For screen reader users, you often need to build entirely new prototypes using systems like Microsoft Word or Google Docs to convey semantic information."
Sam ProulxPrototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
October 1, 2021
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are the economic and demographic challenges threatening independent design colleges like CCA?
How should designers prepare for AI-driven cognitive agents that understand emotional personas?
What strategies help speed up the procurement and legal review of UX research platforms in organizations like LinkedIn?