Theme 1 Intro
Summary
In this talk, Gem reflects on the challenges faced by the knowledge and product fields amid fast-paced technological, economic, and informational upheaval. Referencing Maggie Gyllenhaal's film The Bride as a metaphor, she highlights how many find themselves in unfamiliar, overwhelming worlds not of their own making. Gem insists that professionals — including researchers, designers, and product thinkers — face a choice: adapt superficially to the noise or stand firm on their core identity as sensemakers and advocates. She emphasizes that small acts of defiance, encapsulated in the phrase 'I would prefer not to,' empower individuals to reclaim agency and clarity. Despite pressures such as the rise of AI, data overload, and organizational shifts, the core essence of this work remains: interpreting information with clarity and advocating for the people behind the data. Gem introduces fellow speakers like Dana, Kurt, Tara, Jared, and Kelly who will expand on these themes including democratization, AI’s impact, and intergenerational dialogue. Ultimately, Gem urges the audience to root themselves in their values and confidently say 'I would prefer not to' as a way to cultivate resilience and purpose in uncertain times.
Key Insights
-
•
The current knowledge ecosystem is overloaded with signals, mixing opinion with evidence, which demands sharper sensemaking skills.
-
•
Small, quiet acts of defiance like saying 'I would prefer not to' reclaim personal and professional agency.
-
•
Core identity as sensemakers and advocates remains stable even as the environment and tools evolve rapidly.
-
•
The rise of AI and technology introduces new challenges but also underscores the enduring need for human-centered advocacy.
-
•
Holistic sensemaking, integrating research, design, product, and systems thinking, is increasingly valuable amidst changing organizational roles.
-
•
Advocating for the human experience behind data is essential and perennial, not a luxury.
-
•
Facing macroeconomic and technological upheavals requires doubling down on foundational principles, not capitulating to noise.
-
•
The phrase 'I would prefer not to' symbolizes a thoughtful refusal to surrender values to external pressures.
-
•
Interdisciplinary skills position professionals to lead adaptation without abandoning core professional identity.
-
•
Community and shared dialogue, exemplified by upcoming speakers like Dana and Kurt, are key to navigating this moment.
Notable Quotes
"I would prefer not to is the kind of world many of us find ourselves in right now."
"Every time we say, I would prefer not to, we reclaim a little bit of agency."
"Defiance is not loud or theatrical; it is bravery and clarity."
"We are sensemakers. No matter what data we are given, we make sense of it."
"Advocating for human experience is not a luxury. It is essential, and it is perennial."
"Our job is to make sure the people making decisions actually listen."
"The skills we hold are exactly the skills that this moment requires."
"Anchor yourself in what you know to be right and true."
"Holistic sensemaking matters."
"I would prefer not to reduce human understanding to shallow sound bites."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Tracking complaints and fixing things immediately, even if it’s just one person, is a mark of good UX impact."
Jessamyn EdwardsSurviving Your UX Career in Enterprise Design
December 2, 2021
"We are truly in a golden age for our profession."
Doug PowellClosing Keynote: Design at Scale
November 8, 2018
"Trauma is not so much an external event as it is the way that event embeds in individual bodies."
Rachael Dietkus, LCSW Uday Gajendar Dr. Dawn Emerick Dawn E. Shedrick, LCSWLeading through the long tail of trauma
July 7, 2022
"Many customers struggle to get anyone to listen to actual insights because of the volume and complexity of raw video data."
Andy Barraclough Betsy NelsonFrom Costly Complexity to Efficient Insights: Why UX Teams Are Switching To Voxpopme
September 23, 2024
"ResearchOps came from the need to streamline these bottom of the chain foundational skills."
Dave HoraA Research Skills Evolution
March 10, 2021
"Compliance is everyone's concern but no one's responsibility."
Patrizia BertiniThe (r)evolution of designOps: It’s Time to Think (really) BIG
September 11, 2025
"Different perspectives across functions generate insights you never would have thought of on your own."
Brad Orego Ned DwyerBringing Customer Research to More Internal Teams
March 10, 2022
"Watch your language; terms like 'that's so lame' can be exclusionary or offensive."
Reginé GilbertAsking the Right Questions: Life, Hope and Moving Forward During the Pandemic
June 10, 2022
"We are open source. Our work is public. You can fork it and have the code. That’s pretty fair as taxpayers."
Russ UngerGetting Out from Under Everyone: How to Escape the Paralysis of Getting Started
June 8, 2016
