Rosenverse
Have fun with statistics?

Log in or create a free Rosenverse account to watch this video.

Log in Create free account

100s of community videos are available to free members. Conference talks are generally available to Gold members.

Have fun with statistics?

Thursday, December 12, 2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Share the love for this talk
Have fun with statistics?
Speakers: Caroline Jarrett and Erin Weigel
Link:

Summary

Let’s face it, many of us feel daunted by statistics. But we also know that colleagues and clients ask whether our research has “statistically significant” results. Erin’s book Design for Impact helps you to test your hypotheses about improving design, and she guides you through deciding on your effect sizes to help you get those statistically significant results. Caroline’s book Surveys That Work talks about “significance in practice” and she’s not all that convinced about whether it’s worth aiming for statistical significance. Watch this lively session where Erin and Caroline compared and contrasted their ideas and approaches - helped by your questions and contributions.

Key Insights

  • Statistical significance often confuses practitioners because it requires mentally flipping hypotheses and disproving nulls, which is cognitively demanding.

  • Effect size is critical to understanding whether a change detected by statistics is meaningful in practice, a concept often neglected in statistics education.

  • Fast progress isn't necessarily good progress; teams benefit from slowing down and using statistics to ensure they're moving in the right direction.

  • Engineers can be reluctant to implement experiments due to the extra coding load, but they respond well when they understand the learning value gained.

  • Survey results (the numerical outcomes) are often confused with the number of respondents required for statistical significance, leading to misunderstandings.

  • Statistical thresholds like 95% confidence can be adjusted depending on project needs; lower confidence levels are sometimes acceptable.

  • A good hypothesis often starts as an intuitive guess, which gets refined over time through repeated testing and data collection.

  • Qualitative and quantitative research should be viewed as complementary tools in a holistic research approach rather than opposed methods.

  • AI tools can help generate first drafts of survey questions, but human-centered pilot testing is essential to avoid errors and misinterpretations.

  • It's common and acceptable to act on results that are significant in practice but not statistically significant, especially when outcomes clearly affect users.

Notable Quotes

"Statistics is hard because you have to flip flop in your head: think of a hypothesis, then a null hypothesis, then try to disprove the null."

"People confuse statistical significance with significance in practice — they want to know if the change is meaningful, not just mathematically significant."

"Fast is not a virtue in and of itself; moving slower and acting with intention ensures you go in the right direction."

"Engineers hate writing more code, so getting them to buy into experiments means showing the value of the learning on the other side."

"You can have an effect size that matters in practice but isn’t statistically significant, like five users failing a key task in usability testing."

"Most science starts with somebody pulling a number out of their ass — it’s okay to start with a gut instinct or guess."

"Statistics is another tool in our toolbox, part of a hierarchy of evidence that includes qualitative and quantitative methods."

"AI can create first drafts of survey questions, but unless you pilot test with real humans, you won’t know if your audience gets it."

"A lot of people think 95% confidence is the only way, but you can adjust confidence levels based on your situation and needs."

"Start with basics like means, minimums, and ranges — statistics rapidly becomes less mysterious and more useful with practice."

Ask the Rosenbot
Doug Powell
Closing Keynote: Design at Scale
2018 • DesignOps Summit 2018
Gold
Christian Bason
Innovating With People: Unleashing the Potential of Civic Design
2021 • Civic Design 2021
Gold
Crystal Philcox
The Many Faces of Operations
2017 • DesignOps Summit 2017
Gold
Denise Jacobs
Interactive Keynote: Social Change by Design
2024 • Enterprise Experience 2020
Gold
Gabrielle Verderber
Documentation Your Team Will Actually Use
2023 • DesignOps Summit 2023
Gold
Josh Clark
Sentient Scenes and Radically Adaptive Experiences
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Nalini P. Kotamraju
Two Jobs in One: Being a “Leader who is a Researcher” and a “Researcher who is a Leader"
2021 • Advancing Research 2021
Gold
Susan Weinschenk
Evaluating the Maturity of UX in Your Organization
2020 • Enterprise Community
Dan Willis
Enterprise Storytelling Sessions
2017 • Enterprise Experience 2017
Gold
Alba Villamil
Stereotyped by Design: Pitfalls in Cross-Cultural User Research
2020 • Advancing Research 2020
Gold
Husani Oakley
Bias Towards Action: Building Teams that Build Work
2018 • Enterprise Experience 2018
Gold
Jemma Ahmed
Democratization: Working with it, not against it [Advancing Research Community Workshop Series]
2024 • Advancing Research Community
Uday Gajendar
Leading through the long tail of trauma
2022 • Advancing Research Community
Aras Bilgen
Who does the math: A designer’s journey in building an AI-based tutoring app
2025 • Designing with AI 2025
Gold
Daniel Gloyd
Warming the User Experience: Lessons from America's first and most radical human-centered designers
2024 • Rosenfeld Community
Jemma Ahmed
Bringing together market and user research
2019 • Advancing Research Community

More Videos

Sofía Delsordo

"Good design needs better PR and the government has to be actively involved in the process."

Sofía Delsordo Kassim Vera

Public Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter

December 8, 2021

"Curiosity and asking lots of questions helps push boundaries and improve solutions."

Product and Design at Bloomberg: A 15-year Evolution

December 6, 2022

Liza Pemstein

"Research is a group project and learning is a group project—you don’t have to be an expert but find those who are."

Liza Pemstein Jane Davis

Scaling Research Via an Ops First Model at Clever

March 27, 2023

Kara Kane

"I’ve worked with international counterparts through 30 calls with designers around the world."

Kara Kane

Theme One Intro

November 16, 2022

Mark Interrante

"You have to check the AI’s work and provide feedback—just like you would with a human assistant."

Mark Interrante Harry Max

AI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)

July 11, 2024

Sam Proulx

"A good two-factor system offers multiple methods, like authenticator apps, calls, and texts, with generous timeouts."

Sam Proulx

Online Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience

October 3, 2023

Rich Mironov

"UX really doesn’t have a seat at the table yet and that has some implications for us."

Rich Mironov

How Can Product Managers and UXers Help Each Other (and Why are Product Folks so Annoying Sometimes)?

December 6, 2022

Juhan Sonin

"If someone says hell no, don’t stop, keep going."

Juhan Sonin

Design Now! The Agenda for Action

September 4, 2025

Mansi Gupta

"The trust gap stems from being repeatedly failed by a system, not innate risk aversion or imposter syndrome."

Mansi Gupta

Drawing from Feminist Practice to Make Inclusive Design Operational

September 9, 2022