Summary
In this panel, Lisa Welchman, Kenneth Bowles, and Dan Rosenberg engage in a deep conversation about the evolving role of designers and UX professionals as AI increasingly impacts their work and the broader society. Kenneth stresses the dual meaning of responsibility, emphasizing that designers must consider users, society, and their profession, not just immediate clients. Dan highlights the risk of blind faith in AI tools, cautioning about ‘garbage in, garbage out’ and the importance of human judgment in design decisions. Lisa points out the commoditization of design work driven partially by the profession itself, warning of potential disintermediation and urging designers to reclaim their agency by understanding business and technology deeply. They all agree on the imperative for designers to engage with emerging technologies proactively rather than resist. Collaboration across disciplines, especially with data science, and addressing structural organizational silos are critical to responsibly guide AI’s integration. The panel also touches on designing for unpredictable AI error states, ethical mitigation strategies, and the importance of preserving human judgment and values in the face of increasing automation. The talk concludes with a call to action for designers to become technologically literate, ethically engaged, and to actively shape the trajectory of AI to benefit society.
Key Insights
-
•
Designers have a professional obligation to consider not only users but also society and their own profession when creating AI-driven products.
-
•
Human judgment remains essential in AI-assisted design, as current AI cannot reliably make complex ethical or strategic decisions.
-
•
There is a real threat of designers losing influence as companies might opt to replace human judgment with cheaper, AI-driven decision-making.
-
•
Commoditization of UX work through automation and componentization has weakened designers’ power in the industry.
-
•
Effective design leadership requires a deep understanding of business, technology, and the broader organizational ecosystem.
-
•
Collaboration between designers, data scientists, and other disciplines is crucial to address AI biases and ensure high-quality data inputs.
-
•
Designing for AI requires anticipating infinite error states and building capacity for ethical mitigation, which demands organizational space and time.
-
•
Middle management silos present a significant barrier to cross-disciplinary collaboration necessary for responsible AI integration.
-
•
The best designers move upstream, becoming product strategists rather than focusing solely on surface interaction design.
-
•
Technological literacy for designers is critical to maintaining relevance and effectively shaping future workflows with AI and beyond.
Notable Quotes
"Designers have obligations not just to users or employers but also to society and to their own profession."
"I fear some company leaders will soon cut designers out of decision loops, believing AI can do it better."
"Garbage in, garbage out risk is very real when using AI for user research synthesis."
"There’s more to being human, even in business, than quickly answering questions or summing up data."
"If you don’t understand the business, you don’t deserve a seat in the C-suite."
"We’ve done a lot of self-commoditization by componentizing our work and making it easier to automate."
"It’s not about dropping human judgment, but about augmenting it responsibly with AI."
"Error states are essentially infinite in generative AI, so we need to design and test proactively for them."
"Middle management often preserves the status quo, making collaboration difficult in large enterprises."
"Now is the time to engage, understand, and influence AI’s trajectory before it’s too late."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We want teams to have autonomy and power to make pivot, shelve, and proceed decisions, not leadership dictating."
Standardizing Product Merits for Leaders, Designers, and Everyone
June 15, 2018
"Space has meaning in a map—if you move components around without reason, it’s no longer a map."
Simon WardleyMaps and Topographical Intelligence (Videoconference)
January 31, 2019
"The Twitter algorithm favored lighter skin tones when cropping images, reflecting racial bias in tech."
Sandra CamachoCreating More Bias-Proof Designs
January 22, 2025
"It takes at least one team member to choose to set healthy standards for collaboration."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"We mitigated data privacy risks by subscribing to the corporate plan for ChatGPT, which offers enhanced security."
Fisayo Osilaja[Demo] The AI edge: From researcher to strategist
June 4, 2024
"Creating tangible artifacts forces reaction and debate, helping break enterprise paralysis and drive decisions."
Uday GajendarThe Wicked Craft of Enterprise UX
May 13, 2015
"Service blueprints would have helped business units understand backend impacts and responsibilities."
Davis Neable Guy SegalHow to Drive a Design Project When you Don’t Have a Design Team
June 10, 2021
"We stopped talking about patterns and consistency and started talking about scalability and speed to connect with stakeholders."
Eniola OluwoleLessons From the DesignOps Journey of the World's Largest Travel Site
October 24, 2019
"The operational glue that binds strategy, execution, and measurement in design is often missing, and that’s critical for scaling."
Aurobinda Pradhan Shashank DeshpandeIntroduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts
September 9, 2022
