When Thought-worlds Collide: Collaborating Between Research and Practice
Summary
When ‘thought worlds’ collide, what can we do to better understand and support each other? This talk answers the question by taking a closer look at the differences and similarities between research and practice, and offering lessons learned about communication and collaboration within diverse product teams made up of a mix of academic and professional disciplines.
Key Insights
-
•
The research-practice gap exists not just between academia and industry but also among different research layers like academic, applied, and design research.
-
•
Academics focus on advancing knowledge often without immediate practical impact, while industry prioritizes delivering value quickly and actionably.
-
•
Researchers and practitioners frequently fail to engage or communicate on platforms like Twitter, contributing to mutual isolation.
-
•
Translating complex academic findings into accessible, actionable language significantly improves their usability for designers.
-
•
The timing of delivering research resources is crucial; designers seek different information at different phases of the design process.
-
•
Combining research dissemination with marketing strategies and knowing your audience increases the effectiveness of communication.
-
•
Interdisciplinary teams benefit from starting conversations with personal introductions and goals before diving into business discussions.
-
•
Conflict in teams is inevitable but manageable by steering it into constructive debate and fostering psychological safety.
-
•
Self-awareness about how one debates and communicates disagreement improves team dynamics and outcomes.
-
•
Personal identity and relationships deeply influence how one navigates and bridges gaps between different professional and cultural worlds.
Notable Quotes
"My talk is about being misunderstood and navigating an identity crisis."
"What exactly did you observe that makes you say that? What past experience let you think that way?"
"The research-practice gap frustrates me, and I try to bridge it when it makes sense to."
"Science doesn’t just check truth; it has to win hearts and minds."
"Design has to be fast, accessible, actionable, and intuitive, whereas science is often slow and hard to act on."
"If you want to prove someone wrong, you’re actually not seeing the person in front of you."
"Teams with different thought worlds should start with who they are, what their roles are, and their passions inside and outside work."
"Strong teams are self-aware of how they communicate disagreement and interpret others."
"It’s our job to see the person in front of us, and if that means having an uncomfortable conversation, have that conversation."
"As you touch a human soul, be just another human soul."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We stuck with NPS because it was a pure metric with a long history we could trend, instead of muddying things with loyalty or revenue."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"The system always kicks back—the consequences of our actions unfold over time."
Peter MorvilleThe Architecture of Understanding
May 13, 2015
"I was able to connect the dots a lot for the UX team because I had those relationships from customer success."
Renee ReidBecoming a ResearchH.E.R (Highly Enterprise Ready)
June 3, 2019
"Look at your old data again with a new lens; reanalyzing can save money and be less extractive."
Dane DeSutterKeeping the Body in Mind: What Gestures and Embodied Actions Tell You That Users May Not
March 26, 2024
"A good two-factor system offers multiple methods, like authenticator apps, calls, and texts, with generous timeouts."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
October 3, 2023
"Three quarters of users who fail their mission don’t come back, risking lost revenue and market share."
Andrew Custage Michael MallettThe Digital Journey: Research on Consumer Frustration and Loyalty
March 29, 2023
"You can’t have a hackathon without free food."
Shelby SwitzerMaking Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World
December 10, 2021
"Right now, there’s a fear of being replaced by AI, and while a lot of that’s overblown, researchers have a legitimate reason to feel uncomfortable."
Llewyn PaineCoexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
March 11, 2025
"Sensemaking is your superpower as a researcher to amplify your impact beyond user experience mechanics."
Robin BeersNavigating organizational systems: Rethinking researcher’s role in driving change
March 13, 2025
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
In what ways are synthetic users or virtual personas currently used in research practice?
What design strategies can support community-led rebuilding of maternal healthcare in rural maternity care deserts?
What are the financial barriers preventing birth centers from operating sustainably in rural areas?