Rosenverse
Journeying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Journeying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare

Gold
Wednesday, June 5, 2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Share the love for this talk
Journeying toward AI-assisted documentation in healthcare
Speakers: Jennifer Kong
Link:

Summary

Documentation technology is the foundation of modern healthcare delivery. Convoluted, redundant, and excessive documentation is a pervasive problem that causes inefficiency in all aspects of the industry. At IncludedHealth, we are developing an AI-assisted documentation that summarizes and documents conversations between patients and their care providers. A care provider can push one button and have their entire patient encounter captured in a succinct and standardized format. Upon a pilot launch, the results were staggering. Within 6 months, we demonstrated a 64% reduction in time per encounter! However, despite our promising results, there still remain challenges specific to the demands of the healthcare domain. As our team continues to develop solutions to meet these challenges, we gain even more clarity on what it takes to design a human-backed, AI-powered healthcare system. Takeaways From this session, you can expect to learn the following:
  • Developing AI design in healthcare requires close collaboration between end users and your data science team
  • Piloting GenAI solutions may be more effective than traditional prototyping
  • Trading accuracy for efficiency is a barrier to adopting GenAI tools in healthcare
  • GenAI design in healthcare requires establishing critical boundaries as well as a good understanding of cognitive processing
  • Other factors to consider when designing AI solutions for service-based industries are understanding how training might be impacted, the importance of standardization vs. personalization of data output and the need for more autonomy and control elements due to consequences of unpredictable output errors

Key Insights

  • •

    Generative AI can reduce healthcare documentation time by over 60% but doesn't eliminate the need for manual editing and human review.

  • •

    Focusing AI tools initially on low-risk use cases like chat encounter summaries mitigates potential clinical harm.

  • •

    Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at summarizing text but struggle with capturing exact clinical details and non-verbal cues.

  • •

    Designing AI tools requires managing user expectations to prevent disappointment and frustration over imperfect outputs.

  • •

    A simple one-button UI with options to regenerate and manually edit notes improves user workflow efficiency and error recovery.

  • •

    Implicit metrics such as the 'edit rate'—the fraction of user edits on AI-generated text—help monitor AI output quality unobtrusively.

  • •

    Traditional prototyping methods are less effective for AI; incremental live pilots provide critical learning about AI's unpredictable outputs.

  • •

    Operational factors like quality assurance metrics impact user attitudes when AI-generated notes lower scores despite time savings.

  • •

    Human-centered collaboration between designers, data scientists, and users is essential to shape AI capabilities and discover unforeseen problems.

  • •

    AI models must remain static (non-learning) in healthcare to comply with regulations, creating challenges for ongoing improvements.

Notable Quotes

"We saw documentation time reduced by 64% after six months of using the AI tool."

"Documentation is important for liability and useful for patient handoffs, so notes must be concise yet detailed."

"Healthcare is not a silver bullet for AI; a lot of context comes from non-verbal cues where generative AI doesn’t apply."

"The unpredictable black box nature of LLMs means we had to zoom in on small problems first before seeing the bigger picture."

"We emphasized a simple one-button workflow with manual editing and regeneration to handle inevitable AI errors."

"The edit rate, our metric of human-added characters over total characters, tracks AI output quality without burdening users."

"Users were initially excited but six months later expressed frustration and uncertainty about the tool’s usefulness."

"We believe cognitive biases like frequency bias and expectation bias affected how users perceived AI errors over time."

"Our AI tool doesn’t learn from ongoing use due to regulatory constraints, which led to user frustration when performance didn’t improve."

"People are the plot twist in this journey — despite promising AI, only human connection reveals new problems and solutions."

Ask the Rosenbot
Dan Willis
Filling the Void
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
Welcome / Housekeeping
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Robin Beers
Navigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Lisanne Norman
Why I Left Research
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Asia Hoe
Partnering with Product: A Journey from Junior to Senior Design
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Greg Petroff
Software as Material—A Redux
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Terry Buckman
Wargaming (An Introduction)
2023 • Enterprise Community
Samuel Proulx
From Standards to Innovation: Why Inclusive Design Wins
2025 • Advancing Service Design 2025
Gold
Matt Stone
Scaling Empathy, A Case Study in Change Management
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Joanna Vodopivec
One Research Team for All - Influence Without Authority
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Francesca Barrientos, PhD
You Need Your Own Definition of Design Maturity
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Emily DiLeo
Stronger Together: Lessons Learned from UX Research Ops
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Christopher Noessel
AI of the now: Designing for Agents
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Changying (Z) Zheng
Practical DesignOps: From Ideas to Tools That Teams Actually Use
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Megan Blocker
A Selectively Scrappy Approach to ResearchOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Dr. Jamika D. Burge
How UX researchers can partner with (and not be replaced by) AI [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community

More Videos

Shipra Kayan

"VOC wasn’t a replacement for user research, but an enhancer that captured nuggets researchers might miss during discovery."

Shipra Kayan

How we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up

September 30, 2021

Peter Morville

"Every few years consultants come in and tidy up our mess, but as soon as they leave, we mess it all up again."

Peter Morville

The Architecture of Understanding

May 13, 2015

Renee Reid

"I was going to use everything that I had experienced, all the skills, all the successes, and become my own superpower."

Renee Reid

Becoming a ResearchH.E.R (Highly Enterprise Ready)

June 3, 2019

Dane DeSutter

"You don’t need special software to get started analyzing gestures and embodied actions; you just need video and a notepad."

Dane DeSutter

Keeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not

March 26, 2024

Sam Proulx

"Confidence is critical in online shopping because nobody wants to spend money they’re unsure about losing due to unclear controls."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

October 3, 2023

Andrew Custage

"Balance UX and CX—making the site work technically is not enough if the content or experience isn’t meaningful."

Andrew Custage Michael Mallett

The Digital Journey: Research on Consumer Frustration and Loyalty

March 29, 2023

Shelby Switzer

"It’s okay to be goofy and have fun—creating space for awkwardness and playfulness helps engagement."

Shelby Switzer

Making Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World

December 10, 2021

Llewyn Paine

"If we want our value to be defined as anything other than studies run, we must learn how to trace and articulate the actual business impact."

Llewyn Paine

Coexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration

March 11, 2025

Robin Beers

"Sensemaking is your superpower as a researcher to amplify your impact beyond user experience mechanics."

Robin Beers

Navigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change

March 13, 2025