Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Summary
What's one thing that prevents our designs from truly serving and uplifting as many users as possible? Implicit bias. While design has the power to drive positive change in the world, it's much more likely to uphold oppressive systems (such as racism, ableism, sexism and classism). This leads to harmful and exclusionary user experiences that fail to deliver on design's promises of usability, delight, relevance and accessibility. In this session, Sandra explores how implicit bias shows up in our designs by examining real-world examples across various design disciplines, including graphic design, UX, service design and product design. She then reviews practical techniques you can apply to start to root out bias from your designs, including: Evaluating designs for patterns of implicit bias (such as racial bias, gender bias, language bias and beyond) Interrogating the root causes of these biases across the design process Addressing bias both preventively (before it happens) and reactively (after it happens)
Key Insights
-
•
Implicit bias often manifests as non-neutral or dominant defaults, privileging certain identity groups unconsciously in design.
-
•
Systemic bias is embedded in institutional procedures and practices, reflecting broader power structures beyond individual prejudices.
-
•
Technology, such as algorithms and facial recognition, can reproduce and amplify racial and gender bias with serious real-world consequences.
-
•
Design solutions focused only on surface changes miss deeper cultural norms and beliefs that sustain inequality.
-
•
Inclusive design requires questioning who the 'default user' is and broadening personas to include marginalized groups.
-
•
Accountability involves recognizing the gap between designers’ intentions and the actual impacts of their work on exclusion and harm.
-
•
Intersectionality is key to understanding overlapping social identities and how they affect privilege and oppression within design.
-
•
Design artifacts like user journeys, personas, and feature prioritization embed systemic biases and need reflexive examination.
-
•
Socioeconomic bias in design shows up in assumptions about internet quality, device types, and user accessibility globally.
-
•
Small actions toward inclusivity must be coupled with organizational culture changes addressing incentives and power dynamics.
Notable Quotes
"If you’re in tech, you are in social change, whether you realize it or not."
"Bias is a tendency, feeling or opinion for or against something without reason or evidence."
"The Twitter algorithm favored lighter skin tones when cropping images, reflecting racial bias in tech."
"White supremacy is the belief system of the superiority of whiteness that can embed itself in algorithms."
"Designing for the dominant default ignores people whose identities are marginalized or excluded."
"We can’t solve systemic problems with surface-level solutions or checklists."
"The Reflexive Compass helps us discern bias patterns early, take accountability, and measure impact."
"There’s a gap between intentions and impact; humility is needed to close it."
"Many smartwatch designs assume male hands as default, excluding smaller wrists and diverse body types."
"Cisgender binary options in onboarding flows exclude non-binary and gender-expansive identities."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"You need well-defined frameworks and guardrails for experimentation success to prevent chaos across teams."
Jemma Ahmed Steve Carrod Chris Geison Dr. Shadi Janansefat Christopher NashDemocratization: Working with it, not against it [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
July 24, 2024
"The work of the design system is constant change management, raising awareness, and fostering common language."
Nina JurcicThe Design System Rollercoaster: From Enabler and Bottleneck to Catalyst for Change
October 3, 2023
"Design principles are guiding tools for conversation rather than strict rules with objective scores."
Nathan Curtis Nalini P. Kotamraju Jack Moffett Dawn ResselDiscussion
June 9, 2016
"When tactical metrics end up on the left side and KPIs on the right side of the compass, that signals we need a longer conversation about what we measure."
Saara Kamppari-Miller Nicole Bergstrom Shashi JainKey Metrics: Comparing Three Letter Acronym Metrics That Include the Word “Key”
November 13, 2024
"The sum of parts is not always the whole — we lost sight of the mental model in our employee record feature."
Malini RaoLessons Learned from a 4-year Product Re-platforming Journey
June 9, 2021
"Over 4,000 users volunteered to look at the beta version, giving us excellent data at scale."
Mackenzie Cockram Sara Branco Cunha Ian FranklinIntegrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research from Discovery to Live
December 16, 2022
"Even virtually, we are a community obligated to treat each other with kindness and respect."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
June 9, 2021
"Many product teams have never come face to face with their revenue numbers before."
Jackie HoLead Effectively While Preserving Team Autonomy with Growth Boards
January 8, 2024
"Soft eyes means zooming between the particular tree and the whole forest to see the bigger picture."
Dan HillDesigning for the infrastructures of everyday life
June 4, 2024