Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Fast and Fearless Inclusive Research

Gold
Monday, March 27, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
Fast and Fearless Inclusive Research
Speakers: Kaitlin Tasker
Link:

Summary

We will be presenting a simple framework or “toolkit” that can be used to align on the “minimum viable participants” for inclusive research when under pressure. Intentional user research often gets classified into two categories. One aims to recruit users based on specific, constraint, or viability-driven criteria, e.g., who is most likely to be an early adopter, most likely to engage, or most likely to find value. This type of research is often seen as “fast,” “focused,” and “targeted,” but may overlook meaningful nuance. The other focuses on diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), examining historical frameworks, and patterns of exclusion or injustice, and is viewed as “ethical,” “inclusive,” and “deep” but can also be cumbersome for teams under time or resource pressure. However, fast and inclusive research are not mutually exclusive. Contrary to the popular belief that building DEI principles into user research slows us down or is just a “nice to have,” we propose instead, that it can accelerate insights by efficiently identifying the highest risk use cases and revealing beneficial design for all.

Key Insights

  • Inclusive research is not inherently fast and must be approached with ethical caution and reflection on bias.

  • Default assumptions in design often invisibly disadvantage marginalized groups, such as women or people of color.

  • Highly educated professionals still revert to defaults under pressure, highlighting the persistence of bias.

  • A frame is a cognitive structure that shapes what we see and how we interpret research, and underdeveloped frames lead to bias.

  • Structured self-reflection on positionality, marginalization, and intersectionality is crucial before conducting research.

  • Iterative framing and team reflection help identify which marginalized perspectives are missing and how to include them.

  • Including diverse stakeholders early, especially at problem framing, improves research relevance and ethical representation.

  • Designing for marginalized intersections often yields insights that improve experiences for the entire population.

  • Industry pressure for speed and minimal resources often conflicts with intentional, inclusive research practices.

  • Creating deliberate space for reflection, listening, and shifting power within teams fosters more inclusive outcomes.

Notable Quotes

"The title of the talk is a misnomer: this work isn't actually that fast and shouldn't be done without fear of consequences."

"The town of Carlsgo wasn't consciously disadvantaging women, they were just following a best practice that ignored different experiences."

"Women are 70% more likely to walk or use public transit, combining trips that are much harder with snow than driving a car."

"We design from our own lens and intentions but repeatedly create harmful consequences for marginalized groups."

"Highly trained professionals still default to a presumed 'standard' under pressure, revealing how bias persists."

"A frame is extremely hard to dislodge from our brains once triggered, so we have to build inclusive frames deliberately."

"You want to set a learning tone for your team and give space for emotional reactions and reflection."

"We need to reckon with how the lenses of the research team differ from those of the participants to avoid colonialist extraction."

"Findings from marginalized groups aren’t just relevant to them but often improve the experience for many more people."

"Frames are not static; they are tools for continuous discovery, reflection, and change."

Ask the Rosenbot
Joshua Graves
We Need To Talk: Addressing Unmet Expectations (Part 2 of 3)
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Satyam Kantamneni
Do You Have an Experience Vision?
2023 • Enterprise Community
Jon Temple
Panel: Stacks, Security, and Stakeholders: The Hidden Work of UXR Tool Procurement
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Matt Duignan
HITS, Microsoft's internal human insight system: From research library to living body of knowledge
2019 • Advancing Research Community
Lona Moore
Scaling Design Beyond Designers
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Daniel Korczynski
Why AI Is Bad at Research (and how to make it actually useful)
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Jay Bustamante
Navigating the Ethical Frontier: DesignOps Strategies for Responsible AI Innovation
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Maria Skaaden
Panel Discussion: Methodologies and Work Environments
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Dave Hoffer
UX Job Search AMA #2 with Joanne Weaver and Dave Hoffer
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Tristin Oldani
Turning awareness into action with Climate UX
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Bria Alexander
Opening Remarks
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Deanna Washington
Scaling Success: Paving the Path from DesignOps to VP
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Dave Malouf
The Past, Present, and Future of DesignOps: a 2-part DesignOps Community Call (Part 2)
2022 • DesignOps Community
Jackie Ho
Lead Effectively While Preserving Team Autonomy with Growth Boards
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Sheryl Cababa
Thinking in systems to address climate with Sheryl Cababa
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Jill Fruchter
Inconvenient Insights: The Researcher's Role is to Stay Curious
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold

More Videos

Taylor Jennings

"Drag and drop ease, and collaborative affinity diagramming in the tool, were unexpected but very welcome advantages."

Taylor Jennings Joe Nelson Alex Knoll

Repository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research

March 9, 2022

Nicole Aleong

"Speculation fills in the gaps where past experience fails us, often seen in hesitation or pauses."

Nicole Aleong

Future Orientations to Everyday Life: Futures Anthropology as a Methodology

March 26, 2024

Jeff Gothelf

"The team that comes up with the winning idea leaves the studio with equity and carries the idea forward."

Jeff Gothelf

Innovation Studios: the Engines of Enterprise Experimentation

May 14, 2015

Saara Kamppari-Miller

"If you don't have dedicated accessibility people, start grassroots by building empathy and rallying teams around user stories."

Saara Kamppari-Miller

DesignOps for Inclusive Design and Accessibility

May 26, 2022

Tess Dixon

"You can’t make your team happy, no one can ever make anyone else happy ever, ever."

Tess Dixon

C'mon Get Happy

September 29, 2021

Liam Thurston

"Being intentional about how we spend our time is the purest manifestation of our values and our value."

Liam Thurston

Why Your Design Team Is Quitting, And How To Fix It

June 10, 2022

Ian Swinson

"Why don’t we do what we do for users but apply it to our own careers? Absolutely nutty, right? So we did."

Ian Swinson

Designing and Driving UX Careers

June 8, 2016

Leisa Reichelt

"One researcher per team for at least three days a week was considered an outrageous luxury at GDS in 2013."

Leisa Reichelt

Opening Keynote: Operating in Context

November 7, 2018

Rachael Greene

"Without a design ops function, teams make their own flavors that dilute brand and accessibility."

Rachael Greene Alison Davis

Building a Design Ops Practice that Really Works (Most of the Time)

October 2, 2025