Fast and Fearless Inclusive Research
Summary
We will be presenting a simple framework or “toolkit” that can be used to align on the “minimum viable participants” for inclusive research when under pressure. Intentional user research often gets classified into two categories. One aims to recruit users based on specific, constraint, or viability-driven criteria, e.g., who is most likely to be an early adopter, most likely to engage, or most likely to find value. This type of research is often seen as “fast,” “focused,” and “targeted,” but may overlook meaningful nuance. The other focuses on diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI), examining historical frameworks, and patterns of exclusion or injustice, and is viewed as “ethical,” “inclusive,” and “deep” but can also be cumbersome for teams under time or resource pressure. However, fast and inclusive research are not mutually exclusive. Contrary to the popular belief that building DEI principles into user research slows us down or is just a “nice to have,” we propose instead, that it can accelerate insights by efficiently identifying the highest risk use cases and revealing beneficial design for all.
Key Insights
-
•
Inclusive research is not inherently fast and must be approached with ethical caution and reflection on bias.
-
•
Default assumptions in design often invisibly disadvantage marginalized groups, such as women or people of color.
-
•
Highly educated professionals still revert to defaults under pressure, highlighting the persistence of bias.
-
•
A frame is a cognitive structure that shapes what we see and how we interpret research, and underdeveloped frames lead to bias.
-
•
Structured self-reflection on positionality, marginalization, and intersectionality is crucial before conducting research.
-
•
Iterative framing and team reflection help identify which marginalized perspectives are missing and how to include them.
-
•
Including diverse stakeholders early, especially at problem framing, improves research relevance and ethical representation.
-
•
Designing for marginalized intersections often yields insights that improve experiences for the entire population.
-
•
Industry pressure for speed and minimal resources often conflicts with intentional, inclusive research practices.
-
•
Creating deliberate space for reflection, listening, and shifting power within teams fosters more inclusive outcomes.
Notable Quotes
"The title of the talk is a misnomer: this work isn't actually that fast and shouldn't be done without fear of consequences."
"The town of Carlsgo wasn't consciously disadvantaging women, they were just following a best practice that ignored different experiences."
"Women are 70% more likely to walk or use public transit, combining trips that are much harder with snow than driving a car."
"We design from our own lens and intentions but repeatedly create harmful consequences for marginalized groups."
"Highly trained professionals still default to a presumed 'standard' under pressure, revealing how bias persists."
"A frame is extremely hard to dislodge from our brains once triggered, so we have to build inclusive frames deliberately."
"You want to set a learning tone for your team and give space for emotional reactions and reflection."
"We need to reckon with how the lenses of the research team differ from those of the participants to avoid colonialist extraction."
"Findings from marginalized groups aren’t just relevant to them but often improve the experience for many more people."
"Frames are not static; they are tools for continuous discovery, reflection, and change."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"The design mindset was way more important than the bureaucratic mindset."
Sofía Delsordo Kassim VeraPublic Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter
December 8, 2021
"Providing context to designers leads to much better design outcomes."
Product and Design at Bloomberg: A 15-year Evolution
December 6, 2022
"I had a hunger for process and efficiency once I built a feedback bot to share customer insights."
Liza Pemstein Jane DavisScaling Research Via an Ops First Model at Clever
March 27, 2023
"It’s important to reflect on our work and careers to shape what comes next."
Kara KaneTheme One Intro
November 16, 2022
"Prioritization work is a political process, and politics are hard to do in technology."
Mark Interrante Harry MaxAI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)
July 11, 2024
"Confidence is critical in online shopping because nobody wants to spend money they’re unsure about losing due to unclear controls."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
October 3, 2023
"UX really doesn’t have a seat at the table yet and that has some implications for us."
Rich MironovHow Can Product Managers and UXers Help Each Other (and Why are Product Folks so Annoying Sometimes)?
December 6, 2022
"Designing healthcare means thinking about how your city, state, and nation work."
Juhan SoninDesign Now! The Agenda for Action
September 4, 2025
"I’m dreaming of a world where women-centricity is so ingrained that frameworks like this don’t need to exist anymore."
Mansi GuptaDrawing from Feminist Practice to Make Inclusive Design Operational
September 9, 2022
