A Consistent Culture of Design
Summary
Phil Gilbert outlines IBM's ambitious design transformation over two and a half years, aiming to embed a culture of design across 380,000 employees. He introduces the 'culture quotient' framework, emphasizing artifacts created by behaviors, the degree to which the culture embraces them, and duration of that embrace. IBM’s approach includes hiring over 450 formally trained designers, building relationships with top design schools like SCAD and RISD, and surrounding junior hires with experienced design leads such as Doug Powell and Denise Burton. Gilbert highlights the creation of rigorous intern programs led by Devon O’Brien from SCAD and the development of IBM Design Thinking as a lightweight, collaborative practice empowering multidisciplinary teams including product managers and engineers. Instead of a top-down mandate, IBM adopted an opt-in approach, accelerating early success and sustainable adoption. They also introduced a design language that balances consistency with implementation freedom, and purpose-built flexible design studios like the Austin location, encouraging movement and collaboration. Global studios in Germany, England, China, and other locations form a network unified by digital tools and collaboration platforms. Gilbert closes with cultural notes on change as a constant, unity without uniformity, and the importance of empowerment, collaboration, and the willingness to fail gracefully, validated by devotion from leadership including CEO Ginni Rometty.
Key Insights
-
•
Design culture can be understood and shaped using a culture quotient formula: artifacts created × level of cultural embrace × duration of embrace.
-
•
IBM set an ambitious goal to hire 1,000 formally trained designers within five years, hiring over 450 in two and a half years.
-
•
IBM emphasizes 'people plus practices plus places = artifacts' to generate meaningful design outcomes.
-
•
IBM Design Thinking is a lightweight practice focusing on collaboration around artifacts, not rigid processes.
-
•
An opt-in approach to embedding design thinking helped IBM accelerate early wins, avoiding top-down enforcement.
-
•
IBM built deep relationships with top design universities to recruit diverse new talent directly from schools such as SCAD, RISD, and Stanford D-School.
-
•
IBM created formal career paths for designers parallel to engineering, including Distinguished Designer and Design Principal levels.
-
•
IBM’s design language focuses on giving broad guidance instead of rigid pattern libraries, encouraging implementation freedom and evolution.
-
•
The Austin design studio was purpose-built with movable walls and spaces to foster dynamic, radical collaboration and creativity.
-
•
The program’s success depends on empowering not only designers but all IBM employees to become design thinkers who opt into the culture.
Notable Quotes
"We could create a sustainable culture of design and use it as our leading edge weapon of transformation."
"Culture isn’t just behavior over time, it’s the artifacts that culture creates and embraces over time."
"People plus practices plus places equals artifacts."
"IBM Design Thinking is about collaborating around artifacts and frameworks, not prescribing the process teams must follow."
"We decided to make it an opt-in program and that accelerated early wins and self-selected positive outcomes."
"Design thinking is the scientific method for the 21st century."
"We had an engineering culture that confused uniformity with design, and consistency with design."
"Our design language gives broad ditches on either side of the road with some nuance, but no rigid libraries at first."
"The Austin studio’s walls can be put up and taken down by a 90-pound person on a Home Depot shopping cart."
"We’re showing people how to collaborate like crazy and how to fail gracefully."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Trust with your team needs to be established and continuously nurtured because tough situations arise quickly."
Anna Avrekh Dr. John Pagonis Klara Pelcl Sina SchreiberExpert Panel: Leading in and with Research
March 10, 2022
"We have these four pillars—purpose, people, process, and progress—that ground our thinking about UX research's future."
Taylor KlassmanShaping the Next Era of UX Research: Collaborative Forum
March 11, 2025
"Our standard research frameworks and tools are often inadequate for addressing complex social problems."
Dr. Jamika D. Burge Steve Portigal Alba Villamil Sam LadnerThe Future of Research: Bridging the Gaps
July 29, 2021
"During testing sensitive subjects, have relevant resources at the ready, like shelter beds for participants in need."
Marisa BernsteinIt Takes GRIT: Lessons from the Small, but Mighty World of Civic Usability Testing
December 9, 2021
"The goal is that design systems become the way that we do work, just like when you do Agile, you don’t talk about it—you just do it."
Dan Mall“Ask Me Anything” with Dan Mall, Author of Upcoming Rosenfeld Title, Design that Scales
October 2, 2023
"Six million people worldwide have died of COVID. Millions more are dealing with lasting effects."
Chris GeisonTheme 1 Intro
March 9, 2022
"If someone only reads the first few paragraphs or attends the first 10 minutes, they should still get the key takeaways."
Bruce GillespieLearning from journalism: Balancing impactful communication with compassionate storytelling
March 13, 2025
"If you put garbage in, garbage comes out – AI reflects the biases in its training data."
Nancy DouyonWe'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex
June 15, 2018
"There’s never really conflicting futures—everyone wants to take care of the most vulnerable children; you just have to find the bridge between visions."
Liz EbengoThe Burden on Children: The Cost of Insufficient Post-Conflict Services and Pathways Forward
December 4, 2024
