Fast and Fearless Inclusive Research
Summary
We will be presenting a simple framework or “toolkit” that can be used to align on the “minimum viable participants” for inclusive research when under pressure. Intentional user research often gets classified into two categories. One aims to recruit users based on specific, constraint, or viability-driven criteria, e.g., who is most likely to be an early adopter, most likely to engage, or most likely to find value. This type of research is often seen as “fast,” “focused,” and “targeted,” but may overlook meaningful nuance. The other focuses on diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), examining historical frameworks, and patterns of exclusion or injustice, and is viewed as “ethical,” “inclusive,” and “deep” but can also be cumbersome for teams under time or resource pressure. However, fast and inclusive research are not mutually exclusive. Contrary to the popular belief that building DEI principles into user research slows us down or is just a “nice to have,” we propose instead, that it can accelerate insights by efficiently identifying the highest risk use cases and revealing beneficial design for all.
Key Insights
-
•
Inclusive research is not inherently fast and must be approached with ethical caution and reflection on bias.
-
•
Default assumptions in design often invisibly disadvantage marginalized groups, such as women or people of color.
-
•
Highly educated professionals still revert to defaults under pressure, highlighting the persistence of bias.
-
•
A frame is a cognitive structure that shapes what we see and how we interpret research, and underdeveloped frames lead to bias.
-
•
Structured self-reflection on positionality, marginalization, and intersectionality is crucial before conducting research.
-
•
Iterative framing and team reflection help identify which marginalized perspectives are missing and how to include them.
-
•
Including diverse stakeholders early, especially at problem framing, improves research relevance and ethical representation.
-
•
Designing for marginalized intersections often yields insights that improve experiences for the entire population.
-
•
Industry pressure for speed and minimal resources often conflicts with intentional, inclusive research practices.
-
•
Creating deliberate space for reflection, listening, and shifting power within teams fosters more inclusive outcomes.
Notable Quotes
"The title of the talk is a misnomer: this work isn't actually that fast and shouldn't be done without fear of consequences."
"The town of Carlsgo wasn't consciously disadvantaging women, they were just following a best practice that ignored different experiences."
"Women are 70% more likely to walk or use public transit, combining trips that are much harder with snow than driving a car."
"We design from our own lens and intentions but repeatedly create harmful consequences for marginalized groups."
"Highly trained professionals still default to a presumed 'standard' under pressure, revealing how bias persists."
"A frame is extremely hard to dislodge from our brains once triggered, so we have to build inclusive frames deliberately."
"You want to set a learning tone for your team and give space for emotional reactions and reflection."
"We need to reckon with how the lenses of the research team differ from those of the participants to avoid colonialist extraction."
"Findings from marginalized groups aren’t just relevant to them but often improve the experience for many more people."
"Frames are not static; they are tools for continuous discovery, reflection, and change."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The difference between the way people talk about how things are done and how they are actually done reveals unconscious assumptions."
Carl TurnerYou Can Do This: Understand and Solve Organizational Problems to Jumpstart a Dead Project
March 28, 2023
"If there’s a performance gap, don’t sit on it; it doesn’t age well and hurts the team, employee, and business."
Karen PascoeDeveloping Experience Teams and Talent in the Enterprise
June 8, 2016
"Continuous onboarding is like drinking water in sips throughout the day, not a gallon all at once."
Jilanna WilsonDistributed Design Operations Management
October 23, 2019
"We treat our shared tooling and design system as a product with a dedicated team maintaining reusable components and governance."
Shawna Hein Kevin HoffmanCreate a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts
November 17, 2022
"Site visits with users don’t just give actionable insight; they give us raw, humbling inspiration to keep going."
Barb SpantonDoing Work That Matters: A Look Beyond The Idealistic Notion of 'Doing Meaningful Work'
June 10, 2022
"Silent leaders are people who prefer action over words and advocate in more intimate settings."
Briana ThomasThe Quiet Force: Uncovering Hidden Leadership in High-Impact Design Teams
September 24, 2024
"Provoking and reframing perspective helps teams get unstuck by thinking in new and surprising ways."
Gina MendoliaTherapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems
December 3, 2024
"The era of 100-page reports is ending because we simply can’t produce them fast enough at scale."
Lija Hogan Milan Mijatovic Sam Proulx Louis RosenfeldThree Years Out: Perspectives on the Near-Term Future of User Research
March 15, 2024
"With our new operating model, partners are more confident funding UX ops because of increased clarity and focus."
John Calhoun Rachel PosmanTwo Sides of the DesignOps Coin: Teams Ops and Product Ops
January 8, 2024
