Summary
We're all familiar with the standard justification for secondary research - it's a process to contextualise what's already known to plan more focused (primary) research studies. Among research practitioners and non-researchers, secondary research is rarely thought of as a method in itself - and rather a supplementary phase of work before the real investigation begins. In this talk, we hope to convince fellow researchers that secondary research can be more powerful and impactful than just offering a foundational starting point. With the right "research infrastructure‚" secondary research can allow us to step back, triangulate and evaluate not only a larger corpus of data but also consider data from different sources and teams to make better-informed decisions. We share how we evolved our secondary research processes to do more efficient research and help our teams make more informed decisions.
Key Insights
-
•
Secondary research can be a superpower by enabling ethical, efficient use of existing data to minimize participant fatigue.
-
•
Broadly defined, secondary research includes internal reports, third-party studies, and triangulation with unstructured live data like support tickets and analytics.
-
•
Many stakeholders believe secondary research is less rigorous or less applicable than primary, but presenting relevant data early can change this perception.
-
•
Structuring and curating secondary data into accessible repositories is critical yet often overlooked in organizations.
-
•
Secondary research is not merely a precursor to primary research but a strategic, standalone practice with value in discovery and synthesis phases.
-
•
Poor collaboration around data access and interpretation is a major barrier; proactive relationship building with other teams can alleviate this.
-
•
Sharing credit and demonstrating impact to data collaborators helps foster ongoing support and buy-in.
-
•
Secondary research can lower barriers to entry by democratizing access to large scale or costly datasets within an organization.
-
•
Refreshing secondary data depends on research type and problem space, with some 'evergreen' behavioral insights remaining valid longer.
-
•
Engaging stakeholders in the secondary research process—through sharing findings or workshops—can make it feel more active and valuable.
Notable Quotes
"I wasn’t making the most of the primary data I was collecting and not sitting with that data long enough to internalize what I was hearing."
"Secondary research is a way to respect your target population’s time rather than constantly dipping into them for new research."
"Stakeholders often believe secondary research is less rigorous or less applicable because it doesn’t perfectly align with their questions or populations."
"Starting a simple repository—even a table with titles, summaries, teams, and tags—can make all the difference in accessing existing research."
"Secondary research is not just a precursor; it can be a strategic piece of work that counts as real research."
"Building regular relationships early—even before you have a data request—helps build mutual understanding and collaboration."
"Delivering a clear request and explaining your project’s goals improves collaborator buy-in and clarity."
"Sharing credit with collaborators demonstrates you’re a good partner and highlights their impact on your work."
"The shelf life of secondary research depends on the type of research—some insights are evergreen while others need refreshing based on context changes."
"Bringing stakeholders along on the analysis process or workshops can make secondary research feel more engaging and active."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"If I don’t trust you, how can I feel safe with you?"
Zariah CameronReDesigning Wellbeing for Equitable Care in the Workplace
September 23, 2024
"Ownership means belonging to the person who anticipates, observes, or monitors the prioritization process—not distributed ownership."
John Cutler Harry MaxPrioritization for designers and product managers (1st of 3 seminars) (Videoconference)
June 13, 2024
"Sense-making is a motivated, continuous effort to understand connections and act effectively."
Nick CochranGrowing in Enterprise Design through Making Connections
June 3, 2019
"Pilot and test your ideas before committing whenever possible to avoid unnecessary disruption."
Deanna SmithLeading Change with Confidence: Strategies for Optimizing Your Process
September 23, 2024
"We’re now looking to help legislators think about digital outcomes as they draft new laws and regulations."
Magdalena ZadaraZero Hour: How to Get Far Quickly When Starting Your Digital Service Unit Late
November 16, 2022
"We didn’t exploit the knowledge gap. Everyone was willing to say I don’t know. Can you help me?"
Nova Wehman-BrownWe've Never Done This Before
June 4, 2019
"We human researchers can help go way beyond proxy metrics such as button clicks and provide true validation of model accuracy."
Liwei DaiThe Heart and Brain of the AI Research
March 31, 2020
"There were quick and dirty solutions whose legacy remains a risk for ongoing COVID work, not all a good news story as we pivot out of COVID."
Gordon Ross12 Months of COVID-19 Design and Digital Response with the British Columbia Government
December 8, 2021
"I was running on fumes for decades."
Tutti TaygerlyMake Space to Lead
June 12, 2021
