Summary
Did you know that the SUS creates biases in your research, affecting one in five people? That’s right! People with disabilities, especially those who use assistive technology, are not considered by most of the questions in the SUS. When the SUS was invented, the author encouraged people to change it to suit different needs. In this talk, Samuel Proulx and Abid Virani from Fable will discuss how Fable adapted the SUS to work for assistive technology users. Drawing from over five thousand hours of research and testing involving assistive technology users, we created the Accessible Usability Scale (AUS). This presentation will include trends in AUS responses since it was released in December of 2020.
Key Insights
-
•
Assistive technology users fall broadly into three groups: screen reader users, screen magnification users, and alternative navigation users.
-
•
Screen reader users often face the greatest usability challenges due to lack of backup navigation options.
-
•
Screen magnification tools sometimes incorporate screen reader features to reduce eye strain and aid users with partial vision loss.
-
•
Alternative navigation users leverage multiple input methods, including voice commands, head mice, and coordinate grids, to overcome interaction barriers.
-
•
Traditional usability labs are poorly suited for testing with assistive technology users because they use unfamiliar setups that aren't customized.
-
•
Remote usability testing better captures authentic user experiences by allowing assistive technology users to test in their optimized environments.
-
•
The original System Usability Scale (SUS) includes language and assumptions that are often unclear or irrelevant to assistive technology users.
-
•
Fable developed an Accessible Usability Scale (AUS), modifying SUS questions to focus on specific features and removing technical assumptions for better relevance.
-
•
Experience level with assistive technology and timing of disability onset deeply influence users’ mental models and usability perceptions.
-
•
Usability should be assessed on both accessibility and efficiency — a feature that takes much longer for assistive technology users to complete may be considered inaccessible.
Notable Quotes
"Assistive technology is a group of technologies that people with disabilities use to access computers, grouped mainly into screen readers, magnification, and alternative navigation."
"The primary customization for screen reader users is speed — expert users can listen to synthetic voices at over 300 words per minute and fully understand."
"Magnification tools may include screen reader features because users can get eye strain and prefer to have content read aloud from a specific spot."
"If a screen reader can’t activate or describe a button, the user has no backup other than getting someone with sight involved."
"Traditional usability labs force assistive technology users to use unfamiliar setups, which can drastically impact their performance."
"Remote testing helps users be in comfortable, accessible environments with fully customized assistive technology setups."
"I am a technical person and I can't use this system — sometimes you don’t need a technical person, you just need someone who can see to help with barriers."
"Accessibility is a spectrum, not a checkbox — some features might require assistance but the rest of the product can be fully accessible."
"We’ve ruled out self-reporting skill levels because novice users often overestimate their expertise and near-experts underestimate theirs."
"It’s not just user skill with the system, but also the broader ways people use technology that determines their experience and accessibility needs."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Scale isn’t just about quantity, it’s about the quality and impact you have on the outcomes of the organization."
Standardizing Product Merits for Leaders, Designers, and Everyone
June 15, 2018
"You can mine metadata from your platform to spot emerging patterns and commoditize new components."
Simon WardleyMaps and Topographical Intelligence (Videoconference)
January 31, 2019
"The Reflexive Compass helps us discern bias patterns early, take accountability, and measure impact."
Sandra CamachoCreating More Bias-Proof Designs
January 22, 2025
"Taking responsibility starts with an apology and seeking regular feedback."
Darian DavisLessons from a Toxic Work Relationship
January 8, 2024
"Providing more holistic recommendations helped us gain more trust and buy-in from stakeholders, increasing UX maturity."
Fisayo Osilaja[Demo] The AI edge: From researcher to strategist
June 4, 2024
"Empowering maker culture invites everyone to be part of a collective endeavor far beyond any individual."
Uday GajendarThe Wicked Craft of Enterprise UX
May 13, 2015
"We formed a small core task force empowered to make decisions to avoid delays from formal reviews."
Davis Neable Guy SegalHow to Drive a Design Project When you Don’t Have a Design Team
June 10, 2021
"If you come with a big idea, they’ll try to dial you back to the smallest iota you can test first."
Eniola OluwoleLessons From the DesignOps Journey of the World's Largest Travel Site
October 24, 2019
"Product managers feel design is a black box; they want visibility, transparency, and accountability on timelines."
Aurobinda Pradhan Shashank DeshpandeIntroduction to Collaborative DesignOps using Cubyts
September 9, 2022