Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young

Thursday, December 12, 2019 • Advancing Research Community
Share the love for this talk
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young
Speakers: Indi Young
Link:

Summary

In tech culture, everyone is hell-bent on coming up with answers and solutions. We all assume we know what the person’s problem is; rarely does tech culture start at the very beginning, understanding the variety of approaches real people have to their real purposes and different moods and contexts. Instead, we build an idea into experiments to see if it solves the imagined “problem.” Sound familiar? We can’t go on solving things based on our own thin understanding of how others perceive the problem. We can’t go on assuming everyone is in the same mood and context. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Indeed, we have done a lot of accidental harm in the world with the assumption that the tools we design are “neutral.” We need to get better at paying attention. We need to slow down and gather a richer, more nutritious understanding of the people we are trying to support. And we need to point a beam of light into possible future outcomes. Let’s put equal emphasis on the problem. Spending equal time in the problem space generates rich understanding. Understanding the depths, perspectives, horizons and histories of the way people achieve their purposes opens up loads more opportunities. We can begin making solutions that eschew “engagement” to truly support different people in different ways. The problem space deserves more attention and a slow cycle all of its own.

Key Insights

  • Most organizations overemphasize solutions and ignore deep understanding of users’ purposes in the problem space.

  • Big data correlations often lead to misleading conclusions if context and underlying reasoning aren’t explored.

  • Demographic breakdowns like age or gender rarely capture the true diversity of user thinking and motivations.

  • Thinking Styles are a more meaningful way to segment users based on their purposes and mental approaches.

  • Listening sessions provide rich qualitative data necessary to build cognitive empathy and uncover deep user insights.

  • Cognitive empathy is a skill that requires going beyond surface observations to understand people’s inner voices.

  • Technology disciplines are immature compared to fields like architecture or museum design that prioritize varied user purposes.

  • Most tech companies operate without proper ethical research oversight (e.g., institutional review boards).

  • Jobs to Be Done is useful for strategy but inadequate alone without rich qualitative problem space research.

  • Rich problem space research results remain valuable and relevant for years, unlike short-term solution testing data.

Notable Quotes

"We live in a solution culture that glorifies people who create solutions but not those who create knowledge."

"Correlation is not causation, and a lot of people in technology don’t understand that."

"Research theater is when results are designed just to create a reaction, not real understanding."

"Purpose is a super important word—understanding what a person is trying to get done, not just their behavior."

"You can’t meaningfully segment users by demographics alone if you want to support their real purposes."

"Cognitive empathy only forms with depth; you can’t build it at the surface level."

"Empathy is not sensitivity or an emotion—it is a skill that you have."

"Most technology research is not research at all but at best focus group testing, and often lacks ethics."

"We have this piece of glass and there’s a person on the other side, but we don’t understand their purpose."

"You have to build all the puzzle pieces with clear summaries before the patterns come together in mental models."

Ask the Rosenbot
James Wieselman Schulman
Research is a team sport: advancing the work when everyone does the research
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Erin May
Distributed, Democratized, Decentralized: Finding a Research Model to Support Your Org
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Scott Jensen
Short Take #2: UX/Product Lessons from Your Industry Peers
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Dr. Jamika D. Burge
The Future of Research: Bridging the Gaps
2021 • Advancing Research Community
Mary-Lynne Williams
Exit Interview #4: From Product Design Leadership to Sound Healing
2026 • Rosenfeld Community
Carol Scott
Avoid Harming Your Team and Users: Promoting Care and Brand Reputation with Trauma-Informed UX Practices
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Llewyn Paine
Coexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Sean McKay
Coexisting with non-researchers: Practical strategies for a democratized research future
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Rob Mitzel
The Tale of Two Companies: Building a Successful UX Practice in a Century-Old Enterprise
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Abby Covert
Panel: Collaboration Tools
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Shahrzad Samadzadeh
What Is My Value? Two Takes and Some Mistakes
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
John Maeda
Making Sense of Enterprise UX
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Natalie Dunbar
DesignOps and Content Strategy: Envisioning the Future Together
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Fredrik Matheson
First-time users, longtime strategies: Why Parkinson’s Law is making you less effective at work – and how to design a fix.
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Aaron Stienstra
Leveraging Civic Design to Advance Equity and Rebuild Trust in the US Federal Government
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Nova Wehman-Brown
We've Never Done This Before
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold

More Videos

Taylor Jennings

"Seeing product managers and designers’ aha moments when they realize how impactful the tool is was great."

Taylor Jennings Joe Nelson Alex Knoll

Repository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research

March 9, 2022

Nicole Aleong

"Speculation fills in the gaps where past experience fails us, often seen in hesitation or pauses."

Nicole Aleong

Future Orientations to Everyday Life: Futures Anthropology as a Methodology

March 26, 2024

Jeff Gothelf

"Hackathons are a fun activity to spend some creative time together and then go back to making the stuff that we normally make."

Jeff Gothelf

Innovation Studios: the Engines of Enterprise Experimentation

May 14, 2015

Saara Kamppari-Miller

"One superpower of ops humans is making problems and gaps visible to build awareness and drive change."

Saara Kamppari-Miller

DesignOps for Inclusive Design and Accessibility

May 26, 2022

Tess Dixon

"Having questions about team happiness broken into person, team and product helps clear up confusion in large organizations."

Tess Dixon

C'mon Get Happy

September 29, 2021

Liam Thurston

"Mastery is achievable, whether you have 10,000 hours or not—it’s about building that portfolio and case studies."

Liam Thurston

Why Your Design Team Is Quitting, And How To Fix It

June 10, 2022

Ian Swinson

"Leadership doesn’t only mean managing; it can be mentoring, product leadership, or technical influence."

Ian Swinson

Designing and Driving UX Careers

June 8, 2016

Leisa Reichelt

"At Atlassian, many confident non-researchers were already doing lots of research, which was an opportunity and a challenge."

Leisa Reichelt

Opening Keynote: Operating in Context

November 7, 2018

Rachael Greene

"Getting to know someone as a person first—the vibe check—is the first step to successful UX research collaboration."

Rachael Greene Alison Davis

Building a Design Ops Practice that Really Works (Most of the Time)

October 2, 2025