Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Puzzled? How to Coordinate Humans for Complex Challenges
Summary
How do we coordinate people for complex challenges? Certainly not with traditional work structures, designed to optimize for performance. Rather, we need new ways of working—new structures—that have been specifically designed to coordinate people for understanding. We'll look at a framework that can be used by teams, organizations, and other groups of humans working on complex problems. Stephen P. Anderson is a speaker and author who spends too much thinking about visual collaboration, how people learn, and board games; not necessarily in that order. Oh, and he’s on a mission: To make learning the hard stuff fun, by creating ‘things to think with’ and ‘spaces’ for generative play. This mission has led Stephen to MURAL, where he facilitates design strategy and innovation. Stephen's newest book, Figure It Out: Getting From Information to Understanding, has been described as both “required reading for designers and anyone else who needs to explain things” and a book that will “change the way you see the world.”
Key Insights
-
•
Complex problems differ fundamentally from complicated problems by involving unknown variables, shifting participants, and unclear success criteria.
-
•
Traditional top-down management structures often fail to coordinate people effectively on complex challenges.
-
•
Just enough structure—no more—is vital to prevent both chaos and rigid control when coordinating teams.
-
•
Cultivating shared language and standards is crucial; vague or specialized language can hinder true agreement and alignment.
-
•
Invisible environments like shared vision, mission, and values shape team coordination but must be actively lived, not just documented.
-
•
Designing visible environments—physical or virtual spaces—can shape group behavior and collaboration outcomes.
-
•
Psychological safety is foundational for teams to learn fast and innovate, emerging from deep listening, empathy, and interpersonal trust.
-
•
Accumulating multiple perspectives through drawing, analogies, and frameworks enriches understanding of complex challenges.
-
•
Adult development models explain why groups may act less mature than individuals, especially during frequent organizational resets.
-
•
Metaphors like gardening help in framing culture cultivation, emphasizing ongoing care, attention, and shared responsibility.
Notable Quotes
"All these traditional ways managers tell employees what to do probably don’t apply in complex problem contexts."
"We need just enough structure and no more to avoid chaos or stifling control."
"Until we clarify our language, we’ll agree on everything but not truly agree."
"Specialists would rather share their toothbrush than their language."
"The smartest person in the room is the room itself."
"Psychological safety isn’t created by an initiative but through a thousand tiny habits in language and behavior."
"If you want psychological safety, you have to start with self-awareness and deep listening."
"Teams often reset every 18 months and regress to infancy in trust and decision-making."
"A gardening metaphor fits culture better than cold, invisible icebergs because it highlights nurturing and growth."
"Drawing pictures together helps reduce interpretation and share perspectives effectively."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"As manual tasks get automated, individuals can focus on higher-value tasks and training machine learning systems."
Lavy Kumar Kat Temple Shan Sebastian Tara Jensen Jenn ChouFuture of Work
June 9, 2021
"Design and research at Compass have become so integrated that we become these powerful partners driving the product vision."
Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig BrookesWhat Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?
March 11, 2021
"Customers can answer what the researcher wants to hear in surveys, making attitude only 28% predictive of real behavior."
Ricardo MartinsUnlocking the power of advanced quantitative methods
March 12, 2025
"Our mission is to empower everybody to learn; not the few learning on behalf of the many."
Monty HammontreeThe Future of UX Research
December 3, 2020
"The C-suite often sees big change as resistance to change rather than needs for careful transition and impact understanding."
Benjamin RealShowing the Value of DesignOps by Not Having a DesignOps Team
October 21, 2020
"It is impossible for one research ops person to do all the things expected in job descriptions."
Kate TowseyAsk Me Anything (AMA) with Kate Towsey
April 2, 2025
"When you look at data without training, confirmation bias makes you just find what you already believe."
Steve Portigal Chris Chapo Kelly Goto Christian RohrerDiscussion
May 13, 2015
"Lack of confidence caused by unlabeled or difficult controls often leads assistive tech users to give up on purchases."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
March 28, 2023
"Screen reader users need semantic structure that graphical prototypes typically don’t have, like labeled headings, controls, tables, and landmarks."
Sam ProulxPrototype Reviews, People With Disabilities, and You
October 1, 2021
