Back to basics, or start from scratch?
Summary
Back to basics, or start from scratch? We’ve been bombarded with calls to reinvent, rethink, reframe, reconnect, redefine, reclaim, and even reckon with research over the past few years, and honestly, we thrive on it. But urgency, frustrations, and a rapidly changing world demand focus and action. Join Julie Norvaisas, Mina Jonsson, and Pert Eilers for an open, lively conversation about redefining purpose and value in 2025. They’re ditching abstractions in favor of action in this moment: quality, accountability, and community. Let’s get down to what truly matters. In this session, as we tie back to our conference themes of purpose and value, we’ll discuss: - Getting back to basics: How global shifts are driving a return to research fundamentals: quality, direct methods, and genuine connection. AI’s rise only amplifies this need. - Starting from scratch: We’ll challenge outdated narratives, redefine “impact” with practical techniques, and even provoke a fresh look at collaboration. Prepare to have your assumptions shaken. - Moving from “yes, and” to “yeah, but!” This isn’t a passive fireside chat. We want your “yeah, but” moments. Bring your perspectives, challenges, and even disagreements. Our goal is to create a dynamic dialogue about the future of research.
Key Insights
-
•
Curiosity remains the fundamental driving force and anchor for UX researchers despite evolving industry trends.
-
•
The core purpose of research—to improve human experiences—has not changed, though the methods to achieve it are in flux.
-
•
Traditional notions of rigor in research should be balanced with creativity and a focus on craft rather than rigid methods.
-
•
The words impact and influence are becoming buzzwords that lack clear meaning and may hinder genuine accountability.
-
•
Accountability across teams is more productive than focusing solely on researchers proving impact.
-
•
Collaboration is often misunderstood; true collaboration requires balanced power dynamics and active engagement.
-
•
The UX field is disproportionately burdened with justifying its value compared to other disciplines.
-
•
Old recruitment methods for research participants may no longer serve us, calling for fresh approaches to combating the crisis of access.
-
•
The community and relational trust within research teams are critical anchors in tumultuous times.
-
•
Reconsidering and explicitly defining often-used terms like collaboration, rigor, and impact can improve communication and outcomes.
Notable Quotes
"I think curiosity is what brought me into this in the first place and it’s our superpower."
"The purpose of research stays the same: connecting the people creating software to the humans using it."
"Rigor doesn’t mean rigid; there needs to be some creativity allowed there too."
"Impact and influence have become buzzwords with no real meaning; we need to focus on making a difference."
"We have to be each other’s cavalry right now — leaning into things for our own and each other’s sake."
"Collaboration often feels like a mask for entering an unequal relationship with partners."
"If the smartest person in the room always takes a certain role, then it’s not a learning culture."
"It’s irresponsible to keep our heads in the sand; we can’t ignore the noise and uncertainty around us."
"We need to add context to our conversations and take some power back when asked to prove impact."
"We must be explicit about what we mean when we say collaboration or rigor to avoid vague expectations."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"There are no screen readers built in for VR/AR yet; accessibility is still considered a hack in these spaces."
Sam ProulxTo Boldly Go: The New Frontiers of Accessibility
November 18, 2022
"There’s no one-size-fits-all approach; budgets and needs vary widely across researchers and organizations."
JP Allen Carrie Boyd Malcolm EvansNavigating the UX Tool Landscape
March 11, 2021
"The US digital service ecosystem has grown remarkably, showing we’re not alone in this journey."
Kara KaneTheme One Intro
November 16, 2022
"An agent is anything that displays agency, the ability to take actions and choose which actions to take."
Christopher NoesselAI of the now: Designing for Agents
July 31, 2024
"Making sure your interview panel includes someone a candidate can identify with is a small but critical step."
Jackie Velasquez-RossTalent Acquisition and Our Responsibility
June 16, 2020
"The Stafford Act repairs infrastructure to pre-existing conditions, not better, which hampers resilience and meaningful long-term change."
Alicia D. JohnsonDisasters and the 21st Century
December 10, 2021
"Please don’t delegate hiring to HR—hiring managers must set clear criteria and be personally involved to avoid bias."
Silke Bochat5 Antifragile Strategies for a DesignOps 2.0
September 23, 2024
"We know users are important, but there are very few user research roles compared to design or engineering."
Gregg BernsteinOpportunistic Research with Gregg Bernstein
July 11, 2019
"We openly talk about burnout and mental health so people feel comfortable reaching out when they need to."
Ana FerreiraDesigning Distributed: Leading Doist’s Fully Remote Design Team in Six Countries
January 8, 2024
