When Thought-worlds Collide: Collaborating Between Research and Practice
Summary
More and more researchers with no business or product backgrounds are in product research. In the day-to-day industry practice, we are called to march towards the same goal despite our different ways of knowing, talking, and past experiences. Failing to do so could lead to missing opportunities for innovation, reinventing the wheels, and building products that may pose risks to society. When ‘thought worlds’ collide, what can we do to better understand and support each other? This talk answers the question by taking a closer look at the differences and similarities between research and practice, and offering lessons learned about communication and collaboration within diverse product teams made up of a mix of academic and professional disciplines.
Key Insights
-
•
The research-practice gap exists not just between academia and industry but also among different research layers like academic, applied, and design research.
-
•
Academics focus on advancing knowledge often without immediate practical impact, while industry prioritizes delivering value quickly and actionably.
-
•
Researchers and practitioners frequently fail to engage or communicate on platforms like Twitter, contributing to mutual isolation.
-
•
Translating complex academic findings into accessible, actionable language significantly improves their usability for designers.
-
•
The timing of delivering research resources is crucial; designers seek different information at different phases of the design process.
-
•
Combining research dissemination with marketing strategies and knowing your audience increases the effectiveness of communication.
-
•
Interdisciplinary teams benefit from starting conversations with personal introductions and goals before diving into business discussions.
-
•
Conflict in teams is inevitable but manageable by steering it into constructive debate and fostering psychological safety.
-
•
Self-awareness about how one debates and communicates disagreement improves team dynamics and outcomes.
-
•
Personal identity and relationships deeply influence how one navigates and bridges gaps between different professional and cultural worlds.
Notable Quotes
"My talk is about being misunderstood and navigating an identity crisis."
"What exactly did you observe that makes you say that? What past experience let you think that way?"
"The research-practice gap frustrates me, and I try to bridge it when it makes sense to."
"Science doesn’t just check truth; it has to win hearts and minds."
"Design has to be fast, accessible, actionable, and intuitive, whereas science is often slow and hard to act on."
"If you want to prove someone wrong, you’re actually not seeing the person in front of you."
"Teams with different thought worlds should start with who they are, what their roles are, and their passions inside and outside work."
"Strong teams are self-aware of how they communicate disagreement and interpret others."
"It’s our job to see the person in front of us, and if that means having an uncomfortable conversation, have that conversation."
"As you touch a human soul, be just another human soul."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Good problem statements begin with aspirational mindsets and use backcasting to envision preferred futures."
Surya VankaUnleashing Swarm Creativity to Solve Enterprise Challenges
June 10, 2021
"Most people joined us with tactical asks but the conversations became strategic."
Patrick Boehler Madison KarasThe service shift: transforming media organizations to create real value through design
November 19, 2025
"Leadership buy-in now means we get to focus on bigger, generative research questions instead of just tactical usability studies."
Andreas Huebner Amy Takata Craig BrookesWhat Is It Like To Be Part of The UX Team at Compass?
March 11, 2021
"Solving one task in the design process can generate issues or benefits in different teams."
Patrizia Bertini Alexandra Mengoni LeónPushing DesignOps’ Influence into New Global Markets
September 9, 2022
"We’re showing people how to collaborate like crazy and how to fail gracefully."
Phil GilbertA Consistent Culture of Design
May 14, 2015
"This is a hero moment because it accelerates and simplifies exploration of clustering options."
Yulya Besplemennova[Demo] Stress-testing GenAI in user research synthesis
June 4, 2024
"Observers interrupting sessions was a weird behavior we had to manage with clear rules."
Sarah RinkRemote User Research: Dos and Don'ts from the Virtual Field
June 11, 2020
"We used AI tools like NotebookLM and Gemini primarily to shortcut getting up to speed and managing transcripts, without focusing on specific tools themselves."
Mujtaba HameedThe new horizon of ethnography: using AI to unlock the full potential of in-person research
March 11, 2026
"One of the challenges for designers is to orient around forces rather than only people."
Sheryl CababaLiving in the Clouds: Adopting a Systems Thinking Mindset
June 6, 2023
