Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
Join us for a different type of Quant vs. Qual discussion: instead of discussing how data science and quantitative research methods can power UX research and design, we’re going to talk about designing enterprise data products and tools that put ML and analytics into the hands of users. Does this call for new, different, or modified approaches to UX research and design? Or do these technologies have nothing to do with how we approach design for data products? The session’s host will be Brian T. O’Neill who is also the host of the Experiencing Data podcast and founder of Designing for Analytics, an independent consultancy that helps data products leaders use design-driven innovation to deliver better ML and analytics user experiences. In this session, we’ll be sharing some rapid [slides-optional] anecdotes and stories from the attendees and then open up the conversation to everyone. We hope to get perspectives from both enterprise data teams doing “internal” data analytics or ML/AI solutions development as well as software/tech companies as well who may offer data-related platform tools, intelligence/SAAS products, BI/decision support solutions, etc. Slots are open to both experienced UX practitioners as well as data science / analytics / technical participants who may have participated in design or UX work with colleagues. Please share! If folks are too quiet in the session, you may be subject to a drum or tambourine solo from Brian. Nobody has all of this “figured out yet” and experiments and trials are welcome.
Key Insights
-
•
UX researchers working with ML and data science teams often lack domain expertise, requiring strong facilitation and interpretive interview skills.
-
•
Machine learning product users are usually small specialized expert groups, making statistical rigor and sampling difficult.
-
•
Trust and interpretability in ML models can be more important than peak accuracy for business adoption.
-
•
Collaborative shared spaces or cross-functional teams focused on common goals bridge gaps between design, engineering, and data science.
-
•
Designers help translate data science outputs into actionable, contextual decision support for end users.
-
•
Prototyping ML products requires believable, realistic data and testing boundaries like false positives early to build trust.
-
•
Decision culture (focusing on which decisions to support) is a more useful framing than data culture in enterprise AI/ML products.
-
•
The ecosystem around ML includes not only users and business stakeholders but also data labelers who impact outcomes.
-
•
The integration of business rules with ML models enhances contextual relevance and facilitates user trust.
-
•
No-code and rapid data science tools are emerging to help speed experimentation but do not fully replace model development demands.
Notable Quotes
"When you work with machine learning engineers doing advanced techniques, you’re really out of the realm of your knowledge."
"Most data science and analytics teams do not have designers or user experience people unless they are software native companies."
"If nobody uses this because they don’t trust it, it doesn’t matter. You just rehearsed without a concert."
"We need to think more about decision culture instead of data culture — what decisions are we trying to make?"
"Sometimes, the answer is ignore machine learning here. It is not the right tool for everything."
"Designers partnering with data scientists leads to smarter, more adaptable interfaces that actually get used."
"We’re talking to really small groups — sometimes 8 to 10 ML engineers on a particular domain — so sampling and rigor are tough."
"Creating that shared space where design, engineering, and data science work together is key to success."
"The human algorithms that people use today should be understood and incorporated into ML models where possible."
"You have to test the boundaries of false positives, false negatives, and surprising positives to see if people trust your model."
Dig deeper—ask the Rosenbot:
















More Videos

"Users typically rate a product better than non-users because of familiarity and built-up trust."
Daniela Magaña Flores Ariane Rahn Jeff Ephraim BanderAhead of Competition: Learn What UX Benchmarking Can Do for Your Business Today
March 10, 2022

"When humans blindly prompt a large language model, they’re not receiving wisdom from an all-knowing oracle but probabilistic outcomes based on patterns."
Savina HawkinsHarnessing AI in UXR: Practical Strategies for Positive Impact
March 26, 2024

"Each species lost is a thread untethered from the web of life that supports us all."
Alex Hurworth Bonnie John Fahd Arshad Antoine MarinDesigning a Contact Tracing App for Universal Access
October 23, 2020

"Researchers often struggle to understand why past design decisions were made because knowledge is siloed or buried."
Matt DuignanHITS, Microsoft's internal human insight system: From research library to living body of knowledge (Videoconference)
July 16, 2019

"Designers need to speak truth to power and engage their creative abilities to materially change how and what is produced - Diego Rodriguez."
Craig VillamorDesign Systems for Ethical Design (Videoconference)
January 26, 2023

"Think of UX as risk mitigation, not a zero-sum game, and share the risk with your stakeholders."
Ovetta SampsonTurning UX Passion into Real Product Influence
June 7, 2023

"If you’re learning something at the end of Sprint six, it’s really costly to go back and make changes in Sprint one or two."
Rima Campbell Amrit S BhachuIncrease Productivity and Drive Business Impact
September 24, 2024

"Set up clear boundaries early on with your head of design on what lives in your world and what lives in theirs."
Amy Gawronski ZuccaroAdvice for DesignOps Employee #1
September 29, 2021

"Will you learn to let go? Better yet, will you let go?"
Victor UdoewaBeyond Methods and Diversity: The Roots of Inclusion
March 26, 2024