Tiny team, moonshot impact: Democratizing research across continents
Summary
How does a team of 2.5 researchers support an organisation of 500-1,000 people? And what happens if we give away the last bits of power we have by exposing our craft? Welcome to ResearchOps 2.0. We’ve stopped debating democratisation (that’s so 2022) and started enabling it: tooling, coaching, and confidence at scale. We moved democratisation from theory to practice and extended our reach. Continuous enablement for teams close to us, plus Innovation Hubs twice-a-year events where teams from across disciplines and continents run their first real studies. These hubs connect us with people we’d never normally meet and unlock research at a scale that once felt impossible. With support from our Digital Experience team and VP, we equipped colleagues from ~10 diverse teams to do research—ethically and effectively. The outcome? In one quarter: - 500 interviews - 250 unmoderated tests - 1,700 survey responses Many led by first-time moderators from product, design, and business. This isn’t about replacing researchers. It’s about building a research culture so strong that everyone wants in and says, “Research is cool.”
Key Insights
-
•
A tiny research team can multiply their impact by enabling non-researchers to conduct customer research with proper coaching and guardrails.
-
•
Embedding generative research within existing large B2B conferences leverages customer volume and interest difficult to achieve through traditional recruitment.
-
•
In-person research builds stronger customer empathy and rapport than artifacts or remote methods alone.
-
•
Co-creation with customers leads to more actionable insights and greater engagement, especially in technical, regulated industries like aerospace.
-
•
Shifting research from execution to strategic advising requires moving from fulfilling requests to framing problems and guiding direction.
-
•
Quality is protected through coaching not caretaking, commitment enforcement, thorough rehearsals, and centralizing legal and consent responsibilities.
-
•
The Innovation Hub built a coalition of 30 research advocates across diverse disciplines within a year, increasing customer fluency organization-wide.
-
•
Despite progress, the appetite for tactical research remains stronger than for strategic, long-term projects, highlighting ongoing cultural challenges.
-
•
Providing opportunities for peer exchange among research participants increases ongoing engagement and capability retention.
-
•
Democratization must be actively designed and owned by research teams, embracing a system designer mindset rather than a victim mindset.
Notable Quotes
"The debate about democratization is over. The question now is how do we make the most out of it."
"We could either become an internal service desk that's always at capacity or find a lever that multiplies our impact."
"Customer voice lives in minds, not in artifacts. We want people to truly hear how customers think and what they value."
"Co-creation is highly actionable for teams and genuinely engaging for customers."
"We do research not just to generate insights but to embed empathy across the organization."
"Scale without guardrails becomes chaos. Coaching not caretaking protects learning and accountability."
"The role of research is shifting from making to advising, from executing studies to shaping problem framing."
"Teams openly said they didn’t know how to ask questions before and discovered research is cool afterwards."
"We built a coalition of about 30 research advocates in a single year. That’s powerful."
"Democratization was never something that happened to research. It was something I chose to design to make work for my team."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Language is critical to shared understanding and shared context."
Husani OakleyTheme Two Intro
June 6, 2023
"Our methodologies today are prone to producing one-size-fits-men outcomes under the guise of being gender-neutral."
Mansi GuptaDrawing from Feminist Practice to Make Inclusive Design Operational
September 9, 2022
"When you press a button like an upvote, it’s the developer’s job to make sure the visual state is communicated via ARIA landmarks."
Sam ProulxDesigning For Screen Readers: Understanding the Mental Models and Techniques of Real Users
December 10, 2021
"Data is just single points; information is making that data meaningful through context."
Sarah CoyleDesign and Analytics with Sarah Coyle
July 30, 2020
"We launched the Benefits Hub in just a few days during a hackathon at the start of the pandemic."
Alan Williams Rose DeebDesigning essential financial services for those in need
February 10, 2022
"A centralized model for design systems can be problematic because it distances the team from end users."
Dan DonaldDesign Systems as a Vehicle for Systemic Change
June 1, 2023
"We have a responsibility to help heal communities and build trust so we can do design with intention."
Samuel MartinCo-Design vs Faux-Design: Navigating the Complexities of Sharing Power in Co-Design
March 27, 2026
"We reduced the time to approve consent forms from two weeks to minutes through modular content and legal collaboration."
Phil HeskethDesigning Accessible Research Workflows
September 29, 2021
"Data problems often end up being people problems because we're lazy, shortsighted, territorial creatures."
David ConradThe Feeling of Data
September 14, 2023
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
What role do templates play in structuring research reports for better repository management and AI parsing?
What benefits come from integrating apprenticeship or internship models into design education?
Why is prior authorization such a persistent problem and how can patient-centered solutions be designed around it?