Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

From AI to Zeitgeist: Theory as the design antidote to AI hype

Thursday, March 27, 2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
From AI to Zeitgeist: Theory as the design antidote to AI hype
Speakers: Uday Gajendar and Adam Richardson
Link:

Summary

In an environment of UX staff reductions, a focus on tangible design skills and tool expertise, quarterly profits, and angst over what AI means for the future of everyone’s jobs, what place does “theory” have? As designers and researchers we engage in theory every day by hypothesizing: “If we design it like this, then we will have outcome X.” The bigger the problem you’re trying to solve, the more important it becomes to have a theoretical framework about why you’re doing what you’re doing. The breathless parade of AI releases present the biggest challenges (and potential opportunities) in many years. As designers we should have a posture on how to shape how AI is used and its impacts. Much as the mid-century modernists developed coherent frameworks for understanding the relationship between form, function, and human needs, using novel technologies coming out of World War II, we must now articulate theories that help us make sense of this new landscape where intelligence itself has become a design material. Join UX researcher/strategist Adam Richardson and UX design leader Uday Gajendar for an exploration of how we might develop the theoretical foundations designers need to thoughtfully shape AI interactions.

Key Insights

  • Design theory provides a crucial framework to push back against AI hype and ground action in humanistic values.

  • Historical design movements like Arts and Crafts, Modernism, and Mid-century Modernism reflect responses to societal changes, integrating technology with human-centered ideals.

  • UX design originated from longstanding human-computer interaction research and established theories that are currently underutilized.

  • Affordances, once central to usable design, have been diminished in favor of flat aesthetics and revenue-driven incremental improvements.

  • Victor Papanek’s view of design as a liberal art calls for conscientious, sustainable, and socially responsible design against mass consumerism.

  • Design movements must be collective, hopeful, sustainable, and stand for meaningful ideals rather than oppose something or rely solely on individual passion.

  • Skill boot camps and tactical learning alone do not foster critical design movements or sustained impact.

  • Craft in digital design spans trade (making), stage (facilitating discussions), and statecraft (political relationship-building), all essential for successful design initiatives.

  • Systems thinking is needed to comprehend and communicate the cascading effects and trade-offs of AI and design decisions.

  • The presence of the maker's touch, embodying imperfection and care, is a vital human quality at risk of being lost in AI-generated work.

Notable Quotes

"Theory at its most fundamental just means if something A happens, then something B will happen."

"Designers are theorists whether they realize it or not — they create solutions that have intended and unintended consequences."

"Mass production is here to stay; how do we make it more humanistic?"

"Affordances seem to have fallen to the wayside in favor of flat design and revenue optimization."

"A movement needs to stand for something, be collective, hopeful, sustainable, and tangible."

"Skill boot camps don’t create a movement; they’re tactical and don’t provide a cohesive set of ideas."

"Craft means intent and care even in digital products; for example, the bounce animation of Google Maps’ pin shows someone cared."

"Knowledge is the material we’re working with in AI design, not just pixels or code."

"AI-generated imagery feels too shiny and perfect — unlike the human-made objects that carry flaws and presence of the maker."

"Trying to figure all this out in business settings is nearly impossible; we have to step away and foster ongoing conversations."

Ask the Rosenbot
Jamie Beck Alexander
How can you find your role in climate?
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Lily Aduana
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Abbey Smalley
Today’s Design Ops and Programs Landscape & Career Paths
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Amy Evans
How to Create Change
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Sam Ladner
How Research Can Drive Strategic Foresight
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
John Taschek
Making People the X-Factor in the Enterprise
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Victor Udoewa
Theme One Intro
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Bria Alexander
Welcome
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Greg Petroff
Software as Material—A Redux
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Nathan Curtis
Discussion
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
JJ Kercher
A Roadmap for Maturing Design in the Enterprise
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Dave Gray
Connection, Community, and the Future of Work
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Dan Hill
Designing for the infrastructures of everyday life
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Uday Gajendar
From AI to Zeitgeist: Theory as the design antidote to AI hype
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Robin Beers
How to create actionable insight in the face of politics and silos [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Tony Turner
Capturing Deep Insights
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold

More Videos

John Cutler

"Maturity is not linear; the tanker company had a lot to learn from the speedboat, and vice versa."

John Cutler

Oxbows, Rivers, and Estuaries: How to navigate the currents of change (without burning out)

December 3, 2024

Darian Davis

"If you’re generating buy-in, don’t forget what it will mean for your difficult stakeholders—they may have external pressures you don’t know about."

Darian Davis

Lessons from a Toxic Work Relationship

January 8, 2024

Dave Gray

"Executive air cover is having someone in a senior role who protects and supports the design team from other business pressures."

Dave Gray

Group Activity: Making Sense of DesignOps

November 7, 2017

John Cutler

"The highest leverage thing you can do is design statements that capture the essence in ways that set sail a thousand ships."

John Cutler

The Alignment Trap

November 29, 2023

Abby Covert

"The key to good diagrams is accessibly rendered, content driven, and visually supported."

Abby Covert

Stuck? Diagrams Help

October 27, 2022

Mark Interrante

"We started to build an API for how other teams could interact with us like a contract."

Mark Interrante

Collaboration Flows in Product Development

June 9, 2017

Devon Powers

"Obsession with gadgetry and cool tech ignores the fact that most critical future changes are mundane and essential, like clean water."

Devon Powers

Imagining Better Futures

March 9, 2022

Prayag Narula

"Good designers understand you can’t design what you don’t understand."

Prayag Narula

How to Empower Your Designers to Do Good Research – And Why You Want To

June 10, 2022

Peter Van Dijck

"You can’t just be a designer adapting UX workflows assuming everybody else’s workflow stays the same; everything is changing with AI."

Peter Van Dijck

Hands on AI #3: Claude Code for UX people

October 22, 2025