Rosenverse
5 Antifragile Strategies for a DesignOps 2.0

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

5 Antifragile Strategies for a DesignOps 2.0

Gold
Monday, September 23, 2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Share the love for this talk
5 Antifragile Strategies for a DesignOps 2.0
Speakers: Silke Bochat
Link:

Summary

The term "anti-fragile" comes from Nassim Nicholas Taleb's book "Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder." It describes systems, organizations, or entities that not only withstand shocks, volatility, and stressors but benefit and grow stronger from them. The current state of design is undoubtedly challenging and will continue to be volatile We need strategies that move us out of defense mode, beyond resilience & mere product delivery, and position us as indispensable during times of transformation. In this talk, we explore five anti-fragile strategies for DesignOps 2.0, that will inspire you: New Work Models & Hiring Strategies, Ops beyond Design, Interconnectivity, Rise of the Chief of Staff, and (Anticipatory) Destination Teams.

Key Insights

  • Economic fragility has shifted company focus from innovation to short-term efficiency, reducing design maturity and strategic investment in design.

  • Hiring managers must be directly involved in hiring to avoid unconscious bias and ensure team diversity, especially age and complementary thinking styles.

  • New work models like job sharing, lateral assignments, and hiring designers into non-design roles spread risk and increase team agility.

  • Expanding design ops roles beyond design teams into HR and enterprise functions amplifies their strategic impact and resourcefulness.

  • Mapping decision-making points and identifying hidden pre-decisions is critical to influencing design-related outcomes early and effectively.

  • Enterprise digital infrastructure and software fragmentation present new challenges and opportunities for interconnected design ops involvement.

  • The chief of staff role in design includes three archetypes: the Whip (operative troubleshooter), the Quarterback (pipeline leader), and the Forward (strategic change agent).

  • Destination thinking—planning a future vision for the design team and organization—is essential for transitioning through ongoing disruptions and uncertainty.

  • Future studies and speculative design techniques can identify emerging roles, skillsets, and organizational structures needed for anti-fragility.

  • Proactive experimentation through pilots and role testing allows design teams to prove value and adapt to evolving business environments without waiting for permission.

Notable Quotes

"Design is enabling, enabling function and therefore it was invested in as IP and USP, but now it is seen more as a resource and expense that is questioned."

"Please don’t delegate hiring to HR—hiring managers must set clear criteria and be personally involved to avoid bias."

"When have you hired the last time someone over 50 or someone who is disruptive and not just culture fit? You need those complementary people."

"Design ops is actually all about fragility. We do stability, security, planning, but can we add more experimentation and comfort with ambiguity?"

"Think about who decides what, when, where, by which criteria and how these decisions connect—this helps influence decision making."

"Chief of staff roles can be the Whip who troubleshoots operational issues, the Quarterback who frees the chief design officer, or the Forward who drives strategic foresight."

"If you do nothing, you cannot influence the future. Destination thinking shifts you from reactive to proactive future-oriented leadership."

"Plans are useless, but planning is indispensable. You have to keep moving forwards even if the destination keeps changing."

"Hiring designers in non-design functions spreads headcount across sponsors so if one area faces cuts, the whole team doesn’t suffer."

"You prove value without asking for permission by running pilots and experiments, then move the entire team into the new direction if it works."

Ask the Rosenbot
Lily Aduana
5 Reasons to Bring Your Recruiting in-House (and How To Do It)
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Charles Lee
Building a New Home for the Atlassian Design System
2020 • Enterprise Community
Neil Barrie
Widening the Aperture: The Case for Taking a Broader Lens to the Dialogue between Products and Culture
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW
Trauma-Responsive Design: Reimagining the Future of Design Now
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Catt Small
What's Next for ICs: Exploring Staff and Principal Designer Roles
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Peter Van Dijck
Coffee with Lou #4: Taking a Peek Under the Rosenbot's Hood
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Holly Cole
Understanding Experiences: When you have to do more than work
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Erin May
Distributed, Democratized, Decentralized: Finding a Research Model to Support Your Org
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Stefanie Owens
Optimizing for Outcomes: Transformation Design in Systems at Scale
2024 • Advancing Service Design 2024
Gold
Kurt McCulloch
Faster alone, further together: Rebuilding collaboration in the age of AI research
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Mariah Hay
BUILD: Discussion
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Mark Boulton
Ops without Designers
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Russ Unger
Onboarding: The Ecosystem, not the Afterthought
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Lija Hogan
Doing more with more: Lessons from the Front Lines of Democratization
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Lada Gorlenko
Theme 1: Discussion
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Dorelle Rabinowitz
The Magic Word is Trust
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold

More Videos

Iain McMaster

"Leadership needs to give specific directions to open up space for collaboration and inclusion."

Iain McMaster IHan Cheng

Design and Product: from Frenemy to Harmony

November 29, 2023

Bria Alexander

"OKRs are not one-size-fits-all; you have to shape them based on your organizational context and culture."

Bria Alexander Benson Low Natalya Pemberton Stephanie Goldthorpe

OKRs—Helpful or Harmful?

January 20, 2022

Nidhi Singh Rathore

"I think of a journey map as a suggestion, not a rule, and I might take parts of it to fit the context and people."

Nidhi Singh Rathore Amber Davis

Embracing participation to unlock deeper truths in commercial research

March 12, 2025

Prayag Narula

"Companies have started building their own base camps, but these feel more exclusionary compared to grassroots ones."

Prayag Narula Rida Qadri

HCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer

March 28, 2023

Dan Willis

"The only time you get to build design ops at the same time as the organization structure is like in startups, but they’re so chaotic you don’t get to enjoy it."

Dan Willis

Filling the Void

November 7, 2018

Robert Fabricant

"It is okay to be vulnerable as a facilitator and to ask for co-facilitation with someone closer to the problem."

Robert Fabricant Sahibzada Mayed Nidhi Singh Rathore

Industry junctures: Paths forwards for UXR and the critical decisions that get us there [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]

October 2, 2024

Cara Maritz

"Much to my surprise, it was one of the most impactful research pieces I had produced in my career."

Cara Maritz Rachel Ny

The Art of Extrapolation

March 29, 2023

Yasmine Khan

"Even those with a roof over their head didn’t really fare much better; unexpected expenses break the budget every time."

Yasmine Khan

Checking Bias and Listening to Financially Vulnerable Americans

March 30, 2020

Peter Merholz

"I feel good about the work I do, but my company doesn't ship good work."

Peter Merholz

The 2025 State of UX/Design Organizational Health

November 12, 2025