Rosenverse
Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment

Gold
Tuesday, March 28, 2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Share the love for this talk
Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment
Speakers: Kristen Guth, Ph.D.
Link:

Summary

Product teams, including those I work with, struggle to overcome the grinding momentum of product delivery timelines to make room for adequate discovery, learning, and application through research. The game of product development becomes fiercer when it's not the first time, but the fourth team assembled to tackle a complex product space. In well-trod territory, strong opinions may abound, and talking past each other and rehashing approaches is rampant. Challenges that face researchers as partners in product development include establishing a sense of shared team vision, separating facts from fiction, and moving the team past hang-ups to establish a research strategy and product direction. This case introduces the idea of "grinding momentum" and outlines a stakeholder engagement process known as a FOG session that helps all team members across functional expertise areas claim voice, hear others, and share in collective aha moments that define next steps. Using a mixed-methods approach, a process is outlined to frameshift the value of existing knowledge spanning many departments within an organization, bring together distinct expertise vocabularies and analyses, and propel product partners to identify true knowledge gaps.

Key Insights

  • Research is often perceived as slow but actually enables faster product velocity by clarifying decisions.

  • Daniel Kahneman’s System 1 (intuitive) and System 2 (analytical) thinking both complement each other in decision-making.

  • Expert intuition requires regularity, practice, and immediate feedback to be reliable, conditions rarely met in novel product contexts.

  • Organizations mature in information processing by adding departments: starting with intuition (product teams), then data, and finally research teams for deeper analysis.

  • Product teams often over-rely on intuitive thinking, leading to overconfidence and misalignment.

  • Grinding momentum is a shared team pressure to move fast without adequate foundational knowledge, risking poor decisions.

  • The FOG method (Facts, Opinions, Guesses) helps teams slow down, separate evidence from assumptions, and surface knowledge gaps.

  • Facilitated FOG sessions enable democratic participation, uncover tensions, and establish shared mental models for product direction.

  • Research should be positioned as a partner in knowledge creation rather than an arbiter of absolute truth, shifting power dynamics.

  • Dealing with bad data or assumed facts requires active researcher intervention to analyze artifacts and reframe discussions constructively.

Notable Quotes

"Slowing down with research can help us move faster overall."

"Intuition is knowing without knowing how you know, I just know it."

"Expert intuition can be right or wrong because it relies on cues and heuristics in uncertain contexts."

"Research is the most analytical form of information processing because it involves active knowledge generation."

"Most product decisions look intuitive, but intuition alone leads to coherent stories that can be wrong."

"Research is sometimes perceived as intuitive and therefore dismissed as insufficient for decision-making."

"Grinding momentum is a shared mental model that pushes teams to decide quickly without shared foundational knowledge."

"The FOG method helps teams separate facts from fiction and move past hangups toward alignment."

"The goal is to turn research into a partner in shared discovery, not just an arbiter of truth."

"If a stakeholder claims something is a fact without evidence, it is our responsibility as researchers to challenge and unpack that."

Ask the Rosenbot
Florence Okoye
AfroFuturism and UX Research
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Brendan Jarvis
Framing Tomorrow by Questioning Today
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Aiyana Bodi
Three Key Climate Initiatives and How You Can Help
2024 • Climate UX Interest Group
Emily DiLeo
Stronger Together: Lessons Learned from UX Research Ops
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Steve Chaparro
Bringing Into Alignment Brand, Culture and Space
2020 • DesignOps Community
Jon Fukuda
Design Planning and Management Support
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Briana Thomas
The Quiet Force: Uncovering Hidden Leadership in High-Impact Design Teams
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Elizabeth Churchill
Exploring Cadence: You, Your Team, and Your Enterprise
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Michaela Mora
Advanced Concept Testing Approaches To Guide Product Development and Business Decisions
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold
Jim Kalbach
Jazz Improvisation as a Model for Team Collaboration
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Louis Rosenfeld
GenAI for UXers: A Rosenbot Demo and Discussion
2025 • DesignOps Summit 2025
Gold
Emily Danielson
“I mean, I can lift a shovel”: Design Skills in Disaster Response
2022 • Design at Scale 2022
Gold
Kristin Skinner
Group Activity: A Deep Dive Into Value and Outcomes
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Mujtaba Hameed
The new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research
2026 • Advancing Research 2026
Gold
Andrea Gallagher
The Problem Space
2019 • Advancing Research Community
Michele Wong
Helping Them Help Us
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold

More Videos

Anna Avrekh

"Being human, authentic, humble, and showing vulnerability can take you a long way as a research leader."

Anna Avrekh Dr. John Pagonis Klara Pelcl Sina Schreiber

Expert Panel: Leading in and with Research

March 10, 2022

Taylor Klassman

"Sometimes we have to do a bait and switch—meet organizational demands but turn that into opportunities to learn."

Taylor Klassman

Shaping the Next Era of UX Research: Collaborative Forum

March 11, 2025

Dr. Jamika D. Burge

"The pandemic is a message from the universe to pause and rethink who we hire and how we train."

Dr. Jamika D. Burge Steve Portigal Alba Villamil Sam Ladner

The Future of Research: Bridging the Gaps

July 29, 2021

Marisa Bernstein

"No surprises. Tell participants everything they’ll be experiencing from who will be in the room to if the session will be recorded."

Marisa Bernstein

It Takes GRIT: Lessons from the Small, but Mighty World of Civic Usability Testing

December 9, 2021

Dan Mall

"A lot of people think about design systems as a project, but they’re really about how an organization gets work done."

Dan Mall

“Ask Me Anything” with Dan Mall, Author of Upcoming Rosenfeld Title, Design that Scales

October 2, 2023

Chris Geison

"What am I personally doing to contribute to the dynamics that stand in the way of better futures?"

Chris Geison

Theme 1 Intro

March 9, 2022

Bruce Gillespie

"Weave in great user stories that exemplify your key points to maximize engagement."

Bruce Gillespie

Learning from journalism: Balancing impactful communication with compassionate storytelling

March 13, 2025

Nancy Douyon

"We all want to design for scale, but empathy alone is sometimes a shortcoming when thinking about scale."

Nancy Douyon

We'll Figure That Out in the Next Launch: Enterprise Tech's Nobility Complex

June 15, 2018

Liz Ebengo

"There’s never really conflicting futures—everyone wants to take care of the most vulnerable children; you just have to find the bridge between visions."

Liz Ebengo

The Burden on Children: The Cost of Insufficient Post-Conflict Services and Pathways Forward

December 4, 2024