Rosenverse
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young

Thursday, December 12, 2019 • Advancing Research Community
Share the love for this talk
Paying Better Attention to the Problem with Indi Young
Speakers: Indi Young
Link:

Summary

In tech culture, everyone is hell-bent on coming up with answers and solutions. We all assume we know what the person’s problem is; rarely does tech culture start at the very beginning, understanding the variety of approaches real people have to their real purposes and different moods and contexts. Instead, we build an idea into experiments to see if it solves the imagined “problem.”

Sound familiar?

We can’t go on solving things based on our own thin understanding of how others perceive the problem. We can’t go on assuming everyone is in the same mood and context. There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Indeed, we have done a lot of accidental harm in the world with the assumption that the tools we design are “neutral.” We need to get better at paying attention. We need to slow down and gather a richer, more nutritious understanding of the people we are trying to support. And we need to point a beam of light into possible future outcomes.

Let’s put equal emphasis on the problem. Spending equal time in the problem space generates rich understanding. Understanding the depths, perspectives, horizons and histories of the way people achieve their purposes opens up loads more opportunities. We can begin making solutions that eschew “engagement” to truly support different people in different ways.

The problem space deserves more attention and a slow cycle all of its own.

Key Insights

  • •

    Most organizations overemphasize solutions and ignore deep understanding of users’ purposes in the problem space.

  • •

    Big data correlations often lead to misleading conclusions if context and underlying reasoning aren’t explored.

  • •

    Demographic breakdowns like age or gender rarely capture the true diversity of user thinking and motivations.

  • •

    Thinking Styles are a more meaningful way to segment users based on their purposes and mental approaches.

  • •

    Listening sessions provide rich qualitative data necessary to build cognitive empathy and uncover deep user insights.

  • •

    Cognitive empathy is a skill that requires going beyond surface observations to understand people’s inner voices.

  • •

    Technology disciplines are immature compared to fields like architecture or museum design that prioritize varied user purposes.

  • •

    Most tech companies operate without proper ethical research oversight (e.g., institutional review boards).

  • •

    Jobs to Be Done is useful for strategy but inadequate alone without rich qualitative problem space research.

  • •

    Rich problem space research results remain valuable and relevant for years, unlike short-term solution testing data.

Notable Quotes

"We live in a solution culture that glorifies people who create solutions but not those who create knowledge."

"Correlation is not causation, and a lot of people in technology don’t understand that."

"Research theater is when results are designed just to create a reaction, not real understanding."

"Purpose is a super important word—understanding what a person is trying to get done, not just their behavior."

"You can’t meaningfully segment users by demographics alone if you want to support their real purposes."

"Cognitive empathy only forms with depth; you can’t build it at the surface level."

"Empathy is not sensitivity or an emotion—it is a skill that you have."

"Most technology research is not research at all but at best focus group testing, and often lacks ethics."

"We have this piece of glass and there’s a person on the other side, but we don’t understand their purpose."

"You have to build all the puzzle pieces with clear summaries before the patterns come together in mental models."

Ask the Rosenbot
Anat Fintzi
Delivering at Scale: Making Traction with Resistant Partners
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Margot Bloomstein
Fostering Trust in Your Brand and Beyond
2020 • Enterprise Community
Billy Carlson
Tips to Utilize Wireframes to Tell an Effective Product Story
2023 • Enterprise UX 2023
Gold
Vasileios Xanthopoulos
A Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approach to User-Centric Maturity at Scale
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Andrew Webster
Scaling Design Capability: How Involved Should You Be?
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Patrick Boehler
Fishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Nicole Umphress
Delivering Design Education During a Global Pandemic: Lessons Learned
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Dan Ward
Failure Friday #1 with Dan Ward
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Irina Tikhonova
Small Wins, Big Impact: Leveraging and Elevating User Engagement
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Saara Kamppari-Miller
DesignOps for Inclusive Design and Accessibility
2022 • DesignOps Community
Jen Cardello
Standardizing Product Merits for Leaders, Designers, and Everyone
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Dan Willis
Enterprise Storytelling Sessions
2016 • Enterprise UX 2016
Gold
Katie Hansen
Finding the unknown in the known: Harnessing meta-analysis and literature review
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Kristin Sundermeyer
Design Ops Metrics
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Dr. Jamika D. Burge
Theme 3 Intro
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Indi Young
Thinking styles: Mend hidden cracks in your market
2025 • Rosenfeld Community

More Videos

Shipra Kayan

"Going from 100 to 200 people, suddenly product managers started hearing from a dozen people a week with conflicting requests."

Shipra Kayan

How we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up

September 30, 2021

Peter Morville

"Categories are dangerous but not bad."

Peter Morville

The Architecture of Understanding

May 13, 2015

Renee Reid

"Only one internal hire on the UX team was a huge misopportunity for us."

Renee Reid

Becoming a ResearchH.E.R (Highly Enterprise Ready)

June 3, 2019

Dane DeSutter

"Gesture and embodied actions will be a key tool for understanding user experience as computing moves beyond traditional screen-based interactions."

Dane DeSutter

Keeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not

March 26, 2024

Sam Proulx

"Confidence is critical in online shopping because nobody wants to spend money they’re unsure about losing due to unclear controls."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

October 3, 2023

Andrew Custage

"While technical errors matter, broader issues like content relevance and navigation create more mission failures."

Andrew Custage Michael Mallett

The Digital Journey: Research on Consumer Frustration and Loyalty

March 29, 2023

Shelby Switzer

"Zoom fatigue is real, people are not necessarily keen to go into another Zoom meeting even if they think it’s valuable."

Shelby Switzer

Making Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World

December 10, 2021

Llewyn Paine

"Prompting is a specialized skill, just like statistics or in-depth interviewing; the wrong wording can bias your results."

Llewyn Paine

Coexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration

March 11, 2025

Robin Beers

"Learning is the new knowing, and researchers are catalysts of organizational learning."

Robin Beers

Navigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change

March 13, 2025