The new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research
Summary
In-person research has been squeezed for years. It’s viewed as expensive, slow, and hard to scale. As AI accelerates everything else, the temptation is to automate away human time in the field, for the sake of speed. I contend that AI’s real opportunity lies in depth, not just speed. We’re getting distracted by speed, and failing to see the potential of depth. In this talk, I argue that AI gives us the rare opportunity to restore depth to qualitative research. Instead of treating automation as a shortcut, we used AI tools to absorb labour-intensive tasks (cleaning transcripts, tagging footage, structuring notes etc) so we could reinvest that time in what remains the most data-dense method in our practice: immersive, in-person ethnography. I’ll draw on three recent consulting projects I directed: 1. In-home health research in Atlanta 2. Retail ethnography across London, Hamburg, and Milan 3. A follow-on multi-city retail study in London, Paris, Berlin, and Milan By redirecting AI-generated time savings into deeper fieldwork, we expanded ethnographic activities: from extended “deep hanging out” (to borrow Clifford Geertz’s phrase) to ethnographic journaling and collaborative interpretation moments in-field. I’ll also share how we brought non-research stakeholders into the field, and why AI was essential in making that investment possible — transforming not just insights, but internal conviction and cross-functional alignment. My goal for the audience is to come away from the talk inspired and motivated. I want people to use AI tools to help mitigate all the usual tradeoffs we as researchers have had to make over the years when conducting in-person research.
Key Insights
-
•
AI tools can significantly accelerate pre-fieldwork preparation by quickly synthesizing existing research to onboard new team members faster.
-
•
Reallocating time saved by AI from administrative tasks into more immersive, participatory in-field research enhances empathy and context.
-
•
Including more senior researchers in the field becomes possible by offloading transcript and data processing to AI, increasing research track capacity.
-
•
Dialectical analysis with AI (hypothesis testing and disproving) speeds up sense-making and yields stronger storylines.
-
•
Immersion activities informed by AI-optimized planning can deepen researcher insight by using body and emotional awareness as data.
-
•
Bringing clients into daily AI-assisted analysis sessions in the field fosters better participation, alignment, and earlier ideation.
-
•
Transparency about AI usage with clients is crucial, especially in tech sectors where AI adoption is both expected and monitored.
-
•
Rapid AI experimentation through sprints and collaboration with data science teams helps tailor AI use efficiently to research workflows.
-
•
Current AI limitations remain in highly tailored deliverables like proposals, requiring human refinement despite AI-assisted drafting.
-
•
Clients become advocates of research when engaged firsthand, which supports sustaining deep research in cost-conscious environments.
Notable Quotes
"The core thesis is that saving time with AI and reallocating it into research itself unlocks the true potential of the field."
"It often feels like research becomes beholden to exact quotes rather than the richer story that context provides, what I call the tyranny of transcripts."
"We used AI tools like NotebookLM and Gemini primarily to shortcut getting up to speed and managing transcripts, without focusing on specific tools themselves."
"Adding a senior researcher, Izzy, in field meant we could have more, smaller research tracks and better support for research newbies."
"Our AI-supported mornings were no longer about just dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s, but deeper analysis sessions including clients."
"In this context, sometimes slower is actually faster because it allows going deeper and unlocking more meaningful insights."
"For many of our tech clients, there’s a demand not just to use AI but to transparently show how and why, to respond to internal scrutiny."
"We experimented with AI-powered sprints, but had lots of dead ends and false starts before finding what really works for us."
"AI can’t yet fully replace bespoke and careful proposal building, though it helps junior researchers draft the first outlines."
"When clients join us in the field and experience research deeply, they often become advocates who come back for more."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"There’s a fine line between a service mindset and saviorism — am I helping communities or using them to feel superior?"
Frances Yllana Ann Buechner Jess Jones Betsy RamacciaD.E.A.R.R. Diaries (Discipline, Experience, Architecture, Reflection + Revolution)
November 16, 2022
"Scaling design organizations is the theme because in trying times, we need each other's support."
Bria AlexanderTheme Two Intro
September 8, 2022
"Policy like the California Privacy Rights Act requires us to explain data use and comply with user deletion requests."
Dr. Jamika D. BurgeBroad Strokes: Connecting Design, Research, and AI to the World Around Us
June 7, 2023
"You need to know your limits on how far you’re willing to exert influence and your energy investment."
Joshua GravesWe Need To Talk: Navigating Conversations with Your Boss (Part 1 of 3)
April 14, 2025
"The proof of service design’s effectiveness is now out there in the growing diversity of case studies and practitioner voices."
Lavrans Løvlie Ben ReasonAsk me anything – Authors of Service Design: From Insight to Implementation
November 19, 2025
"There’s so many ways to change team dynamics by getting closer or further from that train."
Rebecca BuckMission: Keep Talent in Research Roles!
March 10, 2021
"This is not a one-time project; adoption and mature use of principles take time and continuous refinement."
Sarah WilliamsVerizon_A Framework for CX Transformation
January 8, 2024
"No need to take notes — our scribe David Nicholson is capturing detailed session notes and insights for you."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
September 9, 2022
"Starting with positives and acknowledging good work helps break down resistance when sharing findings that reveal weak points."
Joanna Vodopivec Prabhas PokharelOne Research Team for All - Influence Without Authority
March 9, 2022
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
In what ways are synthetic users or virtual personas currently used in research practice?
What does a successful healthcare UX career look like in terms of accumulating influence and aligning with clinical/business goals?
How can power imbalances be acknowledged and shared with community members in design processes?