Accessible only to conference ticket holders.
Log in Create account Buy conference recordings
For 90 days after a conference, only paid ticket holders can watch conference videos. After that, all Gold members have access.
If you have purchased recording access and cannot see the video, please contact support.
Faster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
Summary
As AI agents accelerate early-stage product work—research synthesis, concept generation, and opportunity analysis—teams risk losing what makes research effective: shared understanding. Individuals can now produce artifacts that once took days of team discussion and critique, resulting in faster outputs but weaker collective insight. On LinkedIn’s Growth org, we saw this tension as teams adopted AI-powered research, design, and strategy tools. To address it, the UX Research team built a JTBD-based Competitive Analysis workshop paired with an AI teammate—not to replace collaboration, but to scaffold it. This pair of tools structures how teams jointly explore 0-to-1 opportunities, align on member Jobs-to-Be-Done, and analyze competitive differentiation with an AI agent in the loop. This session shares a leadership perspective on re-engineering collaboration around AI rather than letting AI erode it. I’ll show how structured, AI-assisted workshops enable both rigor and creativity—and how these practices have elevated the pace, quality, and cohesion of strategic decision-making across teams.
Key Insights
-
•
Growth PMs and UX researchers operate from fundamentally different theories of evidence, causing misalignment in priorities.
-
•
Organizational systems are optimized around PM processes, not UX research frames, privileging metrics over human-centered insights.
-
•
Common growth strategies like doubling notifications or copying features from other apps stem from short-term metric focus, not from deep problem understanding.
-
•
Simply translating research insights into PM language can lose the valuable context and reframing UX research provides.
-
•
AI tools can help bridge the gap by reasoning across both growth metrics and human-centered paradigms simultaneously.
-
•
Trust and shared understanding develop from cooperative processes, not just from clearer communication or presentations.
-
•
Structuring workshops with individual ideation, AI-supported refinement, and group negotiation helps build shared vocabulary and alignment.
-
•
Designing collaborative reasoning conditions is a key role for UX researchers beyond traditional insight delivery.
-
•
Clear agenda design, curated inputs, and defined roles improve the efficiency and outcomes of cross-paradigm workshops.
-
•
AI can act as a cognitive accelerant, providing healthy constraints and expanding thinking, fostering creativity in teams.
Notable Quotes
"This is a story about what happens when you stop trying to will others to think like you and start creating conditions under which both frames can coexist productively."
"Growth PMs think this way because it’s the only kind of thinking the system we’re working within can operationalize."
"The core question UX researchers ask is did we solve the right problem for the user, while PMs ask did the metric move."
"When you boil down all the research into actions someone might take, the thing that made our research valuable in the first place, understanding context, was all gone."
"No amount of clearer presentation or communications is going to solve this; it’s a cooperation problem."
"We’re not just translators between different ways of thinking, but architects of shared reasoning processes."
"Giving people time and space to think individually and pressure test with AI before group discussion prevents dominance by power."
"Sometimes our most valuable work isn’t the insights we produce, but the conditions we create for shared reasoning across paradigms."
"AI can provide healthy constraints, help people focus, use a common language, and act as cognitive accelerants."
"The real breakthrough was when the pilgrim’s mechanical bird spoke both ways, braiding their words together to reach the summit."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"You can build your strategy into eight pages, five, three, one, half a page, then a sentence to adapt to your audience."
Christian Crumlish Wendy Johansson Rich Mironov Aditi Ruiz Adam ThomasAfternoon Insights Panel
December 6, 2022
"You want to start with capabilities, not with a tool, and assess whether anything existing can meet those needs."
Jon Temple Kalee Dankner Bruce Falk Lauren GalanterPanel: Stacks, Security, and Stakeholders: The Hidden Work of UXR Tool Procurement
March 12, 2026
"Our brains are like Ferrari with several petabytes of memory, but most of our thoughts are negative."
Himanshu BharadwajIf design had a heart
April 16, 2026
"Social opportunities to connect with each other actually offset the remote fatigue and isolation that many were feeling."
Nicole UmphressDelivering Design Education During a Global Pandemic: Lessons Learned
June 9, 2022
"I gave birth to two things at once: my talk and my son Mateo within two days."
Smitha Papolu Nova Wehman-Brown Melissa Schmidt Adam MenterTheme 3 Discussion
January 8, 2024
"Marketers don’t try very interesting things when their confidence in data is low, which can create a downward spiraling reinforcing loop."
Sarah FlamionComplex Problem? Add Clarity by Combining Research and Systems Thinking
March 31, 2020
"If one person is remote, then everybody should be remote—it creates equality in collaboration."
Marjorie Stainback Molly Fargotstein Stephanie MarshWhat Research Ops Professionals Have Learned from COVID-19
July 16, 2020
"Books are semantically very rich and thus pull content much more effectively in our vector database than conference talks."
Louis Rosenfeld Peter Van DijckGenAI for UXers: A Rosenbot Demo and Discussion
September 11, 2025
"Focus your research report on the three most influential stakeholders, not everyone."
Jerome “Axle” BrownHow to Use Self-Directed Learning to Ensure Your Research Insights are Heard and Acted Upon
March 11, 2021
