Debunking the Myths of Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration
Summary
Key Insights
-
•
Standardizing roles in cross-disciplinary teams often creates unnecessary blame and ignores individual skills and project uniqueness.
-
•
Focusing on shared responsibilities tied to outcomes is more effective than rigid role definitions.
-
•
Co-creation and joint accountability across disciplines reduce friction and promote better team cohesion.
-
•
Bringing all disciplines into the design and research process early improves project outcomes and ownership.
-
•
Trust in distributed teams does not develop automatically; it requires deliberate relationship-building and communication.
-
•
Raising communication bandwidth by switching from asynchronous to synchronous formats can prevent frustration and trust erosion.
-
•
Ensuring all remote participants join calls individually helps level presence disparity and improves meeting effectiveness.
-
•
Early and continuous sharing of work rather than a final big reveal increases shared empathy and alignment.
-
•
Understanding the ‘how we got here’ context of a product is as important as aligning on where you’re going.
-
•
Process alone cannot guarantee great teamwork; investing in the human and messy aspects of collaboration is essential.
Notable Quotes
"Teams constantly bicker over turf blaming the various disciplines for their inability to meet deadlines."
"Research does this and design does that creates an us versus them strategy that leads to needless friction."
"Who is not in the room is just as important as who is."
"Exceptional teams are made up of individuals who reach out beyond the traditional boundaries of their own role."
"You have to know when to raise the bandwidth. If you see 10 plus people commenting in Slack, consider jumping on a video call."
"When trust is high, speed goes up and costs go down."
"People miss the water cooler moments in remote teams, so you have to create deliberate opportunities to connect."
"A shared understanding of how you got here creates a sense of purpose, not just urgency."
"The cargo cult story teaches us that form without understanding is not enough; blindly following process won’t deliver results."
"Process is neither necessary nor sufficient for great design."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We stuck with NPS because it was a pure metric with a long history we could trend, instead of muddying things with loyalty or revenue."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"Categories are dangerous but not bad."
Peter MorvilleThe Architecture of Understanding
May 13, 2015
"Only one internal hire on the UX team was a huge misopportunity for us."
Renee ReidBecoming a ResearchH.E.R (Highly Enterprise Ready)
June 3, 2019
"Language can be vague, imprecise, and even contradictory, but the body can be a bridge to understanding."
Dane DeSutterKeeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not
March 26, 2024
"Avoid strictly timed interactions because they stress everyone, especially people using screen readers or with cognitive disabilities."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
October 3, 2023
"Digital channels now have higher standards—customers expect personalization at all times."
Andrew Custage Michael MallettThe Digital Journey: Research on Consumer Frustration and Loyalty
March 29, 2023
"Silence is productive—resist the temptation to fill it immediately after asking a question."
Shelby SwitzerMaking Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World
December 10, 2021
"More than a third of content on social media sites is AI generated, creating a training problem for new AI models."
Llewyn PaineCoexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
March 11, 2025
"Simon Roberts calls this the UX ification of research, which leads to a more transactional focus on informing technology requirements."
Robin BeersNavigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change
March 13, 2025
