Rosenverse
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes

Gold
Wednesday, March 9, 2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Share the love for this talk
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes
Speakers: Victor Udoewa
Link:

Summary

Have you ever been a part of a participatory research process or the use of a participatory method only to find that it fell short of any real shift of power dynamics? Have you ever compared notes with another participatory design researcher only to find out their definition of participatory research and design is different than your own? Have you faced opposition from your organization in practicing research in a more participatory way? What does research even mean, what is its purpose, and how does research change from community to community, context to context? Based on that, what are the future possibilities of research?

Come, join the conversation, and see what Victor Udoewa has to say about such experiences, the different definitions of participatory research and how participatory research can actually be used to reinforce hierarchies. One way he has found to dismantle that system is to practice radical participatory research. He will share what that means, how it looks, and how you can begin moving in that direction along with a direct challenge to our community of researchers in regards to our own power.

Key Insights

  • •

    Participatory research is an ancient practice predating modern academia, evidenced in traditions like seed braiding in West Africa and shaman apprenticeships worldwide.

  • •

    Conventional participatory research often reinforces power hierarchies by centering professional researchers as facilitators and decision-makers.

  • •

    Radical participatory research requires community members to outnumber researchers, lead all aspects of research, and own the outcomes and narratives.

  • •

    Giving up power, rather than empowering others, is crucial to avoid perpetuating existing hierarchies in research.

  • •

    Embodied experiential knowledge from community members is often more valuable than institutional knowledge and should be prioritized.

  • •

    Radical participatory research embeds trauma-responsive practices more effectively by involving community members with lived experience.

  • •

    Ethical remuneration must consider equity, compensating community members fairly based on their sacrifices, not just equally.

  • •

    Radical participatory research blurs the lines between research and design, emphasizing non-linear co-creation driven by community needs.

  • •

    Systems and futures thinking are more accessible when communities lead, shifting focus from deficit-based to asset-based, desire-driven approaches.

  • •

    Sustainable shifts in power among team members indicate the success of radical participatory research beyond just project outcomes.

Notable Quotes

"When we empower others, we are actually reinforcing the hierarchy we seek to subvert."

"Community members are always participating and always leading, and they may invite professional researchers up to equal participation and equitable co-leadership."

"Cultural and experiential knowledge are greater than institutional knowledge."

"Empathy is an impossibility when there is inherent power imbalance between researcher and participant."

"If the community is truly leading, you shouldn’t have anyone on the research team who doesn’t want to be there."

"The pace of radical participatory research must match the pace of availability, trust, and relationship."

"The community owns the artifacts and outcomes, as well as the narratives around those outcomes."

"There are many ways to compensate people, but it is not your choice—it is theirs."

"Have a majority of the research team members experienced a sustained and sustainable shift in power?"

"When you do radical participatory research, the process becomes an educational one—for researchers and community members alike."

Ask the Rosenbot
Ted Neward
Theme 4: Enterprise Organizational Journey
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Rachel Posman
A Closer Look at Team Ops and Product Ops (Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin)
2020 • DesignOps Community
Jon Fukuda
Theme One Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Joanna Vodopivec
One Research Team for All - Influence Without Authority
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Ross Smith
Breaking Barriers with Empathy
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Gina Mendolia
Coordinated collaboration: a Service Design & DesignOps love story
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
Jay Bustamante
Navigating the Ethical Frontier: DesignOps Strategies for Responsible AI Innovation
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Andrew Webster
Scaling Design Capability: How Involved Should You Be?
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Shahrzad Samadzadeh
What Is My Value? Two Takes and Some Mistakes
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
John Cutler
Prioritization for designers and product managers (1st of 3 seminars)
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Kit Unger
Theme 1 Intro
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Jon Temple
Panel: Stacks, Security, and Stakeholders: The Hidden Work of UXR Tool Procurement
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Peter Merholz
The 2025 State of UX/Design Organizational Health
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Laura Weiss
There is No Playbook: Leader as Coach During Challenging Times
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Samuel Proulx
Inclusive Research: Debunking Myths and Getting Started
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Malini Rao
Lessons Learned from a 4-year Product Re-platforming Journey
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold

More Videos

Shipra Kayan

"We moved from Evernote to spreadsheets, to a giant affinity board in Mirror, then to UserVoice, and finally to idiomatic software with AI."

Shipra Kayan

How we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up

September 30, 2021

Peter Morville

"Information architects use nodes and links to create environments for understanding."

Peter Morville

The Architecture of Understanding

May 13, 2015

Renee Reid

"If you make a pretty page, that’s great. But if the users can’t actually use the page or they’re frustrated, you just have a pretty page."

Renee Reid

Becoming a ResearchH.E.R (Highly Enterprise Ready)

June 3, 2019

Dane DeSutter

"The computer metaphor of mind does not do a very good job of explaining what we see people do with their bodies."

Dane DeSutter

Keeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not

March 26, 2024

Sam Proulx

"If you build accessible shopping with these four keys, compliance with legal standards like WCAG will naturally fall into place."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

October 3, 2023

Andrew Custage

"A poor experience on a web visit isn’t out of sight, out of mind; it impacts their entire history with the brand."

Andrew Custage Michael Mallett

The Digital Journey: Research on Consumer Frustration and Loyalty

March 29, 2023

Shelby Switzer

"The primary goal of a hackathon is the community building aspect and getting people to talk to each other and learn from each other."

Shelby Switzer

Making Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World

December 10, 2021

Llewyn Paine

"Generative AI is non-deterministic and doesn’t understand meaning, so baseline error rates exist in all tools we use."

Llewyn Paine

Coexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration

March 11, 2025

Robin Beers

"The machine lens gave us hierarchy, bureaucracy, and a focus on efficiency and control, but it sidelines holistic thinking."

Robin Beers

Navigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change

March 13, 2025