Summary
This session is intended to be messy and will leave you with more questions than you came in with. We shall start off by asking ourselves “what are you pretending not to know?” This question inspired by African-American scholar and activist Toni Cade Bambara will guide us into the conversation. How do we understand our role as researchers? In what ways are we complicit in reproducing structural inequities and systemic harm? This manifesto is centered around 3 “big” themes: At what and whose cost do we engage in research? What right do I have to engage in this research work? What if I refused to participate? This is an invitation to get intimate with ourselves and investigate the privilege(s) we hold as researchers and designers. Reflecting on the power imbalances that exist, how can we move toward a culturally thriving and sustainably empowering approach to emancipatory research that centers minoritized communities? Asking these questions and sitting with their complexities is urgent and necessary. Together, we strive for less extractive, decolonial, and anti-capitalist visions for research that are rooted in liberatory harm reduction, relationship building and community empowerment.
Key Insights
-
•
Empathy should be considered the floor, not the ceiling, in research practice.
-
•
Researchers must recognize and reckon with the oppressor role embedded within themselves.
-
•
The money pipeline, including sources and compensation methods, deeply influences ethical research.
-
•
Time is a weaponized social and cultural currency that can perpetuate harm in research.
-
•
Research should reject mining metaphors and instead honor the full humanity of participants.
-
•
Distinguishing between right and entitlement is crucial for responsible research engagement.
-
•
Communal proximity does not guarantee the right to represent or engage in certain research.
-
•
Trauma experience should not be used as a gatekeeping tool or justification for research involvement.
-
•
Agency includes the choice to refuse participation and reclaim control in research settings.
-
•
Safe spaces in research are problematic; focusing on harm reduction and restorative practices is preferable.
Notable Quotes
"The true focus of revolutionary change is never merely the oppressive situation we seek to escape but the piece of the oppressor that lives in all of us - Audre Lorde."
"If you walk in someone else’s shoes, then you’ve taken their shoes - Wendy Hill Count Chun."
"Time itself has been commodified and weaponized to reproduce systemic harm and inequities."
"This is not a mining operation; humans are not gemstones waiting to be extracted."
"Do I have a right to engage in this work or do I feel entitled to it? Often it’s both."
"Communal proximity does not guarantee the right to engage or represent an entire community."
"Choosing to remain silent is still a choice - agency always exists in research participation."
"Safe spaces tend to harbor privilege because they make some people feel safer than others."
"We all have the capacity to cause harm, whether intentional or not, and thus responsibility for harm reduction."
"Much of the work of oppression is policing the imagination, conditioning us to believe we’ve lost rights or power - Ida Hartman."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Designers rarely take the time to self-reflect, but visual tools help engage them in the process."
Shaping design, designers and teams
November 8, 2018
"A hackathon with designers, developers, business and architects can accelerate UI coded component delivery."
Sabrina Mach Nina WainwrightHow to Design Your Design Operating Model
September 29, 2021
"As we age, we all face some cognitive or physical challenges. Accessibility helps our future selves."
Samuel ProulxInvisible barriers: Why accessible service design can’t be an afterthought
December 3, 2024
"You can’t just throw another tool at accessibility problems; training and culture are just as important."
Saara Kamppari-MillerDesignOps for Inclusive Design and Accessibility (Videoconference)
May 26, 2022
"Product design and development can often mirror what happens in a chef’s kitchen: lots of coordination and spinning plates behind the scenes."
Briana ThomasThe Quiet Force: Uncovering Hidden Leadership in High-Impact Design Teams
September 24, 2024
"The hardest part about remote is making design reviews feel collaborative and team-based."
Adam Cutler Karen Pascoe Ian Swinson Susan WorthmanDiscussion
June 8, 2016
"I’m hoping that once we figure this out, I can kind of go back to my old goal and break those rules."
Operationalizing DesignOps
November 7, 2018
"Journey maps and personas often disappear into the void because they’re too dense for business folks to consume."
Leah Buley Joe NatoliAsk Me Anything with Leah Buley and Joe Natoli, co-authors of The User Experience Team of One (2nd edition)
October 8, 2024
"The most important value delivered to customers is always the qualitative value—the emotional and experiential impact."
Nathan ShedroffDouble Your Mileage: Use Your Research Strategically
March 31, 2020