Rosenverse
Debunking the Myths of Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Debunking the Myths of Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration

Gold
Thursday, October 24, 2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Share the love for this talk
Debunking the Myths of Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration
Speakers: Alastair Simpson
Link:

Summary

Trying to plan and collaborate across different teams whilst creating a cohesive culture can sometimes feel like a pipe dream. This is especially true as we start to work with more distributed teams and as we add more and more specialised functions to the mix, such as Design, Research, Content Strategy, Product Management, Engineering, Data Science…oh my! There are also a few common myths which are just not true in today’s modern team environment. Come along for a few laughs as we explore a few popular myths, debunk them and arm you with a few practical tips and ideas to help you build world-class products.

Key Insights

  • Standardizing roles in cross-disciplinary teams often creates unnecessary blame and ignores individual skills and project uniqueness.

  • Focusing on shared responsibilities tied to outcomes is more effective than rigid role definitions.

  • Co-creation and joint accountability across disciplines reduce friction and promote better team cohesion.

  • Bringing all disciplines into the design and research process early improves project outcomes and ownership.

  • Trust in distributed teams does not develop automatically; it requires deliberate relationship-building and communication.

  • Raising communication bandwidth by switching from asynchronous to synchronous formats can prevent frustration and trust erosion.

  • Ensuring all remote participants join calls individually helps level presence disparity and improves meeting effectiveness.

  • Early and continuous sharing of work rather than a final big reveal increases shared empathy and alignment.

  • Understanding the ‘how we got here’ context of a product is as important as aligning on where you’re going.

  • Process alone cannot guarantee great teamwork; investing in the human and messy aspects of collaboration is essential.

Notable Quotes

"Teams constantly bicker over turf blaming the various disciplines for their inability to meet deadlines."

"Research does this and design does that creates an us versus them strategy that leads to needless friction."

"Who is not in the room is just as important as who is."

"Exceptional teams are made up of individuals who reach out beyond the traditional boundaries of their own role."

"You have to know when to raise the bandwidth. If you see 10 plus people commenting in Slack, consider jumping on a video call."

"When trust is high, speed goes up and costs go down."

"People miss the water cooler moments in remote teams, so you have to create deliberate opportunities to connect."

"A shared understanding of how you got here creates a sense of purpose, not just urgency."

"The cargo cult story teaches us that form without understanding is not enough; blindly following process won’t deliver results."

"Process is neither necessary nor sufficient for great design."

Ask the Rosenbot
Deanna Zandt
The Unspoken Complexity of “Self-Care” with Deanna Zandt
2022 • Civic Design Community
Ned Gartside
Navigating accessibility and climate
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Teresa Swingler
Look, Up in the Sky! UX/UI for Aerospace
2022 • Enterprise Community
Dante Guintu
How to Crush the Talent Crunch
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Jim Kalbach
Jazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
Lisanne Norman
Why I Left Research
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Mitchell Bernstein
Organizing Chaos: How IBM is Defining Design Systems with Sketch for an Ever-Changing AI Landscape
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Sarah Kinkade
Design Management Models in the Face of Transformation
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Adam Cutler
People + Places + Practices = Outcomes
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Jacqui Frey
Panel Discussion: Integrating DesignOps
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Tala Tayebi
Voice and influence in an age of noise
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Dr. Jamika D. Burge
Bridge Building across Research Disciplines
2021 • Advancing Research Community
Louis Rosenfeld
The Bigger Picture: A Panel Discussion
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Dr. Jamika D. Burge
A Genuine Conversation about the Future of UX Research
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Trauma-Responsive Design: Reimagining the Future of Design Now
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Sam Proulx
Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold

More Videos

Lavy Kumar

"Employees can take as much or as little time off as they want, so long as their job gets done."

Lavy Kumar Kat Temple Shan Sebastian Tara Jensen Jenn Chou

Future of Work

June 9, 2021

Andreas Huebner

"Leadership buy-in now means we get to focus on bigger, generative research questions instead of just tactical usability studies."

Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig Brookes

What Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?

March 11, 2021

Ricardo Martins

"When people answer in a similar way, they find clusters that can be used to group users."

Ricardo Martins

Unlocking the power of advanced quantitative methods

March 12, 2025

Monty Hammontree

"Satya Nadella’s leadership feels authentic—he puts empathy at the center of everything he does."

Monty Hammontree

The Future of UX Research

December 3, 2020

Benjamin Real

"We didn’t explain the philosophy behind the design ops activities, so others didn’t understand why some activities couldn’t be done outside design."

Benjamin Real

Showing the Value of DesignOps by Not Having a DesignOps Team

October 21, 2020

Kate Towsey

"You've got to slow down to go fast; make space in your schedule to think strategically."

Kate Towsey

Ask Me Anything (AMA) with Kate Towsey

April 2, 2025

Steve Portigal

"The weakest insight method might win simply because of the relationship to the power structure."

Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian Rohrer

Discussion

May 13, 2015

Sam Proulx

"Accessible foundations are built by involving voices of people with disabilities from ideation to prototyping to launch."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

March 28, 2023

Sam Proulx

"Involving people with disabilities throughout the product development cycle is crucial, from prototype reviews through to acceptance testing."

Sam Proulx

Prototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You

October 1, 2021