Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.
Log in Create free account100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.
Research in the Face of Complexity: New Sensibility for New Situations
Summary
How we design and deliver products is changing; how research plays is following suit. Our environment is complex, and evolving. AI’s role in design, product, research, and engineering is accelerating. New practices are shifting the boundaries between our functions. Strategic research programs play outside of functional lines, working with the fabric product development and the needs of different teams and situations. We shift our focus from tuning and scaling the research machine, towards tending the garden of shared understanding and possibility. In this session, we’ll explore paths for research practitioners and programs who want to operate effectively in uncertainty. We’ll discuss how complexity informs research strategy, and look at activity in the organization through lenses that create new opportunities for the research practice.
Key Insights
-
•
Most product organizations operate within complex adaptive systems, not predictable or purely complicated environments.
-
•
Traditional research projects that produce isolated insights often fail to impact product outcomes effectively.
-
•
Managing emergence—the unpredictable unfolding of outcomes—should be a core research focus rather than just delivering findings.
-
•
Dave Snowden’s Cynefin framework helps distinguish domains: clear, complicated, complex, and chaotic, with complexity being the key challenge for product teams.
-
•
Using vineyard management as a metaphor highlights that contextual factors drastically affect outcomes, meaning research approaches must be tailored per team context.
-
•
Direct actions or recommendations in complex systems rarely achieve desired outcomes without managing interactions and relationships.
-
•
Research democratization is promising but needs nuanced, context-specific approaches rather than one-size-fits-all solutions.
-
•
Tools like AIMS (Acting, Interactions, Monitors, Scaffolding) provide ways to intervene thoughtfully in complex adaptive systems.
-
•
Continuous agile cycles can be limiting for research; longer, consultative, and milestone-based approaches may be required to handle complexity.
-
•
Building trust and relationships, especially for remote researchers, is crucial to gaining access and influence within complex teams.
Notable Quotes
"Research alone is insufficient to solve complex organizational problems; it’s more about learning how to work with the teams and complexity."
"Helping teams is much more like managing a children’s party than engineering a bridge."
"If you want to grow good grapes, you need to manage the vineyard well—but every vineyard has different demands due to its context."
"Direct action rarely gets what we want in complex systems; instead, we must know what we can actually manage."
"Introducing insights into a system is just adding a new actor; without managing interactions, nothing changes."
"Democratization of research is interesting but not a one-size-fits-all; it needs quick assessment of what a team truly needs."
"Monitoring for weak signals and early signs of emergence is as important as intervention itself."
"Putting scaffolding in place helps self-organization in complexity—like training wires in vineyards or using shared maps in teams."
"Most research methods come from an engineering mindset suitable for complicated problems, but product problems are mostly complex."
"Working with complexity requires maintaining ambiguity as long as possible before converging on action."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Design permeates everything as a lens through which you see the world; philosophy is just a different shaped lens."
Cennydd BowlesExit Interview #2: Rediscovering the ethical heart of design
November 6, 2025
"Every piece of research we’ve conducted represents valuable context and insights that can still guide us today."
Katie HansenFinding the unknown in the known: Harnessing meta-analysis and literature review
March 12, 2025
"The best way is to distribute the accessibility work so it becomes light work for everyone."
Sam ProulxAccessibility: An Opportunity to Innovate
March 9, 2022
"The current design education system doesn't always prepare designers for the complexity of enterprise challenges."
Alexandra SchmidtEnterprise UX Playbook
December 1, 2022
"If we get garbage in, we get garbage out — this is true for AI as much as for surveys or forms."
Caroline JarrettGarbage in, garbage out? Measuring error rates to get ready for AI
January 8, 2026
"Managerialism justifies one size fits all efficiency techniques that increase burnout and diminish professional authority."
Meghan BausoneSystems Thinking and Design Innovation: Working with Leverage Points in Rural Maternal Health Systems
April 17, 2026
"Zoom fatigue is real, people are not necessarily keen to go into another Zoom meeting even if they think it’s valuable."
Shelby SwitzerMaking Space for Community Knowledge-sharing in a Distributed World
December 10, 2021
"Everyone, both speakers and participants, understood the assignment of civic design from day one."
Bria Alexander Ariel Kennan Charlotte Lee Sarah Brooks Emily Lessard Gordon Ross Joanne DongReflect and Chart Forward
December 10, 2021
"Real research by real teams that can build real products and show customers they're listening is massively helpful."
Smitha Papolu Nova Wehman-Brown Melissa Schmidt Adam MenterTheme 3 Discussion
June 4, 2019
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
How does including metadata like methodology, market, and date improve the quality of research repository search results?
What additional materials come with the conference recordings in Rosenverse?
Where can UX researchers find reliable, up-to-date information and recommendations on research tool options?