Fishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI
This video is featured in the Designing with AI 2025 playlist and 2 more.
Summary
Our team at Gazzetta, a media research lab, is tackling a fundamental challenge in journalism: the disconnect between media output and community needs, particularly in restricted or distorted information environments of autocracies. We have learnt over the past years that traditional audience research has led to quant-heavy, superficial understanding, ineffective content and, ultimately, irrelevance. To address this problem, we have developed a three-stage process using AI knowledge bases to build empathy, map information needs, and analyze information flows. We have used this process to systematically review multiple information sources to build deep community understanding before product development. This methodology has helped us preserve nuance, identify knowledge gaps, and assign confidence levels to findings. Rather than treating AI as a black box solution, a thoughtful process-oriented approach can help us better understand and serve information needs, and gradually rebuild relevance.
Key Insights
-
•
AI combined with structured research queries reveals deeper insights than traditional research when direct user access is limited.
-
•
Misalignment often exists between what organizations believe users need and what users actually need, as shown by North Korean fishermen preferring weather forecasts over political news.
-
•
Traditional engagement metrics only measure surface behavior, failing to capture true user information needs and satisfaction.
-
•
A shift from a theory of change (assuming known needs) to a theory of service (starting with understanding actual needs) is fundamental to effective media strategy and user-centered design.
-
•
A three-stage research approach—building empathy, prioritizing information gaps, and analyzing information flows—helps systematically leverage complex and scattered data.
-
•
Confidence rating of sources and insights is essential to prevent false certainty from AI-generated outputs.
-
•
Structured queries and systematic frameworks outperform opportunistic or freeform AI interactions, avoiding common pitfalls like overgeneralization and poor prompt design.
-
•
Human expertise, especially cultural knowledge, is indispensable to interpret AI outputs and maintain nuance.
-
•
Research repositories often hold untapped treasure troves of insights that, with structure and AI, can be mined even on shoestring budgets.
-
•
Visual coding of insights by confidence level improves transparency and decision-making among stakeholders.
Notable Quotes
"Journalists like me are in the business of interrogating reality to get at the truth."
"Those fishermen didn’t want political news—they wanted reliable weather forecasts to stay safe at sea."
"We spend millions on content that nobody wanted and that didn’t actually help people navigate their lives."
"Traditional metrics create a dangerous illusion where we optimize for what we can measure, not what people actually need."
"We’re moving from theory of change to theory of service: starting with what people actually need before creating anything."
"The careful application of structured queries can reveal deeper insights than traditional research alone."
"AI systems can present speculative connections as established facts, so confidence ratings are critical."
"Structure beats free form interaction—systematic query frameworks are essential to avoid pitfalls."
"Humans remain essential for evaluation, especially to interpret cultural nuance that AI often misses."
"Finding meaningful insights is not just casting a wide net—it requires discipline, structure, and knowing where to fish."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Government might expand its self-perception from service provider to facilitator who partners with constituents."
Frances Yllana Ann Buechner Jess Jones Betsy RamacciaD.E.A.R.R. Diaries (Discipline, Experience, Architecture, Reflection + Revolution)
November 16, 2022
"I simply cannot wait for you all to see the outstanding presentations they prepared."
Bria AlexanderTheme Two Intro
September 8, 2022
"All commercially available facial recognition software perform worse on darker females."
Dr. Jamika D. BurgeBroad Strokes: Connecting Design, Research, and AI to the World Around Us
June 7, 2023
"Anger doesn’t mean you have to yell—it’s about speaking clearly to the problem you see."
Joshua GravesWe Need To Talk: Navigating Conversations with Your Boss (Part 1 of 3)
April 14, 2025
"The proof of service design’s effectiveness is now out there in the growing diversity of case studies and practitioner voices."
Lavrans Løvlie Ben ReasonAsk me anything – Authors of Service Design: From Insight to Implementation
November 19, 2025
"I want researchers in the room in positions of power and influence to help executives see the broader social implications of technology."
Rebecca BuckMission: Keep Talent in Research Roles!
March 10, 2021
"We didn’t have a clear definition of what Verizon customer experiences were or how they behaved, which led us to create experience principles."
Sarah WilliamsVerizon_A Framework for CX Transformation
January 8, 2024
"We could not have this conference without you all — the curation team relies heavily on audience participation."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
September 9, 2022
"Starting with positives and acknowledging good work helps break down resistance when sharing findings that reveal weak points."
Joanna Vodopivec Prabhas PokharelOne Research Team for All - Influence Without Authority
March 9, 2022
