Fishing for Real Needs: Reimagining Journalism Needs with AI
This video is featured in the Designing with AI 2025 playlist and 2 more.
Summary
Our team at Gazzetta, a media research lab, is tackling a fundamental challenge in journalism: the disconnect between media output and community needs, particularly in restricted or distorted information environments of autocracies. We have learnt over the past years that traditional audience research has led to quant-heavy, superficial understanding, ineffective content and, ultimately, irrelevance. To address this problem, we have developed a three-stage process using AI knowledge bases to build empathy, map information needs, and analyze information flows. We have used this process to systematically review multiple information sources to build deep community understanding before product development. This methodology has helped us preserve nuance, identify knowledge gaps, and assign confidence levels to findings. Rather than treating AI as a black box solution, a thoughtful process-oriented approach can help us better understand and serve information needs, and gradually rebuild relevance.
Key Insights
-
•
AI combined with structured research queries reveals deeper insights than traditional research when direct user access is limited.
-
•
Misalignment often exists between what organizations believe users need and what users actually need, as shown by North Korean fishermen preferring weather forecasts over political news.
-
•
Traditional engagement metrics only measure surface behavior, failing to capture true user information needs and satisfaction.
-
•
A shift from a theory of change (assuming known needs) to a theory of service (starting with understanding actual needs) is fundamental to effective media strategy and user-centered design.
-
•
A three-stage research approach—building empathy, prioritizing information gaps, and analyzing information flows—helps systematically leverage complex and scattered data.
-
•
Confidence rating of sources and insights is essential to prevent false certainty from AI-generated outputs.
-
•
Structured queries and systematic frameworks outperform opportunistic or freeform AI interactions, avoiding common pitfalls like overgeneralization and poor prompt design.
-
•
Human expertise, especially cultural knowledge, is indispensable to interpret AI outputs and maintain nuance.
-
•
Research repositories often hold untapped treasure troves of insights that, with structure and AI, can be mined even on shoestring budgets.
-
•
Visual coding of insights by confidence level improves transparency and decision-making among stakeholders.
Notable Quotes
"Journalists like me are in the business of interrogating reality to get at the truth."
"Those fishermen didn’t want political news—they wanted reliable weather forecasts to stay safe at sea."
"We spend millions on content that nobody wanted and that didn’t actually help people navigate their lives."
"Traditional metrics create a dangerous illusion where we optimize for what we can measure, not what people actually need."
"We’re moving from theory of change to theory of service: starting with what people actually need before creating anything."
"The careful application of structured queries can reveal deeper insights than traditional research alone."
"AI systems can present speculative connections as established facts, so confidence ratings are critical."
"Structure beats free form interaction—systematic query frameworks are essential to avoid pitfalls."
"Humans remain essential for evaluation, especially to interpret cultural nuance that AI often misses."
"Finding meaningful insights is not just casting a wide net—it requires discipline, structure, and knowing where to fish."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"You can access the digital swag bag by scanning the QR code or visiting fld.me/cd2022 for cool sponsor offers."
Bria AlexanderOpening Remarks
November 17, 2022
"You’re constantly training people and optimizing protocols even after successful implementation."
Sofia QuinteroBeyond Tools: The Messy Business of Implementing Research Repositories
March 10, 2022
"Service blueprinting was a deeply empathy-building activity because each role had to help another walk in their shoes."
Alana Washington(Remote) Service Design: A Transformation Case Study
June 8, 2022
"Using pilots can get buy-in from stakeholders who might resist broad change initially."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024
"I resist premature optimization of tagging and structure; I want to be 80% there rather than perfect and distracted."
Jorge ArangoThe Best of Both Worlds: How to Integrate Paper and Digital Notes (1st of 3 seminars)
April 5, 2024
"Emojis and GIFs have become effective tools for remote teams to add expression and prevent miscommunication."
Jilanna WilsonDistributed Design Operations Management
October 23, 2019
"We want to deepen equity and care in how we work, who we do it with, and the output and impact it generates."
Ariel KennanTheme Two Intro
November 17, 2022
"We have weekly meetings with implementation teams to design APIs, discuss progress, and address issues to ensure alignment."
PJ Buddhari Nate BaldwinMeet Spectrum, Adobe’s Design System
June 9, 2021
"Asking stupid questions can lead experts to reframe their thinking and improve the work."
Dem Gerolemou Alexis Oh Neef RehmanClimate technology fundamentals
May 15, 2024
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Where can UX researchers find reliable, up-to-date information and recommendations on research tool options?
How can AI agents maintain context and prevent delivering misleading answers when searching research data?
In what ways can AI automate UX research tasks, and what limitations does it currently have?