Rosenverse

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

AI in Real Life: Using LLMs to Turbocharge Microsoft Learn

Thursday, February 13, 2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
AI in Real Life: Using LLMs to Turbocharge Microsoft Learn
Speakers: Sarah Barrett
Link:

Summary

Enthusiasm for AI tools, especially large language models like ChatGPT, is everywhere, but what does it actually look like to deliver large-scale user-facing experiences using these tools in a production environment? Clearly they're powerful, but what do they need to make them work reliably and at scale? In this session, Sarah provides a perspective on some of the information architecture and user experience infrastructure organizations need to effectively leverage AI. She also shares three AI experiences currently live on Microsoft Learn: An interactive assistant that helps users post high-quality questions to a community forum A tool that dynamically creates learning plans based on goals the user shares A training assistant that clarifies, defines, and guides learners while they study Through lessons learned from shipping these experiences over the last two years, UXers, IAs, and PMs will come away with a better sense of what they might need to make these hyped-up technologies work in real life.

Key Insights

  • Most AI applications no longer require building foundation models from scratch; the focus is now on application development and integration.

  • Single, all-purpose chatbots (everything chatbots) are insufficient because they handle high ambiguity and diverse, often complex tasks poorly.

  • Sarah introduces the ambiguity footprint as a framework to measure AI application complexity and risks across several axes such as task complexity, context, interface, prompt openness, and sensitivity.

  • AI features that support simple, complimentary user tasks, rather than critical or complex ones, are easier and safer to build and scale.

  • Visible AI interfaces, like chatbots, set clearer user expectations but introduce more ambiguity and management overhead compared to invisible AI (e.g., keyboard optimizations).

  • Prompt engineering plays a crucial role in defining the boundaries of AI output, from very open-ended to highly restricted scopes.

  • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) helps manage up-to-date context by dynamically querying relevant data chunks rather than using static corpus.

  • Evaluating AI outputs rigorously is essential but often underprioritized; without clear quality metrics, teams end up relying on subjective or anecdotal assessments.

  • Data ethics and distributed AI implementations can create blind spots, limiting feedback loops necessary for continuous AI model improvement.

  • Incrementally building AI applications with smaller ambiguity footprints helps organizations develop expertise and controls before tackling more complex, open-ended AI products.

Notable Quotes

"You’re not doing IA, but you’re always doing it."

"An everything chat bot is almost certainly not how you’re going to build it; realistically you’re building three apps in a trench coat."

"AI is ambiguous at best because we’re fully in the realm of probabilistic rather than deterministic programming."

"The more complex the task, the less likely it is to be successful with current AI."

"A task where AI adds a little something is honestly easier to get right than one where it’s absolutely critical."

"Visible AI interfaces introduce another place where you can add ambiguity."

"Retrieval Augmented Generation lets you supply specific relevant information to the model dynamically rather than everything at once."

"Evaluation might be the most important part of your entire development effort and is often the hardest to do well."

"You can’t just eyeball results and call it good; AI applications are expensive and complex and require systematic evaluation."

"Never build or buy an everything chat bot again; start with less ambiguous, targeted AI experiences."

Ask the Rosenbot
Dave Gray
Liminal Thinking: Sense-making for systems in large organizations
2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Gold
Peter Levin
Solve a Problem Here, Transform a Strategy There: Research as an Occasion for Expanding Organizational Possibility
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Melinda Belcher
Bridging the Gap: Making the Most of the Differences Between Agency and Enterprise
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Erin Hauber
Design is Not the Frosting on the Scaled Agile Layer Cake
2019 • DesignOps Summit 2019
Gold
Jen Cardello
Curating insight: Strategies for integrating knowledge across research functions
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Joshua Graves
We Need To Talk: Navigating Conversations with Your Boss (Part 1 of 3)
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
April Reagan
Look, Think, Act: The Futures-Smart Design Organization
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Candace Myers
Standardizing Design at Scale
2022 • DesignOps Summit 2022
Gold
Angelos Arnis
Navigating the Rapid Shifts in Tech's Turbulent Terrain
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Amy Gawronski Zuccaro
Advice for DesignOps Employee #1
2021 • DesignOps Summit 2021
Gold
Jackie Ajoux
Leveling-Up: A Single-Player’s Guide to the DesignOps Team-of-One
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Bilan Hashi
The Tension Between Story Collecting and Story Telling in Research
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Lisa Welchman
Cleaning Up Our Mess: Digital Governance for Designers
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Mandy Drew
What Role(s) Can Research Play in Responsible Design?
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Llewyn Paine
Coexisting with AI: A practical guide for researchers to navigate tools, ethics, and integration
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold
Sarah Fathallah
Beyond insights: Rethinking the role of researchers as stewards of organizational wisdom
2025 • Advancing Research 2025
Gold

More Videos

Taylor Jennings

"If we wanted to scale and continue to grow, we were going to need something to help us."

Taylor Jennings Joe Nelson Alex Knoll

Repository Retrospective: Learnings from Introducing a Central Place for UX Research

March 9, 2022

Nicole Aleong

"Expectation describes how things ought to be and reinforces the distinction between the present and what is not yet here."

Nicole Aleong

Future Orientations to Everyday Life: Futures Anthropology as a Methodology

March 26, 2024

Jeff Gothelf

"The innovation studio bakes in strategic vision, leadership, funding, and ownership."

Jeff Gothelf

Innovation Studios: the Engines of Enterprise Experimentation

May 14, 2015

Saara Kamppari-Miller

"By designing products through the lens of edge cases like disabilities first, they often become better products for everyone."

Saara Kamppari-Miller

DesignOps for Inclusive Design and Accessibility

May 26, 2022

Tess Dixon

"There’s a lot of pressure on ops people and managers to make everything perfect all the time for staff."

Tess Dixon

C'mon Get Happy

September 29, 2021

Liam Thurston

"Soft skills often are a multiplier on your hard skills—they’re just as valuable, if not more so."

Liam Thurston

Why Your Design Team Is Quitting, And How To Fix It

June 10, 2022

Ian Swinson

"Communication matters—sending an email to an executive with spelling mistakes can ruin your respect."

Ian Swinson

Designing and Driving UX Careers

June 8, 2016

Leisa Reichelt

"Ratios always start on the premise of spreading people too thin, which is not a great way to get success."

Leisa Reichelt

Opening Keynote: Operating in Context

November 7, 2018

Rachael Greene

"Without a design ops function, teams make their own flavors that dilute brand and accessibility."

Rachael Greene Alison Davis

Building a Design Ops Practice that Really Works (Most of the Time)

October 2, 2025