Rosenverse

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

A Consistent Culture of Design
Gold
Thursday, May 14, 2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Share the love for this talk
A Consistent Culture of Design
Speakers: Phil Gilbert
Link:

Summary

Phil Gilbert details IBM's transformative design initiative started in 2012 aimed at embedding design deeply within a massive engineering-driven culture. The program focuses on cultivating a sustainable design culture through a 'culture quotient' framework that measures artifacts created, the culture's embrace of these artifacts, and their longevity. IBM committed to hiring 1,000 formally trained designers to fill a critical gap, simultaneously creating partnerships with top design universities and building rigorous internship programs led by Devon O'Brien from SCAD. Gilbert emphasizes that change requires a collective opt-in, multidisciplinary teams, and avoiding top-down imposition to drive adoption effectively. They advanced IBM Design Thinking, a lightweight, scalable approach fostering collaboration beyond designers to product managers, marketing, finance, and legal teams. IBM reinvented its workspaces, notably the Austin studio, focusing on flow and movement rather than static open space—driven by practical innovations like mobile, reconfigurable walls. Notable people involved include Adam Cutler overseeing 1,500 designers, Doug Powell managing education for 380,000 IBMers, and university hires like Denise Burton and Doug Powell bringing deep industry experience. Gilbert highlights IBM's shift from rigid design system uniformity to a flexible design language that empowers choice and implementation independence. The program also leverages modern collaboration tools (Slack, GitHub, Mirally) and global studios in Germany, UK, China, and Tel Aviv to nurture a connected design community. The transformation is a long-term commitment, with visible cultural change expected by 2018-2020, driven by passionate buy-in, reinforced by quick wins, and powered by design leaders like Elliott Noise promoting unity without uniformity. Gilbert ends with a story from Devon O'Brien on teaching collaboration and graceful failure to interns as the essence of IBM’s design culture.

Key Insights

  • IBM's design transformation is driven by a culture quotient formula: artifacts generated, cultural embrace, and duration of adoption.

  • A sustainable design culture requires engaging everyone, not just designers, through an opt-in approach.

  • IBM set a goal to hire 1,000 formally trained designers in five years, partnering with top design universities worldwide.

  • Design thinking at IBM is practiced by over 100 multidisciplinary product teams involving non-design roles like marketing and legal.

  • IBM’s design language is flexible and implementation agnostic, moving away from rigid uniform front-end frameworks of the past.

  • Physical workspaces, like IBM’s Austin studio, emphasize movement, modular walls, and maker spaces instead of static open offices.

  • A robust, rigorous intern program called Maelstrom, created by Devon O’Brien, embeds interns in real, high-impact projects sponsored by IBM's business units.

  • The program ensures designers have formal career paths equivalent to engineers, including distinguished titles and recognition.

  • To scale culture change, IBM leverages modern collaboration tools like Slack, GitHub, Mirally, and live streaming of paper artifacts.

  • Elliott Noise's principle of unity, not uniformity, guides IBM’s design culture to embrace diversity while working toward common goals.

Notable Quotes

"We embarked on a program to create a sustainable culture of design across 380,000 people at IBM."

"Culture quotient is artifacts times embrace times duration — that’s how you understand culture."

"You have to do everything with everybody in order to affect change."

"IBM Design Thinking isn’t just about designers; it’s about product managers, engineers, marketing, finance, legal—everybody."

"We chose an opt-in program because forcing design top-down would have failed."

"Our design language gives people choices, it's implementation agnostic, and it’s not a guideline but a language."

"Our Austin studio was purpose built with mobile walls to create movement and flow, not just static open space."

"We went from having no formal design career path to offering titles like Design Principal, equal to Distinguished Engineer."

"Design thinking is the scientific method for the 21st century."

"We show people how to collaborate like crazy and how to fail gracefully."

Ask the Rosenbot
Jemma Ahmed
Convergent Research Techniques in Customer Journey Mapping
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Kathleen Asjes
Research Democratization: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Ariel Kennan
Theme 2 Intro
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Laureen Kattan
Centering Patients and Clinicians in a Complex Government Ecosystem
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Farid Sabitov
Theme Four Intro
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Christopher Noessel
AI of the now: Designing for Agents
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Victor Udoewa
Radical Participatory Research: Decolonizing Participatory Processes
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Steve Chaparro
Bringing Into Alignment Brand, Culture and Space (Videoconference)
2020 • DesignOps Community
Max Gadney
Assessing UX jobs for impact in climate
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group (Rosenfeld Community)
Sean Fitzell
Craft of User Research: Building Out Jobs to be Done Maps
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Sam Proulx
To Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Bria Alexander
State of DesignOps Panel
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Victor Udoewa
Radical Participatory Design: Decolonizing Participatory Design Processes
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Doug Powell
Closing Keynote: Design at Scale
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Alexia Cohen
Increasing Health Equity and Improving the Service Experience for Under-Served Latine Communities in Arizona
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Terry Buckman
Wargaming (An Introduction) (Videoconference)
2023 • Enterprise Community

More Videos

Jack Moffett

"We embed UX selectively in a few value streams and try to train others to balance research and design activities on their own."

Jack Moffett

SAFe or Sorry? (Videoconference)

May 29, 2019

Tricia Wang

"If organizations want success globally, they must invest to customize designs for local cultures rather than standardize everything blindly."

Tricia Wang

SCALE: Discussion

June 15, 2018

Fredrik Matheson

"Sometimes fixing tax systems by leveraging existing data completely removes user burden and errors."

Fredrik Matheson

First-time users, longtime strategies: Why Parkinson’s Law is making you less effective at work – and how to design a fix.

June 8, 2016

Laine Riley Prokay

"For senior employees, we ask them to hold difficult conversations that question projects, processes, and assumptions that may be harmful to others."

Laine Riley Prokay

How DesignOps can Drive Inclusive Career Ladders for All

September 30, 2021

Shipra Kayan

"We had to push through analysis paralysis and trust our guts on what to prioritize for product changes."

Shipra Kayan

How we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up

September 30, 2021

Kristen Guth, Ph.D.

"Slowing down with research can help us move faster overall."

Kristen Guth, Ph.D.

Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment

March 28, 2023

Joi Freeman

"Diversity sitting only at the bottom levels narrows all the work we do from the top down."

Joi Freeman

A New Vantage Point: Building a Pipeline for Multifaceted Research(ers)

March 30, 2020

Victor Udoewa

"You can't rely solely on numbers; you need to understand the story behind user actions."

Victor Udoewa

Theme One Intro

March 27, 2023

Peter Merholz

"A team larger than seven people should probably be split; smaller teams can do focused and effective work."

Peter Merholz

Customer-Centered Design Organizations

June 8, 2017