Optimizing for Outcomes: Transformation Design in Systems at Scale
Summary
Moving beyond the service blueprint or user journey map, this case study explores some of the more non-traditional outputs and outcomes driven by service design, particularly through the lens of creating long-term transformational change. Stefanie will overview a variety of recipes for achieving transformative outcomes at three levels within government agencies: the product/service experience, program-wide or platform initiatives, and fundamental agency technology operations. The challenges for each layer are unique, but also offer different opportunities for where service designers can achieve sustainable, real impact. We’ll explore specific examples achieved by a breadth of designers, product managers, and engineers working within government before exploring how this model might be replicated across other partner government agencies to achieve our vision of making more government services become as simple, effective, and accessible as possible.
Key Insights
-
•
Transformation design applies human-centered design at every layer of government service delivery, including technical infrastructure.
-
•
Nava focuses on building better foundations, not just better facades, to create lasting organizational change.
-
•
Agile iteration culture is still not universal in government and introducing it through design can shift entrenched waterfall mindsets.
-
•
Designers embedded within technical teams, like at the VA, enable faster release cycles by identifying friction points and co-developing support processes.
-
•
Program-level service design can unify cross-agency teams with shared language, playbooks, and frameworks to synchronize complex federal initiatives.
-
•
Simplifying processes such as cloud infrastructure onboarding can reduce provisioning from months to 48 hours, saving costs and increasing adoption.
-
•
Using plain language playbooks helps caseworkers across states better understand and administer programs like Medicaid and SNAP.
-
•
Designers at the deepest organizational levels can advocate for policy and procurement changes to eliminate bottlenecks and burnout risks.
-
•
Despite challenges, design advocacy at technical and operational layers can build allies over time and spread human-centered design practices across agencies.
-
•
The scale of government systems means design improvements can have massive impact reaching millions of users and affecting significant portions of GDP.
Notable Quotes
"Build better foundations, not better facades."
"The highest impact levers for long-term transformation exist in technical infrastructure and operations."
"Many federal benefit programs face challenges verifying income, causing stress and leaving billions in unclaimed benefits."
"Injecting a culture of agile iteration sets the precedent that things can and will change as the team learns."
"Designers can help cross-functional teams learn and grow together through building shared understanding and common language."
"Making onboarding easier at the infrastructure layer results in huge efficiency gains and cost savings."
"Designers embedded alongside technical teams can spot unseen issues in the spaces between operational silos."
"An agency developing shared technical infrastructure must market to itself why change is preferred, not just rely on top-down mandate."
"It can be hard for designers to immediately understand or advocate for the real value of design at deeper technical layers."
"What one government agency does often serves as the playbook for success at another."
Or choose a question:
More Videos
"Good design needs better PR and the government has to be actively involved in the process."
Sofía Delsordo Kassim VeraPublic Policy for Jalisco's Designers to Make Design Matter
December 8, 2021
"Design needs to balance business strategy and technology limitations but always keep users centered."
Product and Design at Bloomberg: A 15-year Evolution
December 6, 2022
"I want to encourage excitement about research and gradually mold people into better researchers."
Liza Pemstein Jane DavisScaling Research Via an Ops First Model at Clever
March 27, 2023
"Design ideas come back around again and again, waiting for leadership or new contexts to take root."
Kara KaneTheme One Intro
November 16, 2022
"Using a playbook helps codify domain knowledge and prioritization criteria for AI to apply."
Mark Interrante Harry MaxAI for Prioritization (3rd of 3 seminars)
July 11, 2024
"The four Cs—consistency, convenience, confidence, and customizability—are not just good for accessibility, they make a great experience for everyone."
Sam ProulxOnline Shopping: Designing an Accessible Experience
October 3, 2023
"Product managers are going to have to say no to roughly 95% of everything that comes in."
Rich MironovHow Can Product Managers and UXers Help Each Other (and Why are Product Folks so Annoying Sometimes)?
December 6, 2022
"The more ideas you make, the quality of your ideas also goes up."
Juhan SoninDesign Now! The Agenda for Action
September 4, 2025
"I’m dreaming of a world where women-centricity is so ingrained that frameworks like this don’t need to exist anymore."
Mansi GuptaDrawing from Feminist Practice to Make Inclusive Design Operational
September 9, 2022
Latest Books All books
Dig deeper with the Rosenbot
Why is assessing design students challenging, and what are the limitations of traditional grading systems?
How are job market shifts influencing the skills and focus areas of UX researchers?
What design strategies can support community-led rebuilding of maternal healthcare in rural maternity care deserts?