Rosenverse
SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population

This video is only accessible to Gold members. Log in or register for a free Gold Trial Account to watch.

Log in Register

Most conference talks are accessible to Gold members, while community videos are generally available to all logged-in members.

SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population

Gold
Wednesday, June 9, 2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Share the love for this talk
SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
Speakers: Sam Proulx
Link:

Summary

Did you know that the SUS creates biases in your research, affecting one in five people? That’s right! People with disabilities, especially those who use assistive technology, are not considered by most of the questions in the SUS. When the SUS was invented, the author encouraged people to change it to suit different needs. In this talk, Samuel Proulx and Abid Virani from Fable will discuss how Fable adapted the SUS to work for assistive technology users. Drawing from over five thousand hours of research and testing involving assistive technology users, we created the Accessible Usability Scale (AUS). This presentation will include trends in AUS responses since it was released in December of 2020.

Key Insights

  • Assistive technologies mainly split into screen readers, screen magnifiers, and alternative navigation devices, each with distinct user needs.

  • Screen reader users heavily rely on semantic web structure and proper labeling for efficient navigation.

  • Magnification users often supplement their experience with screen reader features to reduce eye strain.

  • Alternative navigation users use multiple input methods like voice commands and head mice, providing fallback options.

  • Traditional usability labs and standard SUS questionnaires fail to consider unique accessibility challenges and setup of assistive tech users.

  • SUS questions like needing technical support or learning speed are confusing or irrelevant to assistive tech users without adaptation.

  • Fable created the Accessible Usability Scale to better evaluate assistive tech user experience by adapting question language and scope.

  • Preliminary AUS data indicates screen reader users experience the lowest usability scores due to lack of backup input methods.

  • Remote usability testing greatly increases participation and authentic results by allowing users to test in familiar, customized environments.

  • User skill with assistive tech, experience level, and mental models vary significantly and must be considered beyond linear novice-expert scales.

Notable Quotes

"Assistive technology includes software and hardware that people with disabilities use to access computers."

"Screen readers let us jump directly to content, replicating visual skimming of a web page."

"Expert screen reader users listen at over 300 words per minute and still fully understand the content."

"Magnification can cover the entire screen two to ten times, and users pan around to see different areas."

"Many magnification tools also have screen reader functions to reduce eye strain and help users."

"Alternative navigation users might use voice commands, head mice, or grid coordinates to access elements."

"Traditional usability labs often force assistive tech users to use unfamiliar setups, creating barriers."

"I am a technical person, yet I might still need someone who can see to help me use certain sites."

"Accessibility is a spectrum; if frequent tasks require assistance, the product is inaccessible for me."

"Remote testing helps get closer to real-world results because users are in environments customized for them."

Ask the Rosenbot
Sam Proulx
Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
2023 • Advancing Research 2023
Gold
Kristin Skinner
8 Types of Measures in Design Operations
2020 • DesignOps Community
Kate Kalcevich
Integrating Accessibility in DesignOps
2024 • DesignOps Summit 2024
Gold
Sam Proulx
SUS: A System Unusable for Twenty Percent of the Population
2021 • Design at Scale 2021
Gold
Sam Proulx
Understanding Screen Readers on Mobile: How And Why to Learn from Native Users
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Tim Frick
The journey of building a sustainable design practice
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Irina Tikhonova
Small Wins, Big Impact: Leveraging and Elevating User Engagement
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Catherine Dubut
Bridging Physical and Digital Spaces: Approaches to Retail Service Design
2021 • Enterprise Community
Dan Willis
Enterprise Storytelling Sessions
2019 • Enterprise Experience 2019
Gold
James Chudley
Decarbonising User Journeys: How minimising enables us to do more with less
2025 • Climate UX Interest Group
Bob Baxley
Theme 4: Intro
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Jemma Ahmed
Collaboration: learning from other fields beyond our own [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Sheryl Cababa
Day 2 Panel
2024 • Designing with AI 2024
Gold
Wendy Johansson
Design at Scale: Behind the Scenes
2021 • Enterprise Community
Johanna Kollmann
Insights-Driven Product Strategy: Get your Research to Count
2022 • Design in Product 2022
Gold
Abby Covert
Panel: Collaboration Tools
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold

More Videos

Jerome “Axle” Brown

"Combining synchronous and asynchronous communication within one session gets us from awareness to action."

Jerome “Axle” Brown

How to Use Self-Directed Learning to Ensure Your Research Insights are Heard and Acted Upon

March 11, 2021

Phil Gilbert

"IBM Design Thinking is about collaborating around artifacts and frameworks, not prescribing the process teams must follow."

Phil Gilbert

A Consistent Culture of Design

May 14, 2015

Kate Towsey

"Research is democratized: if you’re not democratizing, you probably don’t even realize everyone in your company is talking to users in different ways."

Kate Towsey Basel Fakhoury Oren Friedman Graham Gardner

Participant Recruitment and Management Tools

March 12, 2026

Sohit Karol

"Machine learning used to be backend technology, but now millions of consumer experiences are decided by machines or algorithms."

Sohit Karol

Designing Delightful Listening Experiences: Mixed Methods Research in the Age of Machine Learning

March 31, 2020

Christopher Taylor Edwards

"Psychological safety comes from having hard conversations upfront and requires demonstration from leadership."

Christopher Taylor Edwards Valerie Roske

Design as a Team Practice, A Practical Guide to Cross-functional Collaboration

September 30, 2021

Sheryl Cababa

"There is no silver bullet in system-level challenges; multiple interventions across different domains are needed."

Sheryl Cababa

Expanding Your Design Lens with Systems Thinking

February 23, 2023

Francesca Barrientos, PhD

"You need to come up with your own definition of design maturity based on your team’s understanding and context."

Francesca Barrientos, PhD

You Need Your Own Definition of Design Maturity

June 8, 2022

Allison Sanders

"It’s important to create space outside work for people to connect to meaningful activities and communities."

Allison Sanders

Operating with Purpose

January 8, 2024

Saara Kamppari-Miller

"It’s not about the diagram, it’s about the dialogue."

Saara Kamppari-Miller

"Prototype" vs "Prototype"--Breaking Down and Rebuilding Our Understanding of What We Do

October 24, 2019