Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Research in the Face of Complexity: New Sensibility for New Situations
Summary
How we design and deliver products is changing; how research plays is following suit. Our environment is complex, and evolving. AI’s role in design, product, research, and engineering is accelerating. New practices are shifting the boundaries between our functions. Strategic research programs play outside of functional lines, working with the fabric product development and the needs of different teams and situations. We shift our focus from tuning and scaling the research machine, towards tending the garden of shared understanding and possibility. In this session, we’ll explore paths for research practitioners and programs who want to operate effectively in uncertainty. We’ll discuss how complexity informs research strategy, and look at activity in the organization through lenses that create new opportunities for the research practice.
Key Insights
-
•
Most product organizations operate within complex adaptive systems, not predictable or purely complicated environments.
-
•
Traditional research projects that produce isolated insights often fail to impact product outcomes effectively.
-
•
Managing emergence—the unpredictable unfolding of outcomes—should be a core research focus rather than just delivering findings.
-
•
Dave Snowden’s Cynefin framework helps distinguish domains: clear, complicated, complex, and chaotic, with complexity being the key challenge for product teams.
-
•
Using vineyard management as a metaphor highlights that contextual factors drastically affect outcomes, meaning research approaches must be tailored per team context.
-
•
Direct actions or recommendations in complex systems rarely achieve desired outcomes without managing interactions and relationships.
-
•
Research democratization is promising but needs nuanced, context-specific approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.
-
•
Tools like AIMS (Acting, Interactions, Monitors, Scaffolding) provide ways to intervene thoughtfully in complex adaptive systems.
-
•
Continuous agile cycles can be limiting for research; longer, consultative, and milestone-based approaches may be required to handle complexity.
-
•
Building trust and relationships, especially for remote researchers, is crucial to gaining access and influence within complex teams.
Notable Quotes
"Research alone is insufficient to solve complex organizational problems; it’s more about learning how to work with the teams and complexity."
"Helping teams is much more like managing a children’s party than engineering a bridge."
"If you want to grow good grapes, you need to manage the vineyard well—but every vineyard has different demands due to its context."
"Direct action rarely gets what we want in complex systems; instead, we must know what we can actually manage."
"Introducing insights into a system is just adding a new actor; without managing interactions, nothing changes."
"Democratization of research is interesting but not a one-size-fits-all; it needs quick assessment of what a team truly needs."
"Monitoring for weak signals and early signs of emergence is as important as intervention itself."
"Putting scaffolding in place helps self-organization in complexity—like training wires in vineyards or using shared maps in teams."
"Most research methods come from an engineering mindset suitable for complicated problems, but product problems are mostly complex."
"Working with complexity requires maintaining ambiguity as long as possible before converging on action."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Building incentives and celebrating deferred impact rewards researchers and drives behavior towards reusable knowledge creation."
Ben Davies Matt Duignan Andrew Michael Dr. Emily DiLeoExpert Panel: The Principles of Research Repository Design
March 11, 2022
"You aren’t your user, but we are users of this system, so we know what we need to make it better."
Russ UngerGetting Out from Under Everyone: How to Escape the Paralysis of Getting Started
June 8, 2016
"This process has moved us from facilitators of knowledge to owners of knowledge."
Elizabeth Sklar Jessica ShengCo-creating research enablement with your tech org: a case study
March 10, 2026
"When difference comes together, something new emerges neither could have traveled alone."
Victor UdoewaTheme One Intro
March 27, 2023
"Inclusion, collaboration, and iteration are the three pillars of how we work with authors to make a book."
Louis RosenfeldCoffee with Lou: Should You Write a (UX) Book?
March 7, 2024
"It’s not a theme unless you can put your hand over every sticky note and the label explains the story."
Erin May Roberta Dombrowski Laura Oxenfeld Brooke HintonDistributed, Democratized, Decentralized: Finding a Research Model to Support Your Org
March 10, 2022
"People and process design are real, real things we have to consider, not just the technology piece."
Alexandra SchmidtEnterprise UX Playbook
December 1, 2022
"Words are how we express our values, our philosophies, why we do what we do as designers and researchers."
Saara Kamppari-Miller"Prototype" vs "Prototype"--Breaking Down and Rebuilding Our Understanding of What We Do
October 24, 2019
"Introducing design gates allowed us to finally stop the shipment of bad products."
Sam YenDriving Organizational Change Through Design? Do more of this and less of that
June 9, 2017
