It Takes GRIT: Lessons from the Small, but Mighty World of Civic Usability Testing
Summary
While usability testing is an often overlooked part of design in the frenzied race to get technology to market, it’s absence is especially problematic when it comes to civic-focused products and services. Even when designers want to test, options are often limited to "professional testers" or personal networks - far from the actual users they’re hoping to help. Testing with a diverse group of end users and stakeholders is the only surefire way to make sure what gets designed works for everyone, but the approach needs to be thoughtful, sensitive and impactful. Since launching in early 2019, GRIT has delivered more than 20 such inclusive usability testing engagements with partners in the public, private and nonprofit sectors and we’re eager to share our insights with others who endeavor to engage diverse, underrepresented communities in the design of their civic products and services. Using case studies and lessons from our trove of civic design engagements, we'll help take the guesswork out of inclusively testing your next design.
Key Insights
-
•
Inclusive usability testing uncovers user needs that would otherwise be missed, especially for vulnerable populations.
-
•
Building a diverse participant pool requires going offline to meet people in their everyday community spaces, not just digital recruitment.
-
•
Offering flexible testing times beyond standard working hours increases participation from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.
-
•
Creating a comfortable, informal testing environment with snacks and a non-intimidating setting improves honest feedback.
-
•
Clear, jargon-free communication and early sharing of consent forms build trust and reduce participant anxiety.
-
•
Maintaining a single point of contact for participants prevents confusion and fosters smoother coordination.
-
•
Compensation at a rate of $1 to $1.25 per minute, reimbursed travel, and prompt payments boost recruitment speed and retention.
-
•
Referrals from satisfied testers can help reach specific demographics and expand testing pools efficiently.
-
•
Longitudinal testing, involving participants multiple times, enhances insights as the product evolves.
-
•
Testing with real users who rely on assistive technologies, like screen readers or voice commands, validates accessibility effectively.
Notable Quotes
"If it doesn’t work for you, it doesn’t work."
"When you test inclusively, you’re learning about the people who will be directly impacted by your work, your users."
"Technology that includes everyone, especially those from vulnerable populations, ensures that what gets built will work for everyone."
"Participant experience is everything and it starts with building trust."
"No surprises. Tell participants everything they’ll be experiencing from who will be in the room to if the session will be recorded."
"Use plain language in all communication. No design or technology jargon."
"Build your pool, build your practice. If you provide a great testing experience, you’ve got another person to add to your group."
"Compensation is so important to thank people for their time, and you will definitely build your recruitment pool much faster if you offer it."
"We intentionally did not email listservs or go on Twitter because that would have delivered a group that is too tech-savvy."
"During testing sensitive subjects, have relevant resources at the ready, like shelter beds for participants in need."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Don’t position yourself as the research expert; you are the expert in facilitating the quest for knowledge."
Anna Avrekh Dr. John Pagonis Klara Pelcl Sina SchreiberExpert Panel: Leading in and with Research
March 10, 2022
"Impact of research is not always immediate or linear; it can be a long-term, complex process to measure."
Taylor KlassmanShaping the Next Era of UX Research: Collaborative Forum
March 11, 2025
"We have to figure out the strategic, unique value to our clients, stakeholders, and customers."
Dr. Jamika D. Burge Steve Portigal Alba Villamil Sam LadnerThe Future of Research: Bridging the Gaps
July 29, 2021
"We intentionally did not email listservs or go on Twitter because that would have delivered a group that is too tech-savvy."
Marisa BernsteinIt Takes GRIT: Lessons from the Small, but Mighty World of Civic Usability Testing
December 9, 2021
"Design systems should capture the reality of your organization, documenting how you work now and where you want to go."
Dan Mall“Ask Me Anything” with Dan Mall, Author of Upcoming Rosenfeld Title, Design that Scales
October 2, 2023
"To do the kind of work we aspire to do, we need to better understand the role of resilience."
Chris GeisonTheme 1 Intro
March 9, 2022
"If someone only reads the first few paragraphs or attends the first 10 minutes, they should still get the key takeaways."
Bruce GillespieLearning from journalism: Balancing impactful communication with compassionate storytelling
March 13, 2025
"We all want to design for scale, but empathy alone is sometimes a shortcoming when thinking about scale."
Nancy DouyonWe'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex
June 15, 2018
"Hope is not passive. Hope is very proactive and requires facilitation that helps people dream despite their harsh realities."
Liz EbengoThe Burden on Children: The Cost of Insufficient Post-Conflict Services and Pathways Forward
December 4, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What are best practices for onboarding and operationalizing UX research tools post-procurement to ensure adoption?
In what ways does the Rosenbot promote self-directed, on-demand learning for UX professionals?
Why is the timeline important when creating a product vision, and what is a realistic timeframe?