Summary
We're all familiar with the standard justification for secondary research - it's a process to contextualise what's already known to plan more focused (primary) research studies. Among research practitioners and non-researchers, secondary research is rarely thought of as a method in itself - and rather a supplementary phase of work before the real investigation begins. In this talk, we hope to convince fellow researchers that secondary research can be more powerful and impactful than just offering a foundational starting point. With the right "research infrastructure‚" secondary research can allow us to step back, triangulate and evaluate not only a larger corpus of data but also consider data from different sources and teams to make better-informed decisions. We share how we evolved our secondary research processes to do more efficient research and help our teams make more informed decisions.
Key Insights
-
•
Secondary research can be a superpower by enabling ethical, efficient use of existing data to minimize participant fatigue.
-
•
Broadly defined, secondary research includes internal reports, third-party studies, and triangulation with unstructured live data like support tickets and analytics.
-
•
Many stakeholders believe secondary research is less rigorous or less applicable than primary, but presenting relevant data early can change this perception.
-
•
Structuring and curating secondary data into accessible repositories is critical yet often overlooked in organizations.
-
•
Secondary research is not merely a precursor to primary research but a strategic, standalone practice with value in discovery and synthesis phases.
-
•
Poor collaboration around data access and interpretation is a major barrier; proactive relationship building with other teams can alleviate this.
-
•
Sharing credit and demonstrating impact to data collaborators helps foster ongoing support and buy-in.
-
•
Secondary research can lower barriers to entry by democratizing access to large scale or costly datasets within an organization.
-
•
Refreshing secondary data depends on research type and problem space, with some 'evergreen' behavioral insights remaining valid longer.
-
•
Engaging stakeholders in the secondary research process—through sharing findings or workshops—can make it feel more active and valuable.
Notable Quotes
"I wasn’t making the most of the primary data I was collecting and not sitting with that data long enough to internalize what I was hearing."
"Secondary research is a way to respect your target population’s time rather than constantly dipping into them for new research."
"Stakeholders often believe secondary research is less rigorous or less applicable because it doesn’t perfectly align with their questions or populations."
"Starting a simple repository—even a table with titles, summaries, teams, and tags—can make all the difference in accessing existing research."
"Secondary research is not just a precursor; it can be a strategic piece of work that counts as real research."
"Building regular relationships early—even before you have a data request—helps build mutual understanding and collaboration."
"Delivering a clear request and explaining your project’s goals improves collaborator buy-in and clarity."
"Sharing credit with collaborators demonstrates you’re a good partner and highlights their impact on your work."
"The shelf life of secondary research depends on the type of research—some insights are evergreen while others need refreshing based on context changes."
"Bringing stakeholders along on the analysis process or workshops can make secondary research feel more engaging and active."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"We embed UX selectively in a few value streams and try to train others to balance research and design activities on their own."
Jack MoffettSAFe or Sorry? (Videoconference)
May 29, 2019
"Being comfortable with discomfort is a great way to stick with it, especially as someone who might be called out or told they’re wrong."
Tricia WangSCALE: Discussion
June 15, 2018
"Simplifying systems takes patience and happens slowly, often involving years of work and negotiation."
Fredrik MathesonFirst-time users, longtime strategies: Why Parkinson’s Law is making you less effective at work – and how to design a fix.
June 8, 2016
"Starting small is okay, and I actually recommend it for kickstarting this kind of work."
Laine Riley ProkayHow DesignOps can Drive Inclusive Career Ladders for All
September 30, 2021
"UserVoice let us merge similar requests internally, which was crucial before automation."
Shipra KayanHow we Built a VoC (Voice of the Customer) Practice at Upwork from the Ground Up
September 30, 2021
"Grinding momentum is a shared mental model that drives forward decision-making due to pressure and timelines."
Kristen Guth, Ph.D.Out of the FOG: A Non-traditional Research Approach to Alignment
March 28, 2023
"We need to create environments where everyone's voice has a place and value—not put the burden on marginalized individuals to navigate."
Joi FreemanA New Vantage Point: Building a Pipeline for Multifaceted Research(ers)
March 30, 2020
"Empathy is the secret ingredient to making products that truly resonate."
Victor UdoewaTheme One Intro
March 27, 2023
"If you do your job as a designer, talk to users, create great designs, it’s not enough. You need to get the strategy right."
Peter MerholzCustomer-Centered Design Organizations
June 8, 2017