Rosenverse
Atomizing Research: Trend or Trap

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Atomizing Research: Trend or Trap

Gold
Monday, March 30, 2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Share the love for this talk
Atomizing Research: Trend or Trap
Speakers: Matt Duignan
Link:

Summary

There has been an explosion of interest in atomizing research, where researchers stop writing reports and instead tag individual insights in a database. The theory is that this will unlock your insights, making them findable and reusable. But does it work, and should you be doing the same? At Microsoft we tried it: Five years, 40,000 insights, 20+ research teams, and 17,000 unique users. So what have we learnt? We learnt that a structured insight library can be worth the effort. But we also learnt that atomizing insight can be taken too far. We learnt that context is critical. We learnt that short term efficiency is king, and that the required culture change is hard. And through this journey we’ve begun to discover how to blend atomized insight with your traditional research process.

Key Insights

  • •

    Traditional research repositories often become burial grounds for insights, making it hard to find or connect reusable knowledge.

  • •

    Shifting to atomic research focuses on individual insights as the fundamental unit rather than entire reports, enabling search, link, and remix.

  • •

    Microsoft’s HITS system tracks dozens of thousands of insights connected across products like Windows, Xbox, and HoloLens.

  • •

    Creating durable, reusable research insights requires overcoming strong human cognitive biases like hyperbolic discounting and in-group favoritism.

  • •

    A culture of continuous curation and managerial priority is essential but challenging to maintain over time.

  • •

    Immediate tactical value is key to motivating researchers to contribute to reusable knowledge rather than only producing one-off reports.

  • •

    Allowing insights to emerge organically by observing reference patterns reduces complexity compared to rigid categorization of durable vs. raw observations.

  • •

    Researchers and product teams benefit greatly from direct linking to specific insights and underlying evidence within their day-to-day workflows.

  • •

    Handling conflicting insights involves encouraging researchers to collaborate and rationalize perspectives through syntheses rather than top-down arbitration.

  • •

    The just-in-time curation approach folds creation and connection of reusable insights into immediate research tasks, reducing friction and cognitive load.

Notable Quotes

"Repository to me has a connotation of a place where stuff goes to sit and collect dust."

"What if the atomic unit of research wasn’t the reports, but it was the insight within those reports?"

"We wanted a living network of knowledge so yesterday’s insight connects to today’s evidence and tomorrow’s learning."

"Curation is super important, but also super hard."

"You have to push against 200,000 years of human evolution to get researchers to create reusable knowledge."

"Product teams want quick, grab-and-go research results, but reusable insights are more abstract and take longer to digest."

"Providing immediate tactical value is the big one for just-in-time curation."

"Standalone insights destroy the researcher’s ability to storytelling and engagement."

"Durable insights can emerge organically based on usage and referencing patterns in the system."

"The challenge is whether your organization has the energy to overcome cultural and technical barriers driving researchers back to disposable knowledge."

Ask the Rosenbot
Patrizia Bertini
The (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Kurt McCulloch
Faster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Jeff Sussna
What DesignOps Can Learn From DevOps
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Kate Koch
Flex Your Super Powers: When a Design Ops Team Scales to Power CX
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Taylor Jennings
Repository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Alicia Mooty
Design Staffing Models
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Jemma Ahmed
Collaboration: learning from other fields beyond our own [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Karen Pascoe
Developing Experience Teams and Talent in the Enterprise
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Phil Hesketh
Designing Accessible Research Workflows
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Leading through the long tail of trauma
2022 • Advancing Research Community
John Donmoyer
Shipping your code generation experiments to production
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Jon White
Unsticking Research for Better Information Flow
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Johanna Kollmann
Insights-Driven Product Strategy: Get your Research to Count
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Peter Van Dijck
Designing AI-first products on top of a rapidly evolving technology
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Sean McKay
Coexisting with non-researchers: Practical strategies for a democratized research future
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold

More Videos

Erin Hauber

"Defining teams by shared value — what’s desirable, compliant, feasible, and viable — broke down silos effectively."

Erin Hauber

Design is Not the Frosting on the Scaled Agile Layer Cake

October 24, 2019

Megan Kierstead

"The more senior you become, the more focus shifts from methodology to interpersonal qualities like empathy and bravery."

Megan Kierstead

You Are a Badass at UX: Overcoming Imposter Syndrome

March 10, 2021

Maggie Dieringer

"When the world outside is crazy, the team needs to know that at least design ops has things under control internally."

Maggie Dieringer

Creating Consistency Through Constant Change

January 8, 2024

Meaghan Waters

"We’ve seen organizations try to run 52 projects with only 36 teams—distraction at its worst."

Meaghan Waters Fotina Koutropoulous

Lack of Product Thinking will Doom Your Legacy Modernization

June 9, 2021

Jemma Ahmed

"User researchers still feel like they’re in a precarious position and want to be part of the pack but they’re just not there yet."

Jemma Ahmed

Bringing together market and user research

October 17, 2019

Maria Taylor

"Building trust should absolutely be a core value for design ops teams aiming to steward knowledge effectively."

Maria Taylor

Knowledge is Power: Managing the Lifeblood of the Design Org

October 3, 2023

Sam Proulx

"Simulation or personas can never replace testing with real users to build empathy and get accurate results."

Sam Proulx

Understanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users

June 6, 2023

Catherine Blizzard

"I wanted to create a model that let us rapidly increase our value within the business."

Catherine Blizzard

Using Integrated Insight to Drive Growth

March 10, 2022

Randolph Duke II

"Laura let out a sigh of relief and said, I don’t think I could ever recover the way that you did."

Randolph Duke II

War Stories LIVE! Randy Duke II

March 30, 2020