Research is a team sport: advancing the work when everyone does the research
Summary
As UX roles evolve amid AI tooling, democratized practices, and shifting org structures, many experienced researchers are spending less time conducting studies—and more time enabling others to do it well. In complex environments like healthcare, the question is no longer whether research should happen continuously, but who does it, when it happens, and how “good” it needs to be to move the work forward. In this lightning talk, James Wieselman Schulman shares how he’s helped build a culture where research isn’t reserved for specialists, but embedded throughout design and delivery. Drawing from service and healthcare design, he explores how cross-functional teams can engage in research responsibly—without lowering standards or losing sight of ethics, rigor, and trust. You’ll hear practical examples of how to: Use research continuously—not just at the start—to shape workshops, prototypes, MVPs, and business decisions; create clear guardrails so non-researchers can conduct meaningful (even if imperfect) research and learn through doing; redefine research ROI around impact, learning velocity, and organizational confidence, not methodological perfection The opportunity isn’t to replace expertise, but to extend it. When expert researchers shift from gatekeepers to coaches, they raise the floor for everyone, protect what makes research human, and ensure empathy remains at the center of the work. This session is for researchers, designers, and leaders navigating the shift from research doer to research enabler. It offers a pragmatic, human-centered view of research—one where five good conversations can be better than none, learning happens through action, and advancing the work matters more than protecting the role.
Key Insights
-
•
Resource constraints require us to involve non-researchers in conducting and experiencing research.
-
•
Democratizing empathy means getting designers, engineers, and product owners closer to real users.
-
•
Palchinsky’s principles—novelty, survivability, and learnability—offer a useful lens for scaling empathy via research.
-
•
Novel experiences with user research can help non-experts develop human-centered mindsets despite imperfect methods.
-
•
Survivability means enabling experimentation that doesn’t threaten project budgets or organizational stability.
-
•
A small amount of imperfect research by partners still yields valuable learning and maintains overall ROI.
-
•
Learnability depends on creating feedback loops where researchers coach and mentor collaborators.
-
•
Repeated practice with scaled research tasks helps non-researchers gain skills without risking critical projects.
-
•
Empathy often emerges more from the experience of doing or observing research than from insights alone.
-
•
Researchers should become organizational thought leaders guiding when and how to involve others in research.
Notable Quotes
"We are asked to produce more and more work with fewer people and smaller teams."
"How might we democratize empathy at scale within our organizations?"
"The goal is not methodological perfection; empathy is the end game."
"Even bad research can be good because it creates learning opportunities."
"Ten interviews is enough to get most of the way to meaningful insights."
"Getting partners involved in research may mean accepting some imperfect interviews."
"Research is something that should happen throughout the process — early and often."
"The most transformative part of research is being involved in the work itself."
"You have to find ways for people to practice so they can learn without destroying projects."
"Researchers can become thought leaders by coaching and mentoring others on empathy and research."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If you said are you creative, I’m gonna say hell yeah."
Dr. Karl JeffriesThe Science of Creativity for DesignOps
January 8, 2024
"Any service is a configuration of enterprise elements, reshaping and enabling the enterprise to deliver that service."
Milan Guenther Benjamin KumpfThe $212 billion ‘so what?’: unlocking impact in development cooperation
November 20, 2025
"It’s not enough to build a repository and expect people to come; you need a distribution strategy to put research where users are."
Ben Davies Matt Duignan Andrew Michael Dr. Emily DiLeoExpert Panel: The Principles of Research Repository Design
March 11, 2022
"People plus practices plus places equals artifacts."
Phil GilbertA Consistent Culture of Design
May 14, 2015
"Drivers continued the practice of hanging out in physical base camp spots despite platforms saying they wanted to get rid of them."
Prayag Narula Rida QadriHCI 2.0: Humanity Deserves the Attention that UX Research has to Offer
March 28, 2023
"Those roles enable others to do their best work and scale collaboration across teams."
Ned Dwyer Emily Stewart James WallisThe Intersection of Design and ResearchOps
September 24, 2024
"You have to make everything easily accessible; friction drives customers away."
Erin WeigelReal-world lessons to improve your conversion rates
June 26, 2024
"If accessibility is buried three levels deep in a checklist, it’s going to get missed."
Samuel ProulxFrom Standards to Innovation: Why Inclusive Design Wins
November 19, 2025
"Mastery is a core human motivator; people want to understand and feel competent in what they do."
Cheryl PlatzEmbrace Your Fun Factor: Game Development Best Practices for Product Design
January 9, 2026
