Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
Quantitative instruments are frequently sought because 1) they can be quickly fielded to lots and lots of people, and 2) when carefully sampled, they can be generalizable to the population of users/customers. However, because many times the focus is on speed to launch because decision-makers need results quickly, there is not much depth given to their development, nor an investigation of the validity evidence. In the session, I will share a framework that centers validity and is necessarily a mixed methods approach to research. I will also share ideas on how to scale the research over time so that findings and insights are able to be iteratively delivered to stakeholders, while also iteratively informing one another in a qual-quant research dance that brings more trustworthy, user-centered evidence to decision-makers. Finally, I will share ideas for a course I am developing for supporting qualitative researchers to become more mixed in their approach.
Key Insights
-
•
Validity in surveys is multi-faceted, relying on five evidence sources: test content, response processes, internal structure, relation to other variables, and consequences of testing.
-
•
Mixed methods combining qualitative cognitive interviews and quantitative analysis enhance survey validity and build stakeholder trust.
-
•
Breaking down survey validation efforts across multiple teams makes the process more manageable and effective.
-
•
Iterative survey development over multiple rounds helps improve instrument quality while balancing the need for timely insights.
-
•
Qualitative research plays a vital role even within quantitative validity frameworks by revealing respondent interpretation and cognitive processes.
-
•
Careful stakeholder engagement and communicating rapid but incremental insights increases buy-in for rigorous validity processes.
-
•
Survey validity is closely tied to ethical considerations, including the impact on respondents and responsible data use.
-
•
Significant product or user base changes necessitate revisiting and revising surveys to maintain validity.
-
•
Statistical methods like factor analysis and Rasch modeling help detect underlying constructs and response biases across subpopulations.
-
•
It is often necessary to accept imperfect early versions of surveys, improving them progressively while acknowledging limits to change-over-time comparisons.
Notable Quotes
"Validity is the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores for proposed uses."
"Qualitative research is vital for establishing validity in mixed methods because it helps us understand how respondents interpret questions."
"Surveys are products too—they need to be iteratively tested and refined."
"You don’t know what you don’t know—surveys have blind spots that qualitative techniques can help reveal."
"If you have broader research goals shared across quant and qual teams, then the overlap supports answering difficult validity questions."
"Conversations with stakeholders need to focus on delivering usable information quickly, not just on the validity process itself."
"Consequences of testing include ethical considerations about how survey responses affect user experience and product decisions."
"It’s better to partner with quantitative experts if you don’t have that expertise yourself to understand internal structure analyses."
"If the survey doesn’t work well for subpopulations, focus initially on groups where it’s reliable while you investigate others."
"Improving surveys iteratively can undermine longitudinal measures, so it’s critical to balance validity and tracking over time."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"When teams lose a sense of agency, they act strange, cutting corners and racing to get something out the door."
Standardizing Product Merits for Leaders, Designers, and Everyone
June 15, 2018
"You can mine metadata from your platform to spot emerging patterns and commoditize new components."
Simon WardleyMaps and Topographical Intelligence (Videoconference)
January 31, 2019
"Many smartwatch designs assume male hands as default, excluding smaller wrists and diverse body types."
Sandra CamachoCreating More Bias-Proof Designs
January 22, 2025
"By observing, appealing to interests, and promoting accountability, we can build empathy and respect to combat toxicity."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"Using ChatGPT allowed me to elevate from a researcher to a strategist by increasing my visibility and trust in the company."
Fisayo Osilaja[Demo] The AI edge: From researcher to strategist
June 4, 2024
"Temporary, quick, and sometimes rough artifacts have a lifespan just long enough for the conversation they enable."
Uday GajendarThe Wicked Craft of Enterprise UX
May 13, 2015
"No official kickoff was held, which meant shifting expectations and lack of alignment."
Davis Neable Guy SegalHow to Drive a Design Project When you Don’t Have a Design Team
June 10, 2021
"Once cash prizes were gone, people stopped feeling ownership of the design system."
Eniola OluwoleLessons From the DesignOps Journey of the World's Largest Travel Site
October 24, 2019
"Design producers love their creative tools and want to keep using them without multiple manual reporting steps."
Aurobinda Pradhan Shashank DeshpandeIntroduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts
September 9, 2022
