Rosenverse
Discussion

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

Discussion

Gold
Wednesday, May 13, 2015 • Enterprise UX 2015
Share the love for this talk
Discussion
Speakers: David Cronin , Uday Gajendar , Peter Morville and Kendra Shimmell
Link:

Summary

In this talk, the panelists explore how to identify critical inflection points in product development marked by growing complexity and user confusion, as highlighted by the consultant who often joins after chaos has emerged. Uday emphasizes the importance of aligning the highest representatives from marketing, engineering, and UX teams using the three-in-the-box model, supplemented by a wild card from orthogonal domains to spark innovation. Dave shares his traditional, people-first approach to understanding complex domains by deeply engaging with long-tenured subject matter experts. He details how his team manages their design system through enterprise agile practices, prioritizing impactful features and balancing stakeholder needs. Dave also addresses challenges like superficial adoption of design frameworks (IIDX washing) and stresses that their team invests more effort in facilitating workshops and teaching proper use of the system than just maintaining it, underscoring the synergy between conversations and prototyping tools for innovation.

Key Insights

  • Inflection points often become evident when users display confusion during usability testing, even with familiar tools.

  • Hiring an external consultant usually happens after an inflection point has caused chaos and complexity.

  • The three-in-the-box model—marketing, engineering, and UX leaders—is crucial for aligning diverse opinions around a common goal.

  • Introducing a ‘wild card’ from an orthogonal domain can spark innovative thinking in product teams.

  • Deep domain understanding comes from engaging with end users and long-tenured subject matter experts rather than relying solely on system mapping.

  • Design systems should be treated like living software products with backlogs, QA, and prioritized feature requests.

  • ‘IIDX washing’ occurs when teams superficially use a design framework to claim UX improvements without real change, which requires both confrontation and letting user adoption reveal the truth.

  • More effort is often spent teaching people how to use design systems effectively than on maintaining the systems themselves.

  • Combining creative workshops with prototyping tools accelerates feedback cycles and innovation.

  • In large ecosystems with many developers, contextual understanding is key to selecting the appropriate design components or 'LEGOs'.

Notable Quotes

"One sign of evidence that you've passed an inflection point is when you hire me as a consultant."

"When I see users saying, oh my goodness, I didn’t know it did that, that’s a clear sign of too much complexity."

"The three-in-the-box model means having marketing, engineering, and UX leaders working collaboratively."

"I always like to try to introduce a wild card from a slightly orthogonal field to spark the thinking."

"I start by going and talking to the people, the end users, and the subject matter experts who have been working in the field for decades."

"We treat the design system like a software product with a backlog, QA, and a product owner prioritizing feature requests."

"IIDX washing is when people replicate button by button and checkbox by checkbox, then claim better UX."

"Usually, the users not adopting the product alerts the organization that deeper issues exist beyond UI."

"We’ve put much more effort into workshop facilitation and teaching how to use the space effectively than on the design system itself."

"Creative conversations combined with material for quick prototyping let you get fast feedback on messy whiteboard ideas."

Ask the Rosenbot
Kristin Taylor
Building Bridges Across Organizational Silos
2022 • Civic Design 2022
Gold
Elana Chapman
Getting started with accessibility research
2025 • Rosenfeld Community
Xenia Adjoubei
Empowering Communities Through the Researcher in Residence Program
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Nick Cochran
Growing in Enterprise Design through Making Connections
2019 • Enterprise Community
Robin Beers
How to create actionable insight in the face of politics and silos [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2023 • Advancing Research Community
Bria Alexander
Theme Two Intro
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Jane Reid
Self-care in User Research
2020 • Advancing Research Community
Ana Ferreira
Designing Distributed: Leading Doist’s Fully Remote Design Team in Six Countries
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Andrew Custage
The Digital Journey: Research on Consumer Frustration and Loyalty
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Robin Beers
Panel: Excellence in Communicating Insights
2024 • Advancing Research 2024
Gold
Shan Shen
Translating UX Terms into Business Contexts
2023 • Design in Product 2023
Gold
Etienne Fang
The Power of Care: From Human-Centered Research to Humanity-Centered Leadership
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Jon Fukuda
Design Planning and Management Support
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Jennifer Strickland
Adopting a "Design By" Method
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Kristin Skinner
Theme 2: Introduction and Provocation
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2020
Gold
Erin May
Distributed, Democratized, Decentralized: Finding a Research Model to Support Your Org
2022 • Advancing Research 2022
Gold

More Videos

Carl Turner

"When projects are late or delayed it’s often due to organizational and cultural issues rather than conduct of the project team."

Carl Turner

You Can Do This: Understand and Solve Organizational Problems to Jumpstart a Dead Project

March 28, 2023

Karen Pascoe

"If there’s a performance gap, don’t sit on it; it doesn’t age well and hurts the team, employee, and business."

Karen Pascoe

Developing Experience Teams and Talent in the Enterprise

June 8, 2016

Jilanna Wilson

"When you remove nonverbal cues from communication, messages get easily misinterpreted."

Jilanna Wilson

Distributed Design Operations Management

October 23, 2019

Shawna Hein

"Designers contribute experimental patterns back to the design system early, making their work visible even before full validation."

Shawna Hein Kevin Hoffman

Create a Cohesive Civic Design Practice Across Agency, Vendors, and Contracts

November 17, 2022

Barb Spanton

"Working in healthcare means every tiny moment in a patient’s experience can either uphold or erode their dignity and sense of control."

Barb Spanton

Doing Work That Matters: A Look Beyond The Idealistic Notion of 'Doing Meaningful Work'

June 10, 2022

Briana Thomas

"We decided not to chase shiny objects because we wanted to stay true to our mission."

Briana Thomas

The Quiet Force: Uncovering Hidden Leadership in High-Impact Design Teams

September 24, 2024

Gina Mendolia

"Service design is 10% connecting the dots and 90% creating the conditions that bring those dots closer together."

Gina Mendolia

Therapists, Coaches, and Grandmas: Techniques for Service Design in Complex Systems

December 3, 2024

Lija Hogan

"We need to become data ethicists and curators, not just data vacuum cleaners, to prioritize quality data."

Lija Hogan Milan Mijatovic Sam Proulx Louis Rosenfeld

Three Years Out: Perspectives on the Near-Term Future of User Research

March 15, 2024

John Calhoun

"Our design ops team was a step behind the growth of our design team, solving the wrong problems at the wrong scale."

John Calhoun Rachel Posman

Two Sides of the DesignOps Coin: Teams Ops and Product Ops

January 8, 2024