Rosenverse
A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust

Friday, April 28, 2023 • QuantQual Interest Group
Share the love for this talk
A Mixed Method Approach to Validity to Help Build Trust
Speakers: Chris Engledowl
Link:

Summary

Quantitative instruments are frequently sought because 1) they can be quickly fielded to lots and lots of people, and 2) when carefully sampled, they can be generalizable to the population of users/customers. However, because many times the focus is on speed to launch because decision-makers need results quickly, there is not much depth given to their development, nor an investigation of the validity evidence. In the session, I will share a framework that centers validity and is necessarily a mixed methods approach to research. I will also share ideas on how to scale the research over time so that findings and insights are able to be iteratively delivered to stakeholders, while also iteratively informing one another in a qual-quant research dance that brings more trustworthy, user-centered evidence to decision-makers. Finally, I will share ideas for a course I am developing for supporting qualitative researchers to become more mixed in their approach.

Key Insights

  • •

    Validity involves five evidence sources: content, response processes, internal structure, relations to other variables, and consequences of testing.

  • •

    Qualitative methods, especially cognitive interviews, are crucial for understanding how respondents interpret survey items, supporting validity.

  • •

    Surveys should be treated as products that need ongoing iteration and testing, not one-off tools.

  • •

    Ethical considerations extend beyond data privacy to how survey results affect user experience and product decisions.

  • •

    Mixed methods approaches leverage both qualitative insights and quantitative analyses to build a stronger validity argument.

  • •

    Breaking down survey validation work across multiple teams and 'bite-sized' efforts makes the process manageable.

  • •

    Revising surveys over time to improve validity complicates measuring change longitudinally but increases trustworthiness.

  • •

    Stakeholder buy-in improves when validity processes are communicated as phased insights offering tangible results quickly.

  • •

    Analyses such as factor analysis and Rasch modeling reveal survey internal structure and help identify item bias across subpopulations.

  • •

    It is important to revisit validity considerations continuously, especially after product or user base changes.

Notable Quotes

"Validity is the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores for proposed uses."

"Qualitative research in a mixed methods setting needs to think about validity to support the bigger validity argument."

"What would happen if you do think about validity? Would it change your process or research plans?"

"Surveys are products too, so they need to be iteratively tested."

"You don’t know what you don’t know. Let’s write surveys that cover those blind spots."

"If the survey wording changes, measuring change over time becomes difficult, but improving the survey builds trust."

"Ethical considerations should go beyond typical privacy reviews and think deeply about user impact throughout the process."

"It is better to partner with someone who has quantitative expertise to interpret internal structure analyses."

"Management and stakeholders often care more about getting usable information quickly than understanding the full validity process."

"We can get quick insights in phases to keep teams engaged and slowly build a complete validity argument."

Ask the Rosenbot
Bill Scott
Lean Engineering: Engineering for Learning and Experimentation in the Enterprise
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Jake Burghardt
Finding More Inroads into Research Impact
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Kritika Yadav
Optimizing AI Conversations: A Case Study on Personalized Shopping Assistance Frameworks
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
GenAI for UXers: A Rosenbot Demo and Discussion
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Lija Hogan
Three Years Out: Perspectives on the Near-Term Future of User Research
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Mujtaba Hameed
Frameworks for Excellence: Using Visual Thinking and Communication to Elevate Your Research
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Indi Young
Thinking styles: Mend hidden cracks in your market
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Ryan Matthew
DesignOps without Boundaries: Building More with What You Have
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
JJ Kercher
A Roadmap for Maturing Design in the Enterprise
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Nathan Curtis
Design Systems for Us: How Many One-Source(s)-of-Truth Are Enough?
2019 • DesignOps Community
Paul Pangaro, PhD
Systems Disciplines: Table Stakes for 21st Century Organizations
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Jose Coronado
People First - Design at JP Morgan
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Marissa Cui
Climate Design Product Showcase
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Dave Hora
A Research Skills Evolution
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Maria Giudice
Empowering change: Reigniting purpose, passion and impact in research
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Lisa Welchman
Cleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold

More Videos

Erin Hauber

"Maybe the ambiguity and frequent changes in SAFe could actually be an opportunity, not just a headache."

Erin Hauber

Design is Not the Frosting on the Scaled Agile Layer Cake

October 24, 2019

Megan Kierstead

"The more senior you become, the more focus shifts from methodology to interpersonal qualities like empathy and bravery."

Megan Kierstead

You Are a Badass at UX: Overcoming Imposter Syndrome

March 10, 2021

Maggie Dieringer

"When the world outside is crazy, the team needs to know that at least design ops has things under control internally."

Maggie Dieringer

Creating Consistency Through Constant Change

January 8, 2024

Meaghan Waters

"Allocate about 30% of your analysis and design effort to change management for successful adoption."

Meaghan Waters Fotina Koutropoulous

Lack of Product Thinking will Doom Your Legacy Modernization

June 9, 2021

Jemma Ahmed

"Market research can no longer afford to take six months with multiple waves; it has to be speedier and more agile now."

Jemma Ahmed

Bringing together market and user research

October 17, 2019

Maria Taylor

"Start small by delivering the minimum amount of useful information, like a UX glossary or a single community of practice."

Maria Taylor

Knowledge is Power: Managing the Lifeblood of the Design Org

October 3, 2023

Sam Proulx

"The little sounds that VoiceOver makes are like bird song; you only notice them when they're gone."

Sam Proulx

Understanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users

June 6, 2023

Catherine Blizzard

"We threw out the team structure and started to commission work based on the multiple skills needed for each project."

Catherine Blizzard

Using Integrated Insight to Drive Growth

March 10, 2022

Randolph Duke II

"I put down my question guide and just talked with Carol."

Randolph Duke II

War Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II

March 30, 2020