[Demo] Deploying AI doppelgangers to de-identify user research recordings
Summary
Under biometric privacy laws like BIPA and CCPA, user research recordings containing users’ faces or voices can put your company at risk for lawsuits and fines. Legal departments are increasingly requiring more stringent redaction, and in some cases banning recording outright. This comes at a high cost for UX teams who are already being asked to do more with less, as losing access to recordings can increase duplicative research effort and reduce the accuracy of results. AI offers new solutions for UX teams who want to keep research recordings longer without violating biometric privacy laws. In this demo, we’ll show how we used off-the-shelf tools to intelligently redact users’ voices, faces, and bodies in research videos. By removing biometric identifiers, you can compliantly archive research recordings indefinitely, enabling your team to mine them for insights for years to come.
Key Insights
-
•
Biometric privacy laws increasingly restrict recording and retaining user faces and voices in UX research, risking large fines.
-
•
Replacing users with AI-generated avatars preserves the richness of user recordings while protecting privacy.
-
•
Wonder Studio can segment and animate a user's body and face with a 3D avatar fully automatically, simplifying production.
-
•
11 Labs technology enables seamless voice replacement using AI-generated speech in user research videos.
-
•
Replacing the entire body, not just the face, mitigates risks from distinctive identifying marks like tattoos and future privacy laws.
-
•
Traditional redaction methods like blurring or keeping only transcripts are either insufficient or lose valuable context.
-
•
Current AI tools have usage limits, require legal reviews, and sometimes restrictive licensing affecting enterprise use.
-
•
Hosting AI models in-house offers more data control but adds technical complexity compared to cloud-based solutions.
-
•
Using synthetic avatars raises complex ethical questions about authenticity, identity representation, and users' rights to be forgotten.
-
•
Legal risk tolerance varies, so negotiating with legal teams is essential to implement AI avatar redaction in research workflows.
Notable Quotes
"User recordings are your most valuable asset but have become riskier due to biometric privacy laws."
"Even if you’re not doing facial recognition, storing face and voice data is under growing legal scrutiny."
"Blurring user faces loses context and doesn’t address voice privacy, making it an inadequate solution."
"Wonder Studio automatically segments actors, maps their movements to a 3D model, and renders a synthetic avatar video."
"Replacing the entire body with an avatar future-proofs against unanticipated identifiers like tattoos or moles."
"DeepFakes can look too realistic and might introduce new privacy risks if donor faces come from real people."
"Processing limits and licensing terms currently restrict how much video and audio these AI tools can handle."
"Ultimately, AI avatar tools offer UX teams options to keep recordings while meeting legal compliance."
"If you can’t see a human in a video, how do you know the entire conversation wasn’t fabricated?"
"Synthetic duplicates living on after data deletion raise ethical questions about users’ right to be forgotten."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Tags are a balance; project tags are wild and flexible, global tags must be controlled to avoid chaos."
Taylor Jennings Joe Nelson Alex KnollRepository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research
March 9, 2022
"Not everyone has the same capacity to aspire to a future; this is critical when working with marginalized communities."
Nicole AleongFuture Orientations to Everyday Life: Futures Anthropology as a Methodology
March 26, 2024
"The innovation studio bakes in strategic vision, leadership, funding, and ownership."
Jeff GothelfInnovation Studios: the Engines of Enterprise Experimentation
May 14, 2015
"By designing products through the lens of edge cases like disabilities first, they often become better products for everyone."
Saara Kamppari-MillerDesignOps for Inclusive Design and Accessibility
May 26, 2022
"Having questions about team happiness broken into person, team and product helps clear up confusion in large organizations."
Tess DixonC'mon Get Happy
September 29, 2021
"Being intentional about how we spend our time is the purest manifestation of our values and our value."
Liam ThurstonWhy Your Design Team Is Quitting, And How To Fix It
June 10, 2022
"Innovation is about being fearless, breaking rules, and refusing to stop at the way things have always been done."
Ian SwinsonDesigning and Driving UX Careers
June 8, 2016
"My kids know everything. If you listen to conversations with them, they say I know, Ma, I know."
Leisa ReicheltOpening Keynote: Operating in Context
November 7, 2018
"Consistent, gentle support over time creates deeply loyal adopters."
Rachael Greene Alison DavisBuilding a Design Ops Practice that Really Works (Most of the Time)
October 2, 2025
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are the core UX research tools essential for managing participant recruitment and study logistics in large companies?
What are the financial barriers preventing birth centers from operating sustainably in rural areas?
How can researchers integrate multiple stakeholder perspectives into a coherent research narrative?