Summary
More and more researchers with no business or product backgrounds are in product research. In the day-to-day industry practice, we are called to march towards the same goal despite our different ways of knowing, talking, and past experiences. Failing to do so could lead to missing opportunities for innovation, reinventing the wheels, and building products that may pose risks to society. When ‘thought worlds’ collide, what can we do to better understand and support each other? This talk answers the question by taking a closer look at the differences and similarities between research and practice, and offering lessons learned about communication and collaboration within diverse product teams made up of a mix of academic and professional disciplines.
Key Insights
-
•
The research practice gap reflects mismatched expectations and communication styles between academia and industry that hinder impact.
-
•
Academic research values truth and self-criticism, whereas industry research prioritizes speed, actionability, and user value.
-
•
Different research 'thought worlds' (psychology, design, HCI) define research differently, complicating collaboration.
-
•
Research outputs in academia and industry share structural similarities, such as problem framing, methods, insights, and implications.
-
•
Trust and attention barriers often prevent research findings from influencing practitioners effectively.
-
•
Translating dense academic findings into concise, jargon-free, visual, and actionable formats greatly improves usability.
-
•
Timing research delivery to match designers’ work phases increases likelihood of uptake.
-
•
Teams with diverse backgrounds must accept conflict as normal and navigate it towards constructive debate.
-
•
Successful collaboration requires people-first empathy and self-awareness about how disagreements are communicated.
-
•
Empathy, patience, and seeing others fully beyond labels or roles are fundamental for bridging gaps across identities and disciplines.
Notable Quotes
"All my work, especially coming from CEOs, I felt deeply defeated by that comment."
"The research practice gap is frustrating, and I try to bridge it when it makes sense to."
"Design is fast, accessible, actionable, intuitive; science is slow, dense, behind paywalls, and self-critical."
"Practitioners, researchers, and hybrids don’t really hang out on Twitter; few translators exist between these worlds."
"Science is not pure and naive; advancing research is a matter of chance, strategy, and marketing too."
"To better collaborate is to tackle barriers around user researcher and the people we’re trying to inspire, often trust and attention."
"If you just want to prove someone wrong then you’re actually not seeing that person in front of you."
"Teams with different thought worlds should start by sharing what their roles are, goals, and passions in and outside work."
"Conflict is the norm in interdisciplinary teams and should be steered into debate rather than personal undermining."
"As you touch a human soul, be just another human soul."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"In some organizations, UX Architects at the program level work with product managers to validate hypotheses and set design direction before PI planning."
Jack MoffettSAFe or Sorry? (Videoconference)
May 29, 2019
"We have a thing at Athena about positive mutual regard — sitting down with people to understand root causes for strange behaviors builds powerful bonds."
Tricia WangSCALE: Discussion
June 15, 2018
"Sometimes fixing tax systems by leveraging existing data completely removes user burden and errors."
Fredrik MathesonFirst-time users, longtime strategies: Why Parkinson’s Law is making you less effective at work – and how to design a fix.
June 8, 2016
"Early career employees should express gratitude and appreciation for those who offer help as part of compassion."
Laine Riley ProkayHow DesignOps can Drive Inclusive Career Ladders for All
September 30, 2021
"UserVoice let us merge similar requests internally, which was crucial before automation."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"Research is both analytical and intuitive but often perceived only as intuitive, which risks it being dismissed."
Kristen Guth, Ph.D.Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment
March 28, 2023
"Without diverse perspectives at senior levels, we have a myopic view and limit the potential of our insights."
Joi FreemanA New Vantage Point: Building a Pipeline for Multifaceted Research(ers)
March 30, 2020
"Design is not a phase, it’s an ongoing conversation with the users."
Victor UdoewaTheme One Intro
March 27, 2023
"You need the courage to say no: I’m not going to spread my team so thin that we cannot deliver quality."
Peter MerholzCustomer-Centered Design Organizations
June 8, 2017