Innovating With People: Unleashing the Potential of Civic Design
Summary
In his opening keynote, Christian Bason, CEO, Danish Design Centre, will share insights from his nearly two decades of work with civic design as an approach to human-centred innovation and sustainable change. Based on his experience from running MindLab, the Danish government’s innovation team, as well as academic research and hands-on design projects with public organisations, Christian will assess the past and present of civic design. He will suggest that while it may seem there is a clash between the empathy, creativity and formgiving in design versus the objectivity, analytics and rationality of bureaucracy, they can be reconciled. The world needs both stability and change, and civic designers who can embrace both perspectives have the potential of transforming how we run government to the benefit of people, society and the planet. Christian will end his presentation by proposing some future directions for civic design that can unleash its full potential in the years to come.
Key Insights
-
•
Civic design is not about managing change but discovering what change is needed through empathy and human-centered research.
-
•
Embedding design studios within government ministries enables strategic partnership and long-term innovation beyond isolated projects.
-
•
Despite bureaucracy’s persistence, empathy and design-driven approaches can and must coexist within public institutions.
-
•
Civic design successfully applies across diverse sectors including health, social services, digital government, justice, immigration, and economic development.
-
•
Prototyping and iterative testing enable rapid learning and reduce risks in public sector innovation despite complex stakeholder environments.
-
•
Sustained use of civic design by public managers over 10 years proves its value and lasting impact on policy and service outcomes.
-
•
A key challenge is scaling human-centered culture across entire organizations rather than confining design to specialized teams or labs.
-
•
Future civic design must focus on systemic, mission-oriented challenges addressing cross-sector and multi-level problems.
-
•
Ethics, inclusion, and digital responsibility (for example using a digital ethics compass) are critical in shaping trustworthy technology in public services.
-
•
Next-generation civic organizations should move beyond hierarchy to self-management, trust, and role-based task definitions to fully unleash human creativity.
Notable Quotes
"Civic design is challenging because it’s about discovering what kind of changes are needed, not just managing change."
"It’s a fake contradiction to say empathy and bureaucracy cannot coexist; we need bureaucracy to have empathy."
"Design makes the abstract tangible by transforming concepts into something with form, shape, and expression."
"Embedding creativity, innovation, and design methodologies in the heart of government is a compelling journey many governments are on."
"We must not build procedures and policies before we really need them, and define tasks not by hierarchy but by roles."
"After 10 years, managers who first encountered civic design still believe it’s the right approach and continue to use it."
"Civic design lets us nuance the full range of citizens’ behavior, which often isn’t purely rational."
"We can prototype policies by imagining a citizen’s daily life if a policy is realized, despite political and time constraints."
"The future of civic design is systemic, mission-driven, ethical, inclusive, and regenerative, considering all living things."
"We have to create human-centered organizations where people thrive by trust and recognition, grow with influence, and want to make a difference."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Knowing your teammates personally helps in remote settings, especially for encouraging shy or quiet engineers to engage."
Iain McMaster IHan ChengDesign and Product: from Frenemy to Harmony
November 29, 2023
"Accessibility is a great example where OKRs can unify multiple product and design teams to a non-negotiable standard."
Bria Alexander Benson Low Natalya Pemberton Stephanie GoldthorpeOKRs—Helpful or Harmful?
January 20, 2022
"Stakeholders often fear participatory research because they don’t know the resources required or the outcomes they’ll get."
Nidhi Singh Rathore Amber DavisEmbracing participation to unlock deeper truths in commercial research
March 12, 2025
"Building more ethical, responsible, and humanistic forms of technologies requires diverse and interdisciplinary conversations."
Prayag Narula Rida QadriHCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer
March 28, 2023
"Designers wandering the halls won’t survive without a safe space made up of roles, processes, and infrastructure."
Dan WillisFilling the Void
November 7, 2018
"Research doesn’t start and end with the researcher; it’s about continual learning and supporting communities to keep learning."
Robert Fabricant Sahibzada Mayed Nidhi Singh RathoreIndustry junctures: Paths forwards for UXR and the critical decisions that get us there [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
October 2, 2024
"Much to my surprise, it was one of the most impactful research pieces I had produced in my career."
Cara Maritz Rachel NyThe Art of Extrapolation
March 29, 2023
"When you allow people to share their story, it's not just sharing to share; it's to contribute to better products, policies, and services."
Yasmine KhanChecking Bias and Listening to Financially Vulnerable Americans
March 30, 2020
"Many designers don't understand corporate realities and thus have an idealistic view that clashes with organizational constraints."
Peter MerholzThe 2025 State of UX/Design Organizational Health
November 12, 2025
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How do pragmatic pluralism and competing paradigms affect maternal health care delivery?
Why are some organizations moving away from third-party customer data platforms (CDPs)?
What strategies help UX teams translate usability findings into stakeholder-relevant outcomes like cost savings or risk reduction?