The new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research
Summary
In-person research has been squeezed for years. It’s viewed as expensive, slow, and hard to scale. As AI accelerates everything else, the temptation is to automate away human time in the field, for the sake of speed. I contend that AI’s real opportunity lies in depth, not just speed. We’re getting distracted by speed, and failing to see the potential of depth. In this talk, I argue that AI gives us the rare opportunity to restore depth to qualitative research. Instead of treating automation as a shortcut, we used AI tools to absorb labour-intensive tasks (cleaning transcripts, tagging footage, structuring notes etc) so we could reinvest that time in what remains the most data-dense method in our practice: immersive, in-person ethnography. I’ll draw on three recent consulting projects I directed: 1. In-home health research in Atlanta 2. Retail ethnography across London, Hamburg, and Milan 3. A follow-on multi-city retail study in London, Paris, Berlin, and Milan By redirecting AI-generated time savings into deeper fieldwork, we expanded ethnographic activities: from extended “deep hanging out” (to borrow Clifford Geertz’s phrase) to ethnographic journaling and collaborative interpretation moments in-field. I’ll also share how we brought non-research stakeholders into the field, and why AI was essential in making that investment possible — transforming not just insights, but internal conviction and cross-functional alignment. My goal for the audience is to come away from the talk inspired and motivated. I want people to use AI tools to help mitigate all the usual tradeoffs we as researchers have had to make over the years when conducting in-person research.
Key Insights
-
•
AI tools can significantly accelerate pre-fieldwork preparation by quickly synthesizing existing research to onboard new team members faster.
-
•
Reallocating time saved by AI from administrative tasks into more immersive, participatory in-field research enhances empathy and context.
-
•
Including more senior researchers in the field becomes possible by offloading transcript and data processing to AI, increasing research track capacity.
-
•
Dialectical analysis with AI (hypothesis testing and disproving) speeds up sense-making and yields stronger storylines.
-
•
Immersion activities informed by AI-optimized planning can deepen researcher insight by using body and emotional awareness as data.
-
•
Bringing clients into daily AI-assisted analysis sessions in the field fosters better participation, alignment, and earlier ideation.
-
•
Transparency about AI usage with clients is crucial, especially in tech sectors where AI adoption is both expected and monitored.
-
•
Rapid AI experimentation through sprints and collaboration with data science teams helps tailor AI use efficiently to research workflows.
-
•
Current AI limitations remain in highly tailored deliverables like proposals, requiring human refinement despite AI-assisted drafting.
-
•
Clients become advocates of research when engaged firsthand, which supports sustaining deep research in cost-conscious environments.
Notable Quotes
"The core thesis is that saving time with AI and reallocating it into research itself unlocks the true potential of the field."
"It often feels like research becomes beholden to exact quotes rather than the richer story that context provides, what I call the tyranny of transcripts."
"We used AI tools like NotebookLM and Gemini primarily to shortcut getting up to speed and managing transcripts, without focusing on specific tools themselves."
"Adding a senior researcher, Izzy, in field meant we could have more, smaller research tracks and better support for research newbies."
"Our AI-supported mornings were no longer about just dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s, but deeper analysis sessions including clients."
"In this context, sometimes slower is actually faster because it allows going deeper and unlocking more meaningful insights."
"For many of our tech clients, there’s a demand not just to use AI but to transparently show how and why, to respond to internal scrutiny."
"We experimented with AI-powered sprints, but had lots of dead ends and false starts before finding what really works for us."
"AI can’t yet fully replace bespoke and careful proposal building, though it helps junior researchers draft the first outlines."
"When clients join us in the field and experience research deeply, they often become advocates who come back for more."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If you said are you creative, I’m gonna say hell yeah."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"Any service is a configuration of enterprise elements, reshaping and enabling the enterprise to deliver that service."
Milan Guenther Benjamin KumpfThe $212 billion ‘so what?’: unlocking impact in development cooperation
November 20, 2025
"Research repositories aren’t single sources of truth anymore; data and insights live in hundreds of different apps across companies."
Ben Davies Matt Duignan Andrew Michael Dr. Emily DiLeoExpert Panel: The Principles of Research Repository Design
March 11, 2022
"People plus practices plus places equals artifacts."
Phil GilbertA Consistent Culture of Design
May 14, 2015
"Building more ethical, responsible, and humanistic forms of technologies requires diverse and interdisciplinary conversations."
Prayag Narula Rida QadriHCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer
March 28, 2023
"Non-researchers running their own research can produce mediocre results if they lack operational support and guidance."
Ned Dwyer Emily Stewart James WallisThe Intersection of Design and ResearchOps
September 24, 2024
"An accessible product is not only the right thing to do, it’s also good for business."
Erin WeigelReal-world lessons to improve your conversion rates
June 26, 2024
"Disability is less about a person and more about a person’s interaction with the environment and processes."
Samuel ProulxFrom Standards to Innovation: Why Inclusive Design Wins
November 19, 2025
"If 71% of people self-identify as gamers, why aren’t you learning from the video game industry?"
Cheryl PlatzEmbrace Your Fun Factor: Game Development Best Practices for Product Design
January 9, 2026
